- 1. [Trlog] CW Reverse for Omni VII (score: 1)
- Author: "Wayne, W0ZW" <w0zw@fastmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 May 2024 15:39:00 -0600
- Using TRLog for Linux 0.59. The CW Mode command selects UCW on my Omni VII (I am using rigctld Rig # 16011) . Is there a magic logcfg.dat command that selects LCW instead? When I tried using "FT1000M
- /archives//html/TRLog/2024-05/msg00000.html (6,087 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Trlog] CW Reverse for Omni VII (score: 1)
- Author: "Wayne, W0ZW" <w0zw@fastmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 May 2024 18:30:57 -0600
- Thanks Tree! Changing the CW Reverse value to TRUE in the Ctrl-J menu worked. Should have looked there first. Very nice feature for the lazy operator (me). No need for any change requests. Thanks aga
- /archives//html/TRLog/2024-05/msg00001.html (8,200 bytes)
- 3. [Trlog] TRLog Linux Operation with HAL DXP38 Modem (score: 1)
- Author: "Wayne, W0ZW" <w0zw@fastmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2024 11:38:59 -0600
- Recently I became interested in exploring the use of TRLog Linux for RTTY contesting. I find TRLog Linux quite enjoyable to use in CW contesting and wondered if that might also extend to RTTY contest
- /archives//html/TRLog/2024-05/msg00002.html (15,435 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Trlog] Trlog Digest, Vol 246, Issue 2 (score: 1)
- Author: "Wayne, W0ZW" <w0zw@fastmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2024 14:30:15 -0600
- Tree - Thanks so much for the clarifications. Besides a new LOGCFG command for the RTTY PORT speed (thanks!), I don't know what other program changes to request yet (if any). At this point I am not a
- /archives//html/TRLog/2024-05/msg00004.html (11,417 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Trlog] TRLog Linux Operation with HAL DXP38 Modem (score: 1)
- Author: "Wayne, W0ZW" <w0zw@fastmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 15:59:18 -0600
- Here the next step in my debug process for configuring TRLog Linux to work with my HAL DXP38 modem. I needed a way to monitor what commands are being sent to the DXP38 from the trlog application. To
- /archives//html/TRLog/2024-05/msg00005.html (12,425 bytes)
- 6. [Trlog] LOG.DAT vs. LONGLOG.DAT (score: 1)
- Author: "Wayne, W0ZW" <w0zw@fastmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 20:31:49 -0600
- This past weekend I used TR Log (Linux) to log my entry in the CQWW WPX CW contest. Overall I found TR Log quite fun to use and discovered I could concentrate on operating the contest instead of on t
- /archives//html/TRLog/2024-05/msg00009.html (7,089 bytes)
- 7. Re: [Trlog] LOG.DAT vs. LONGLOG.DAT (score: 1)
- Author: "Wayne, W0ZW" <w0zw@fastmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 07:26:29 -0600
- Thanks for the info Tree. OK then LOG.DAT would have any edited changes made using Alt-E during the contest, is that correct? If this is true then only LONGLOG.DAT should be edited and corrected to m
- /archives//html/TRLog/2024-05/msg00011.html (9,850 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu