Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Trlog\]\s+TR\s+6\.59\s+Cabrillo\s+wrong\s+in\s+SAC\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Trlog\]\s+TR\s+6\.59\s+Cabrillo\s+wrong\s+in\s+SAC\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [Trlog] TR 6.59 cabrillo wrong in SAC (score: 1): Author: "OZ8AE J. Christensen" <oz8ae@mail.tele.dk>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:34:59 +0100; Using TR 6.59 and very satisfied with this (the last one I received way back). It runs fine in all contests for me and do what I expect it to do. However, I have submitted my SAC CW log as a Cabrillo; /archives//html/TRLog/2003-11/msg00218.html (7,189 bytes)
2. Re: [Trlog] TR 6.59 cabrillo wrong in SAC (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:03:36 -0600; Well, the first issue I have is that the SAC is not listed on the Cabrillo spec web page - therefore it isn't really correct to say there is a Cabrillo standard for the SAC contest. I use that as my; /archives//html/TRLog/2003-11/msg00220.html (7,666 bytes)
3. Re: [Trlog] TR 6.59 cabrillo wrong in SAC (score: 1): Author: "SM5AJV" <sm5ajv@chello.se>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 22:38:36 +0100; Cabrillo for SAC is OK if you use TR 6.61 or later. The only 2 things you have to change is: 1. Change 'CONTEST: SAC' to 'CONTEST: SAC-CW' or 'CONTEST: SAC-SSB' 2. Remove the mode indication in the '; /archives//html/TRLog/2003-11/msg00223.html (8,190 bytes)
4. Re: [Trlog] TR 6.59 cabrillo wrong in SAC (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:46:31 +0000; SM5AJV missed something with: Cabrillo for SAC is OK if you use TR 6.61 or later. The only 2 things you have to change is: 1. Change 'CONTEST: SAC' to 'CONTEST: SAC-CW' or 'CONTEST: SAC-SSB' 2. Remov; /archives//html/TRLog/2003-11/msg00229.html (8,739 bytes)
5. [Trlog] TR 6.59 Cabrillo wrong in SAC (score: 1): Author: Jan-Eric Rehn - SM3CER <jan-eric.rehn@telia.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:04:15 +0000; Hello Tree, Brett, Ingo, Joergen and all other TR-lovers, I'm also one of the TR-lovers... However, I don't understand what's wrong with the SAC Cabrillo format. I am one of the "bodgers", maybe the; /archives//html/TRLog/2003-11/msg00232.html (18,725 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]