Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Poor\s+Operating\?\s+nawwwwww\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Poor\s+Operating\?\s+nawwwwww\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Poor Operating? nawwwwww (score: 1): Author: jonathan.schulz at siemens.com (Schulz Jonathan); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:33:25 -0500; ya EVERY time there is a CW contest those RTTY guys just love to go picking fights with the CW guys... as discussed previously 7.040-7.050 is a PRIME DX RTTY frequencies due to their frequency alloca; /archives//html/SECC/2005-01/msg00087.html (8,632 bytes)
2. [SECC] Poor Operating? nawwwwww (score: 1): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:40:47 -0500; Not quite. EU RTTY frequencies are generally from 7.030 to 7.040. Although I will admit there is a lot of US to US RTTY in this same segment. When CW and RTTY conflict, it's just better to stay out o; /archives//html/SECC/2005-01/msg00088.html (7,847 bytes)
3. [SECC] Poor Operating? nawwwwww (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:35:28 -0500; 40 meters is really messed up and the FCC needs to act on it now.... Jon, the problem is that many of the RTTY guys in the contest would intentionally QRM those doing the NAQP on CW... I think that i; /archives//html/SECC/2005-01/msg00089.html (10,735 bytes)
4. [SECC] Poor Operating? nawwwwww (score: 1): Author: jonathan.schulz at siemens.com (Schulz Jonathan); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:34:02 -0500; I was wrong in my quoting 7.04-7.05 as the freq allocated to DX as K9MUG pointed out it is 7.035-7.045. I am one of the "soundcard" RTTY contest guys the have blossomed in the last 2 years - previous; /archives//html/SECC/2005-01/msg00091.html (10,149 bytes)
5. [SECC] Poor Operating? nawwwwww (score: 1): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:51:13 -0500; ku8e@bellsouth.net wrote: 40 meters is really messed up and the FCC needs to act on it now.... Jon, the problem is that many of the RTTY guys in the contest would intentionally QRM those doing the NA; /archives//html/SECC/2005-01/msg00092.html (8,563 bytes)
6. [SECC] Poor Operating? nawwwwww (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel L. Jeswald); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:22:51 -0500; Another approach is to fire up on TTY and call CQ contest on top of them for a while. Dan/W4NTI; /archives//html/SECC/2005-01/msg00093.html (9,226 bytes)
7. [SECC] Poor Operating? nawwwwww (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel L. Jeswald); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:23:06 -0500; I'll tell yaa what then. Next time I'm on 40 cw and a ''goodguy RTTY fella'' clobbers me in the middle of a QSO I'll fire up the RTTY program and find out who it is. Then post it here. Should be a bu; /archives//html/SECC/2005-01/msg00095.html (11,921 bytes)
8. [SECC] Poor Operating? nawwwwww (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel L. Jeswald); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:23:09 -0500; No it's not asking too much...if we had 150 kc of CW. Which, in reality, we don't and have not had for decades. CW has been crunched into the bottom 40 kc/s for a decade now. And with the advent of m; /archives//html/SECC/2005-01/msg00096.html (10,443 bytes)
9. [SECC] Poor Operating? nawwwwww (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel L. Jeswald); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:23:55 -0500; Thats right....spillover all the way to the Extra subband. Now thats what I call spillover. Dan/W4NTI; /archives//html/SECC/2005-01/msg00097.html (10,560 bytes)
10. [SECC] Poor Operating? nawwwwww (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:27:23 -0500; Jon, I don't know if it's intentional or not but every time there is a RTTY and CW contest going on at the same time I have someone on RTTY fire up on my frequency, even though it was clear when I st; /archives//html/SECC/2005-01/msg00098.html (12,239 bytes)
11. [SECC] Poor Operating? nawwwwww (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:27:34 -0500; Jon, I don't know if it's intentional or not but every time there is a RTTY and CW contest going on at the same time I have someone on RTTY fire up on my frequency, even though it was clear when I st; /archives//html/SECC/2005-01/msg00099.html (12,138 bytes)
12. [SECC] Poor Operating? nawwwwww (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:27:42 -0500; Jon, I don't know if it's intentional or not but every time there is a RTTY and CW contest going on at the same time I have someone on RTTY fire up on my frequency, even though it was clear when I st; /archives//html/SECC/2005-01/msg00100.html (12,011 bytes)
13. [SECC] Poor Operating? nawwwwww (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:35:33 -0500; Plus someone like K4BAI had only 15kc to play with on 40 because he couldn't work the guys who normally would not be in the extra band due to the RTTY QRM due to his license restrictions. You couldn'; /archives//html/SECC/2005-01/msg00101.html (11,586 bytes)
14. [SECC] Poor Operating? nawwwwww (score: 1): Author: thompson at mindspring.com (David Thompson); Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:32:17 -0500; 40 meters is a mess if more than one mode is holding a contest on that band. The worst offenders are the RTTY ops who can cover virtually all of the lower 100 khz. Hopefully more will move to the 710; /archives//html/SECC/2005-01/msg00116.html (8,760 bytes)
15. [SECC] Poor Operating? nawwwwww (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:49:29 -0500; The main problem on 40m is that Regions 1 and 3 only have 100 kHz of band. Since most countries typically allocate half the band to SSB, The RTTY and CW guys have to share the bottom half. That doesn; /archives//html/SECC/2005-01/msg00176.html (9,017 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]