Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+ARRL\s+format\s+vs\.\s+log\.dat\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+ARRL\s+format\s+vs\.\s+log\.dat\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] ARRL format vs. log.dat (score: 1): Author: scott73@best.com (Scott Lieberman); Date: Fri, 04 Dec 1998 23:56:43; Is there any chance the ARRL will start accepting log.dat files? Scott Lieberman San Jose, California Ham Radio: W6CT -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contest; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-12/msg00037.html (6,869 bytes)
2. [TRLog] ARRL format vs. log.dat (score: 1): Author: wrt@eskimo.com (Bill Turner, W7TI); Date: Sat, 05 Dec 1998 17:02:19 GMT; On Fri, 04 Dec 1998 23:56:43, Scott Lieberman <scott73@best.com> wrote: ______________________________________________ W6CT uses TR? Hmmm.... But in all seriousness, it wouldn't hurt to email your di; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-12/msg00038.html (7,293 bytes)
3. [TRLog] ARRL format vs. log.dat (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com); Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 09:26:20 -0800 (PST); Well, I am not sure this would do much good. There is already a big effort in place to update the log checking software that the ARRL uses. This is a long process and the end result might be more fl; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-12/msg00039.html (7,456 bytes)
4. [TRLog] ARRL format vs. log.dat (score: 1): Author: scott73@best.com (Scott Lieberman); Date: Sat, 05 Dec 1998 09:18:39; The competition, ie: CQ magazine, does. The NCJ does also. So, it doesn't seem too far of a leap to hope that the League will follow suit. Not at all. But it is a pain to have to convert all ARRL lo; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-12/msg00040.html (7,383 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]