- 1. [TRLog] S&P to CQ switching and other Suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: w4zw@home.com (Jon, W4ZW)
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 21:06:34 -0500
- On a little different subject, I had the strange experience of TR logging four Q's on 160M randomly in my log, but I never operated on 160. The interface to my FT-1000MP seems to work fine ( although
- /archives//html/TRLog/1999-01/msg00036.html (10,552 bytes)
- 2. FW: [TRLog] S&P to CQ switching and other Suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: w4zw@home.com (Jon, W4ZW)
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 09:51:50 -0500
- Jon Hamlet, W4ZW Casey Key Island, Florida "A little bit of paradise in the Gulf of Mexico" Hi, W4ZW: edit I generally agree, but then we'd probably have to have CONFIRM ESCAPE WITHOUT SAVING in addi
- /archives//html/TRLog/1999-01/msg00042.html (9,667 bytes)
- 3. FW: [TRLog] S&P to CQ switching and other Suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 10:10:05 -0700
- Are you using disk caching? It makes a huge difference, especially on an old clunker 486 like mine. Try adding the following to your autoexec.bat LH C:\DOS\SMARTDRV A+ C+ Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma,
- /archives//html/TRLog/1999-01/msg00049.html (7,775 bytes)
- 4. FW: [TRLog] S&P to CQ switching and other Suggestions (score: 1)
- Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com)
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 10:13:29 -0800 (PST)
- Yup - this would explain it. While the disk is being updated without a cache, keystrokes aren't being processed (DOS does this). Tree -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissio
- /archives//html/TRLog/1999-01/msg00050.html (7,436 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu