Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Auto\-CQ\s+Time\s+Adjustment\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Auto\-CQ\s+Time\s+Adjustment\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Auto-CQ Time Adjustment (score: 1): Author: merchant@silcom.com (Steve Merchant); Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 10:18:44 -0800; As a former user of the Brand "C" program, I am used to being able to input tenths of a second adjustments to the time interval between auto-CQ's. I think Tree's implementation of the Auto-CQ feature; /archives//html/TRLog/1996-11/msg00184.html (7,294 bytes)
2. Auto-CQ Time Adjustment (score: 1): Author: k1am@ids.net (Jeff Bouvier); Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 15:16:16 +0200; Hi Steve, Funny you mention that. I was thinking the exact same thing during the contest. I would prefer 3.5 seconds. 2.5 is too short. Remember you have to use your RIT to tune 200 hz. each side of; /archives//html/TRLog/1996-11/msg00185.html (8,182 bytes)
3. Auto-CQ Time Adjustment (score: 1): Author: merchant@silcom.com (Steve Merchant); Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 12:41:06 -0800; Hi, Jeff -- I agree -- sometimes you have to adjust for a variety of things -- like K3ZO's bio breaks, hi. But a .5 sec variable would give me all the granularity I would need -- the tenths of a seco; /archives//html/TRLog/1996-11/msg00186.html (8,834 bytes)
4. Auto-CQ Time Adjustment (score: 1): Author: geoiii@bga.com (george fremin iii); Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 23:27:15 -0600 (CST); I will add this to the TO DO list. Thanks -- George Fremin III Austin, Texas C.K.U. "Where is the line noise?" -Trey N5KO K5TR 512/416-7010 geoiii@bga.com; /archives//html/TRLog/1996-11/msg00190.html (6,768 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]