Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Trlog\]\s+4\-port\s+card\s+for\s+an\s+old\s+machine\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Trlog\]\s+4\-port\s+card\s+for\s+an\s+old\s+machine\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Trlog] 4-port card for an old machine? (score: 1): Author: <mark@nevus.org>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:48:39 -0600; I am wanting to get some 4-port cards for my dedicated TRlog machines. The archive discussions all seem to be quite old, so I wonder what the hot tip is these days? Mark N5OT ________________________; /archives//html/TRLog/2004-11/msg00068.html (7,721 bytes)
2. Re: [Trlog] 4-port card for an old machine? (score: 1): Author: "David Hachadorian" <K6LL@adelphia.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 18:49:56 -0700; dedicated TRlog machines. The wonder what the hot tip -- Byterunner and SIIG both make good ISA boards with four serial ports. With the Byterunner, the four ports can share the same IRQ. I'm using on; /archives//html/TRLog/2004-11/msg00072.html (8,525 bytes)
3. Re: [Trlog] 4-port card for an old machine? (score: 1): Author: kd4d@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 01:53:59 +0000; Hi David: The new TR version is going to be IRQ-aware. I believe Tree indicated that he would support shared IRQ's. CT, for instance, doesn't. Tree, do I remember that correctly? I hope so! :-) 73, M; /archives//html/TRLog/2004-11/msg00073.html (7,974 bytes)
4. Re: [Trlog] 4-port card for an old machine? (score: 1): Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 22:40:48 -0800; I'm about to purchase the Byterunner PCI-800H-CB which gives you 8 ports and a nice break-out box for your connections. At $192, it appears to be a good deal. http://www.byterunner.com for Byterunner; /archives//html/TRLog/2004-11/msg00080.html (8,984 bytes)
5. Re: [Trlog] 4-port card for an old machine? (score: 1): Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 22:49:33 -0800; I'm planning on buying an 8 port Byterunner card (PCI) which I expect to function when running TR. I run TR in Win98 SE. Mark's comment makes me wonder if I'm about to make a mistake and buy somethin; /archives//html/TRLog/2004-11/msg00081.html (9,451 bytes)
6. Re: [Trlog] 4-port card for an old machine? (score: 1): Author: "David Hachadorian" <K6LL@adelphia.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 06:50:56 -0700; (PCI) which I expect to Mark's comment makes something I can't use. -- I'm no computer wonk, but isn't it extremely difficult to run a PCI device in a DOS Window under Win98? I remember one guy descr; /archives//html/TRLog/2004-11/msg00084.html (7,857 bytes)
7. Re: [Trlog] 4-port card for an old machine? (score: 1): Author: kd4d@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 15:00:20 +0000; Hi Dave: The ByteRunner cards make it pretty easy to run them under DOS. I have no experience with them under a DOS window under Windows98SE. I would be very interested in hearing from anyone who has; /archives//html/TRLog/2004-11/msg00085.html (9,279 bytes)
8. Re: [Trlog] 4-port card for an old machine? (score: 1): Author: Ken Beals <k6mr@pacbell.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 08:03:03 -0800; I was using a 2 port PCI serial card for a while, under Win98. The limitation I ran into was that Windoze would assign an oddball port address (something like 1058 and 1060). Unfortunately it doesn't; /archives//html/TRLog/2004-11/msg00086.html (10,601 bytes)
9. Re: [Trlog] 4-port card for an old machine? (score: 1): Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>; Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 01:38:27 -0800; Wow, I'm glad I asked - I think. I run TR in a Win98SE window because I like to have access to stuff like DX Atlas on the 2nd monitor (or to my e-mail when WAE RTTY cndx are like they have been all w; /archives//html/TRLog/2004-11/msg00093.html (8,400 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]