Mail Archive Search: <+from:gbaron@home.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:gbaron@home.com: 60 ]

Total 60 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] TRLog in the RTTY Sprint (long) (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gil Baron); Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 22:11:47 -0500; --==_106741646==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed I see no reason to use TRLOG on an RTTY contest. The capabilities of WriteLog to integrate MMTTY AND the DXTELNET spo; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-10/msg00039.html (43,836 bytes)
2. [TRLog] TRLog in the RTTY Sprint (long) (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gil Baron); Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 06:08:59 -0500; --==_135373727==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed I realize that is true BUT it is in DOS and if you have a PCI sound card it is going to be VERY hard. With WriteLog y; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-10/msg00042.html (12,646 bytes)
3. [TRLog] TRLog in the RTTY Sprint (long) (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gil Baron); Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 09:00:28 -0500; --==_145662501==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed What are you referring to here. I tend to think it is better for CW too, but marginally. Yes, the lack of a windows v; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-10/msg00045.html (16,256 bytes)
4. [TRLog] TRLog in the RTTY Sprint (long) (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gil Baron); Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 09:59:29 -0500; --==_149203082==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed With WIN XP and WIN2000 it would be just as stable as the DOS version and the lack of features you write about could; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-10/msg00048.html (20,396 bytes)
5. [TRLog] TRLog in the RTTY Sprint (long) (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gil Baron); Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 12:02:53 -0500; --==_156606428==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Dos machines will not be extinct i=until all that you can buy are 64 bit machines. That 9is not as far off as you may; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-10/msg00051.html (16,540 bytes)
6. [TRLog] TRLog in the RTTY Sprint (long) (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gil Baron); Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 12:09:13 -0500; --==_156986554==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Tree; I have to agree with everything that you say. I do no have any bone to pick with you. It is just that it is not; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-10/msg00052.html (21,138 bytes)
7. [TRLog] TRLog in the RTTY Sprint (long) (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gil Baron); Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 12:12:57 -0500; --==_157210687==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Everything you say hear is true and it is too bad. I would have aid up to 100 dollars for a fully functional windows; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-10/msg00053.html (17,982 bytes)
8. [TRLog] TRLog in the RTTY Sprint (long) (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gil Baron); Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 15:23:08 -0500; --==_168622005==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed I don't see why it could not be done in C++. This CW is a VERY slow thing compared to the speed of tady's machines. T; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-10/msg00057.html (15,142 bytes)
9. [TRLog] TRLog in the RTTY Sprint (long) (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gil Baron); Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 16:46:39 -0500; --==_173632440==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Such keyers already exist. The cost is prohibitive for most and not needed in any case for most. Gil Baron http://mem; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-10/msg00059.html (14,139 bytes)
10. [TRLog] TRLog in the RTTY Sprint (long) (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gil Baron); Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 22:55:19 -0500; --==_12279126==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed That is not true. It is impossible to have a stable windows AND a dos box . You simply cannot allow the application to; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-10/msg00063.html (24,854 bytes)
11. [TRLog] TRLog in the RTTY Sprint (long) (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gil Baron); Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 05:56:59 -0500; --==_37578424==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Gil Baron http://members.home.com/gbaron W0MN 44.08208 N 92.51263 W 1055' "Baila como nadie te ve" --==_37578424==_.AL; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-10/msg00069.html (16,468 bytes)
12. [TRLog] TRLog in the RTTY Sprint (long) (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gil Baron); Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 06:03:25 -0500; --==_37963819==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed And you cannot do that with stability because old dos programs need direct access to the hardware and win2000 will not; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-10/msg00070.html (12,402 bytes)
13. [TRLog] Updates (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gil Baron); Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:54:56 -0500; --==_900434==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed I surely wish I did not get FOUR copies of hte RELEASE NOTERS and notification of new version. I only get ONE of the act; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-08/msg00078.html (15,770 bytes)
14. [TRLog] TR and Rigblaster (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gil Baron); Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:18:58 -0500; --==_88398780==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed I am using sbdvp with success. The secret is in the batch fiels used to load and especailly to save any changes. This; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-08/msg00106.html (12,328 bytes)
15. [TRLog] TR//logwindows (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gil Baron); Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 05:52:43 -0600; I could not agree more. I find it a pain it switch from DOS to Windows and back all of the time. Today, there is no need for that. The program MUST run in Windows 2000 before I consider it though. Do; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-06/msg00032.html (10,224 bytes)
16. [TRLog] Booting to MS-DOS with Windows ME (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gilbert Baron); Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 16:01:18 -0600; NO NO NO , Windows ME is NOT in ANY manner shape or form a version of NT. This confusion comes from WINDOWS 2000 (NOT ME) which IS based on the NT Kernel. A TOTALLY different thing. Windows ME is ST; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-01/msg00021.html (9,839 bytes)
17. [TRLog] Booting to MS-DOS with Windows ME (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gilbert Baron); Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 06:40:32 -0600; That is not possible if you want to allow stealing (REALLY DMA) to work. It is NOT the DMA that is causing the problem but rather the fact that windows uses time sharing to execute programs. It give; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-01/msg00030.html (10,762 bytes)
18. [TRLog] Booting to MS-DOS with Windows ME (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gilbert Baron); Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 08:54:24 -0600; YES this is possible and is exactly what I posted earlier. Already Hamscope does this for CW and it works perfectly on Windows 2000. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog Submissions: tr; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-01/msg00033.html (14,022 bytes)
19. [TRLog] ARRL 10Mtr Contest Prefixes (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gilbert Baron); Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 12:49:40 -0600; I am trying to set up for ARRL 10M and it does not recognize NU as a VE province and will not let me log such a contact. is there a new domestic file for this? _ Gil Baron http://members.home.com/gba; /archives//html/TRLog/2000-12/msg00063.html (6,681 bytes)
20. [TRLog] SBDVP (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gilbert Baron); Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 14:11:23 -0600; I have been trying to set p SBDVP for 10Mtr contest. I have it working well except for one problem. It does not work the push to talk line. Does anyone know which line the program toggles for PTT. Is; /archives//html/TRLog/2000-12/msg00065.html (6,893 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]