Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+Do\s+we\s+need\s+Advanced\s+testers\s+for\s+TR\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+Do\s+we\s+need\s+Advanced\s+testers\s+for\s+TR\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] Do we need Advanced testers for TR? (score: 1): Author: je1cka@nal.go.jp (Tack Kumagai); Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 18:02:16 +0900; In other community like Linux Open Source, there are several testers who tests the most newly released versions then major bugs will be fixed in that tester group. It must be impossible to remove all; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00303.html (7,536 bytes)
2. [TRLog] Do we need Advanced testers for TR? (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 11:05:50 -0500; After over 3 decades in the software business, I can tell you that advanced testers are a sword that cuts both ways. The advance group, and the lead time necessary to get it to the advance group with; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00305.html (8,865 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]