Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Trlog\]\s+FW\:\s+TR683\s+with\s+TenTec\s+Orion\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Trlog\]\s+FW\:\s+TR683\s+with\s+TenTec\s+Orion\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Trlog] FW: TR683 with TenTec Orion? (score: 1): Author: "Fred Helmstetter" <fjh@uwm.edu>; Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:38:50 -0500; Aside from the Alt-B/V thing radio control using 6.83 with a 1000MP and IC746 here seems just fine. This Alt-B glitch does make it easy to get out of sync and potentially log somebody on the wrong ba; /archives//html/TRLog/2006-10/msg00040.html (10,481 bytes)
2. Re: [Trlog] FW: TR683 with TenTec Orion? (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 04:47:15 +0000; N9FH noted: The packet port seems to be wanting something different than before. I see consistent gibberish, but without LF problems. 6.8* here not talking to IC-765 at all. If somebody has managed t; /archives//html/TRLog/2006-10/msg00042.html (7,132 bytes)
3. Re: [Trlog] FW: TR683 with TenTec Orion? (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:01:29 +0000; I had previously posted: Feedback has confirmed 6.8* now wants to talk faster than default (read: reliable) speed for 751/765-era ICOMs & seems to no longer pay attention to RADIO x BAUD RATE command; /archives//html/TRLog/2006-10/msg00044.html (7,778 bytes)
4. Re: [Trlog] FW: TR683 with TenTec Orion? (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:15:41 -0400; I'm still a true believer in 6.69, and nothing later. 73, Steve, N2IC _______________________________________________ Trlog mailing list Trlog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi; /archives//html/TRLog/2006-10/msg00045.html (7,597 bytes)
5. Re: [Trlog] FW: TR683 with TenTec Orion? (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 09:20:50 -0700; If anyone needs this - I'll post it later tonight. Tree _______________________________________________ Trlog mailing list Trlog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog; /archives//html/TRLog/2006-10/msg00046.html (7,090 bytes)
6. Re: [Trlog] FW: TR683 with TenTec Orion? (score: 1): Author: "David Hachadorian" <k6ll@adelphia.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:22:04 -0000; -- 6.78 seems to be ok. 6.78 is 6.77 plus a special 6.78 distribution of tr.exe and tr.ovr Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma, AZ _______________________________________________ Trlog mailing list Trlog@con; /archives//html/TRLog/2006-10/msg00047.html (7,679 bytes)
7. Re: [Trlog] FW: TR683 with TenTec Orion? (score: 1): Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:12:34 -0700; I use 6.78 because it does some things with split on the 2nd radio that I am not sure are in 6.69. I have not used the newer ones yet - maybe this weekend. -- George Fremin III - K5TR geoiii@kkn.net; /archives//html/TRLog/2006-10/msg00048.html (7,718 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]