Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Trlog\]\s+TR\-Log\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Trlog] TR-Log (score: 1)
Author: F2JD at aol.com (F2JD@aol.com)
Date: Fri Jun 13 05:57:00 2003
I just wanted to add my thanks to the list for Rons support. Good Luck Gerard F. JACOT F2JD - G0SHN http://f2jd.free.fr/
/archives//html/TRLog/2003-06/msg00020.html (5,905 bytes)

2. [TRLog] TR-Log (score: 1)
Author: joe@puppsr1.princeton.edu (Joe Taylor)
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 1999 20:36:18 -0500
Tree -- I noticed when preparing my log for submission after the CW SS that the Cabrillo file produced by running POST on the log does not conform exactly to the format posted on the Web and printed
/archives//html/TRLog/1999-12/msg00042.html (9,565 bytes)

3. [TRLog] TR-Log (score: 1)
Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com)
Date: 6 Dec 1999 06:18:56 -0000
Correct. I haven't really gotten the Cabrillo format done for anything but the SS and CQ WW. I will work on it in the next week or so. Tree -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Sub
/archives//html/TRLog/1999-12/msg00043.html (8,866 bytes)

4. [TRLog] TR-Log (score: 1)
Author: kc5ajx@hotmail.com (Rick Bullon)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 1999 09:56:05 GMT
-- Does this mean we shouldn't use the Cabrillo format for the upcoming ARRL 10 meter contest? ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotma
/archives//html/TRLog/1999-12/msg00045.html (7,363 bytes)

5. [TRLog] TR-Log (score: 1)
Author: kc5ajx@hotmail.com (Rick Bullon)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 1999 09:56:34 GMT
-- Does this mean we shouldn't use the Cabrillo format for the upcoming ARRL 10 meter contest? ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotma
/archives//html/TRLog/1999-12/msg00046.html (7,339 bytes)

6. [TRLog] TR-Log (score: 1)
Author: kc5ajx@hotmail.com (Rick Bullon)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 1999 09:56:52 GMT
-- Does this mean we shouldn't use the Cabrillo format for the upcoming ARRL 10 meter contest? ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotma
/archives//html/TRLog/1999-12/msg00047.html (7,359 bytes)

7. [TRLog] TR-Log (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 1999 08:38:01 -0500
My understanding is that the Cabrillo format isn't required by ARRL till next year. 73, Pete N4ZR Sometimes a tower is just a tower -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions:
/archives//html/TRLog/1999-12/msg00051.html (7,578 bytes)

8. [TRLog] TR-Log (score: 1)
Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com)
Date: 6 Dec 1999 14:53:32 -0000
It means when you send in your log after the contest - you should either use the old ARRL format (which is still acceptable), or have a new version of POST that has Cabrillo implemented for the ARRL
/archives//html/TRLog/1999-12/msg00052.html (7,521 bytes)

9. [TRLog] TR-Log (score: 1)
Author: joe@puppsr1.princeton.edu (Joe Taylor)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 1999 14:53:16 -0500
-- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-trlog@contesting.com Feature Wishlist:
/archives//html/TRLog/1999-12/msg00058.html (7,535 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu