- 1. [TRLog] WPX rule change (score: 1)
- Author: n4gn@n4gn.com (Tim Totten, N4GN)
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:01:33 -0500 (EST)
- The rule change craze has struck again. I guess someone poll tested the question, and a majority of over-the-hill middle class white guys favored changing the WPX M/S category rules. I wish the polls
- /archives//html/TRLog/2001-03/msg00096.html (8,123 bytes)
- 2. [TRLog] WPX rule change (score: 1)
- Author: k1ky@bellsouth.net (Tom Delker)
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:25:04 -0600
- Yes Tim, this is a problem. We have to contend with this during our Sweepstakes Multi/Ops. It is very difficult for the operators to get the contacts logged quickly sometimes when CQ-ing, but the "mu
- /archives//html/TRLog/2001-03/msg00100.html (7,724 bytes)
- 3. [TRLog] WPX rule change (score: 1)
- Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR)
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:16:51 -0800
- I agree. It seems really wrong to create rules that can't be followed if you are using paper logs. Tree -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administr
- /archives//html/TRLog/2001-03/msg00102.html (6,869 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu