Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+WAE\s+CW\,\s+Win98\s+compatibility\?\,\s+Labels\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+WAE\s+CW\,\s+Win98\s+compatibility\?\,\s+Labels\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] WAE CW, Win98 compatibility?, Labels (score: 1): Author: k9gy@contesting.com (Eric K9GY); Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1998 02:44:24 -0700; Two questions for the list: 1) Testing out TR for the WAE CW this weekend...Seems like the QTC feature only sends QSO's that have scrolled off the screen (i.e. LOG.DAT) and does not consider the QSO'; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-08/msg00011.html (7,838 bytes)
2. [TRLog] WAE CW, Win98 compatibility?, Labels (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (Tree N6TR); Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 21:34:50 -0700 (PDT); That is the way it is. Hmmm.... Tree -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-tr; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-08/msg00012.html (7,367 bytes)
3. [TRLog] WAE CW, Win98 compatibility?, Labels (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1998 11:17:31 +0000; I beleive that's the way the beast works. I am running TRLog in a DOS window under WIN98. While on whole WIN98 seems to be much better behaved overall than WIN95, every setup is different. For the ju; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-08/msg00013.html (8,098 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]