- 1. Re: [Trlog] TRlog - Icom IC-756proII ? (score: 1)
- Author: <mark@nevus.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:21:38 -0500
- Paul, My Icom 746PROs (I have 2 side-by-side SO2R) are similar in a lot of ways to the 756PROII. I had to do a lot of configuration to get mine working right. I had to go into the radios' menus and
- /archives//html/TRLog/2004-08/msg00008.html (8,516 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Trlog] TRlog - Icom IC-756proII ? (score: 1)
- Author: <mark@nevus.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 18:57:15 -0500
- Good to hear from you, OM. I am wanting to keep that trick up my sleeve for now, because I may want to network the laptop at the same time, too. Mark, N5OT __________________________________________
- /archives//html/TRLog/2004-08/msg00009.html (7,045 bytes)
- 3. [Trlog] 4-port card for an old machine? (score: 1)
- Author: <mark@nevus.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:48:39 -0600
- I am wanting to get some 4-port cards for my dedicated TRlog machines. The archive discussions all seem to be quite old, so I wonder what the hot tip is these days? Mark N5OT ________________________
- /archives//html/TRLog/2004-11/msg00068.html (7,721 bytes)
- 4. [Trlog] take SO2R to the next level (score: 1)
- Author: <mark@nevus.org>
- Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 09:44:49 -0600
- Mark said: Given that WP3R keeps winning this thing, maybe we should think about this! :-) (I'm not so sure this follows). Then Tree said: Last I heard, Rich is using CT. Well, "you can pry my TR out
- /archives//html/TRLog/2004-11/msg00119.html (10,282 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Trlog] FW: Re: [PVRC] TR-Log on fast computer. (score: 1)
- Author: <mark@nevus.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:58:20 -0600
- Anybody seen a problem running TR-Log on a fast computer? I can't think of what would be an issue with TR on a fast computer. Everything has run the same for me from 12 MHZ computers in the old days
- /archives//html/TRLog/2004-11/msg00124.html (8,153 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu