Mail Archive Search: <+from:bill>

Results:

References: [ +from:bill: 174 ]

Total 174 documents matching your query.

61. [TRLog] Very Pleased (score: 1): Author: n9br@rsg.org (Bill R); Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 13:17:14 -0600; Hi Bud, Not being able to update past the last five q's has been the one annoying problem with TR forever....Tree won't fix it.... I am sure he (and one or two others hi hi) don't make very many mist; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00031.html (8,116 bytes)
62. [TRLog] Very Pleased (score: 1): Author: n9br@mc.net (Bill R); Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 15:07:11 -0600; Hi Rod, Say what you want...I'm a life subscriber...TR user by choice and still DO think it is a shortcoming in the program. In my view it would be a better program if it could incorporate the seamle; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00036.html (10,219 bytes)
63. [TRLog] Very Pleased (score: 1): Author: n9br@rsg.org (Bill); Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 18:43:51 -0800; Hi Dale, Give me a break...don't you think accuracy would give you a better score? Control N ...what? Doesn't it seem a little strange that you can have a logging program that you CAN'T edit a logged; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00038.html (12,535 bytes)
64. [TRLog] Very Pleased (score: 1): Author: n9br@rsg.org (Bill R); Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 09:39:34 -0600; Bob, You're missing the point, a logging program should allow you to edit in real time to maintain an up to date and accurate log. A contest program should allow you to work quickly. Shutting down, r; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00047.html (16,340 bytes)
65. [TRLog] Very Pleased (score: 1): Author: n9br@rsg.org (Bill R); Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 09:56:02 -0600; Mark, Sorry you think it's a " cheap shot" and better not made in public....why? I'm discussing TR ...didn't personally attack anyone. I merely said I think TR would be better if it had editing......; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00048.html (16,904 bytes)
66. [TRLog] Very Pleased (score: 1): Author: n9br@rsg.org (Bill R); Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 11:48:58 -0600; Mark, Wow you are way... WAY out in left field. I didn't "ridicule" anyone...Not you, (don't think you had anything to do with the thread...) or anyone else on the reflector... Tree knows how I feel; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00050.html (9,233 bytes)
67. [TRLog] Very Pleased (score: 1): Author: n9br@rsg.org (Bill R); Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 11:56:20 -0600; Hi Gil, Thanks for the idea..I'll try it and see if I can get it to work. Sounds like it could.....and if you don't have to shut down TR it would be a lot faster. What editor are you using? 73 Bill N; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00051.html (20,498 bytes)
68. [TRLog] A good compromise? (score: 1): Author: n9br@rsg.org (Bill R); Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 14:42:36 -0600; Hi Tom, Sounds like a winner to me too if it could be done.... Tree any hope? 73 Bill N9BR and -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00058.html (10,202 bytes)
69. [TRLog] Very Pleased (score: 1): Author: n9br@mc.net (Bill R); Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 15:33:10 -0600; Sorry Mark, I did think your e-mail arrived via the reflector. In any case I have recieved letters of support and they have been sent directly to me. I wouldn't have posted your e-mail if I saw it wa; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00061.html (9,332 bytes)
70. [TRLog] REAL-TIME EDITING of LOG (score: 1): Author: n9br@rsg.org (Bill); Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 04:10:17 -0800; Believe it.... Keep practicing and after LOTS of hard work you'll get better too !! Editing won't seem so hard. It'll help your score just like the two radio mult/run stuff does. Well maybe it would; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00143.html (8,569 bytes)
71. [TRLog] new contestor's question (score: 1): Author: wbcapps@mindspring.com (Bill Capps); Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 15:16:18 -0700; hello all i have recently downloaded the free trial version of trlog and have enjoyed trying it out on my pc. I am new to contesting and what little contesting i have done in the past has been with c; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-07/msg00095.html (7,123 bytes)
72. [TRLog] Wallstreet Journal (score: 1): Author: ak0a@sound.net (Bill Boeckenhaupt); Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 09:34:21 -0500; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_003B_01BEACDB.17F80CA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable A good article on the f; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-06/msg00010.html (7,236 bytes)
73. [TRLog] font control for 43 lines... (score: 1): Author: baycock@hiwaay.net (Bill Aycock); Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 15:30:16 -0500; There is a DOS command that has several meanings and applications. The "MODE" commond, with "CON" is used to set the display when under DOS. the command is : MODE CON[ : ] [COL=n] [LINES=n] Valid col; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-05/msg00089.html (7,839 bytes)
74. [TRLog] font control for 43 lines...(ERROR) (score: 1): Author: baycock@hiwaay.net (Bill Aycock); Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 15:35:06 -0500; THIS LINE IS AN ERROR it should be MODE CON Sorry- Bill - Bill Aycock -- Persimmon Hill Woodville, Alabama, US 35776 (in the N.E. corner of the State) W4BSG -- Grid EM64vr baycock@HiWAAY.net -- FAQ o; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-05/msg00090.html (7,981 bytes)
75. [TRLog] Split operation problem (score: 1): Author: wtill@bordercity.com (Bill Till - VE5FN); Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 21:21:02 -0600; We have been using TRLog at our MM station, VE5RI, for over 3 years and are very pleased with it, except for a very few little glitches. One of these shows up when we are running split tx/rx on 40 me; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-04/msg00137.html (6,729 bytes)
76. [TRLog] Ver. 6.34 Feature ? (score: 1): Author: wrt@eskimo.com (Bill Turner, W7TI); Date: Thu, 03 Dec 1998 01:19:06 GMT; ______________________________________________ This sounds very much like RF getting into the keyboard. Did you try reducing power or switching to a dummy load? If the problem goes away, the usual fi; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-12/msg00018.html (8,201 bytes)
77. [TRLog] LOG FILE NAME command not wkg (score: 1): Author: wrt@eskimo.com (Bill Turner, W7TI); Date: Thu, 03 Dec 1998 04:54:08 GMT; Can't get the LOG FILE NAME command to work. No matter what I put in for a file name, the program halts when loading and gives an error message. I've tried using the standard XXXXX.DAT name format, t; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-12/msg00021.html (6,750 bytes)
78. [TRLog] ARRL format vs. log.dat (score: 1): Author: wrt@eskimo.com (Bill Turner, W7TI); Date: Sat, 05 Dec 1998 17:02:19 GMT; On Fri, 04 Dec 1998 23:56:43, Scott Lieberman <scott73@best.com> wrote: ______________________________________________ W6CT uses TR? Hmmm.... But in all seriousness, it wouldn't hurt to email your di; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-12/msg00038.html (7,293 bytes)
79. [TRLog] Question about Trlog (score: 1): Author: wrt@eskimo.com (Bill Turner, W7TI); Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 12:28:04 GMT; On Thu, 10 Dec 1998 05:27:58 GMT, "Rick Bullon" <kc5ajx@hotmail.com> wrote: <snip> ______________________________________________________________ Rick, may I offer a suggestion? Whether you get your; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-12/msg00055.html (7,603 bytes)
80. [TRLog] database (score: 1): Author: bill@max.rl.plh.af.mil (Bill); Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1998 10:51:23 -0500; Who has the best, most accurate name/call database for TR. I have one that is about 4 years old..now no one knows my call and I don't know them either....soooo, would like to update without spending; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-11/msg00154.html (6,556 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]