Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*QSL\s+Labels\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*QSL\s+Labels\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. QSL labels (score: 1): Author: jdcolson@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu (Jack D.Colson); Date: Mon, 4 Nov 1996 14:09:52 -0500; I was wondering if version 5.86 of TR supports printing of older logs? Will it print specific labels as long as the log file is in its directory? Is a specific file name required? Reason I ask is I a; /archives//html/TRLog/1996-11/msg00015.html (6,523 bytes)
2. QSL Labels (score: 1): Author: tree@lady.axian.com (Larry Tyree); Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 08:46:50 -0800 (PST); Well, folks... here is my thinking about this. Actually, I haven't thought much about QSL labels in a long time. But, it seems I need to decide what importance they are going to have in TR Log. When; /archives//html/TRLog/1996-11/msg00080.html (7,622 bytes)
3. QSL Labels (score: 1): Author: WJ2O@aol.com (WJ2O@aol.com); Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 17:13:35 -0500; Hi gang, I can't agree more. Why should Tree write something that's already on the market. Besides my own program, I have a half dozen good competors that import TR log files and print out your label; /archives//html/TRLog/1996-11/msg00086.html (8,344 bytes)
4. QSL Labels (score: 1): Author: je1cka@dumpty.nal.go.jp (Takao KUMAGAI); Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 09:58:17 +0900; I accept this. I use both CT and TR for the contest. CT for M/M at KH0AM because still many ops prefer to use it but I personaly use TR for my own contesting. I'd like to do all QSL chore in one prog; /archives//html/TRLog/1996-11/msg00090.html (7,315 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]