Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lu6etb\@cvtci\.com\.ar\:\s+\[Trlog\]\s+WPX\s+Multi\-Single\s+numbering\]\]\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [lu6etb@cvtci.com.ar: [Trlog] WPX Multi-Single numbering]] (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 17:06:09 -0600
Here is the answer to Arturo's question: From: "merchant@garlic.com" <merchant@garlic.com> To: tree@kkn.net Subject: RE: [lu6etb@cvtci.com.ar: [Trlog] WPX Multi-Single numbering] Date: Thu, 25 Mar 20
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-03/msg00030.html (9,758 bytes)

2. RE: [lu6etb@cvtci.com.ar: [Trlog] WPX Multi-Single numbering]] (score: 1)
Author: "Arturo Gargarella-LU6ETB" <lu6etb@cvtci.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:39:53 -0300
Do you mean "serial number by band" in both stations? I believe, that's not what the rules say. Isn't it a similar situation in multi-2 ?. Anyway, there was a change and I will do single-op (Not beca
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-03/msg00031.html (11,671 bytes)

3. RE: [lu6etb@cvtci.com.ar: [Trlog] WPX Multi-Single numbering]] (score: 1)
Author: "Arturo Gargarella-LU6ETB" <lu6etb@cvtci.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:52:38 -0300
I did not understand that the answer came directly from CQ WPX Manager. I'm sorry for that. Thanks, once again, Arturo Here is the answer to Arturo's question: From: "merchant@garlic.com" <merchant@g
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-03/msg00032.html (11,052 bytes)

4. Re: [lu6etb@cvtci.com.ar: [Trlog] WPX Multi-Single numbering]] (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:04:27 -0600
Yes. That is correct, but K6AW is now the WPX chairman. Yes - same answer. Tree _______________________________________________ Trlog mailing list Trlog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai
/archives//html/TRLog/2004-03/msg00033.html (7,473 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu