Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Trlog\]\s+Packet\s+issues\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Trlog\]\s+Packet\s+issues\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Trlog] Packet issues (score: 1): Author: paule at sfu.ca (paule@sfu.ca); Date: Mon Jan 27 12:38:35 2003; This last weekend during the 160 meter contest, I discovered that if the multi port is enabled, you cannot get the packet window to stay open, (We had one of the networked computers setup specificall; /archives//html/TRLog/2003-01/msg00125.html (7,130 bytes)
2. [Trlog] Packet issues (score: 1): Author: ve6jy at freenet.edmonton.ab.ca (VE6JY Don Moman); Date: Mon Jan 27 14:13:28 2003; The window has always closed when the multi port is enabled, otherwise the networking will hang. I suspect DOS issues prevent handling it any other way. As to the buffer question, I thought you could; /archives//html/TRLog/2003-01/msg00126.html (8,185 bytes)
3. [Trlog] Packet issues (score: 1): Author: rrossi at btv.ibm.com (Ron D. Rossi); Date: Mon Jan 27 17:30:45 2003; WAD. The packet window has a timeout associated with it. It is two seconds with the multiport active. It sounds like you would like to monitor the activity real time and not control the TNC. Is this; /archives//html/TRLog/2003-01/msg00127.html (7,879 bytes)
4. [Trlog] Packet issues (score: 1): Author: "Michael Gulbranson" <wg0m@aol.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 07:44:13 -0600; Hi All: I need help getting packet working again. I am running 6.79. I just set up a new box that has dual boot capabilities; XP and DOS. I am migrating from a W98 box that I have used for more than; /archives//html/TRLog/2011-11/msg00026.html (7,393 bytes)
5. Re: [Trlog] Packet issues (score: 1): Author: Kevin Schmidt <w9cf@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:54:58 -0700; I may be wrong, but I don't think having two ports at the same address will work under DOS. I am nearly certain it won't work with TR. I assume the byterunner ports' addresses that conflict can be ch; /archives//html/TRLog/2011-11/msg00027.html (6,885 bytes)
6. Re: [Trlog] Packet issues (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:18:36 -0800; This is true. Two serial ports can have the same IRQ - but not the same port address. Tree _______________________________________________ Trlog mailing list Trlog@contesting.com http://lists.contest; /archives//html/TRLog/2011-11/msg00028.html (7,659 bytes)
7. Re: [Trlog] Packet issues (score: 1): Author: "Michael Gulbranson" <wg0m@aol.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 21:03:24 -0600; I can't remember exactly what happened, but I do know the 3f8 showed up for comm. 1 in device manager "resources" as well as when I ran VSShow for the byterunner card. I need to revisit this again...; /archives//html/TRLog/2011-11/msg00029.html (8,878 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]