Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:AC5E@aol.com: 207 ]

Total 207 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TenTec] Why Ethernet? (score: 1)
Author: AC5E@aol.com
Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 13:57:52 EDT
I certainly agree it's about time to change to something besides an RS232 port Including a serial port means the customer must shop carefully to make sure they can hook up their rig. Todays most comm
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg01190.html (8,686 bytes)

82. Re: [TenTec] Why Ethernet? (score: 1)
Author: AC5E@aol.com
Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 19:41:43 EDT
Well, if the object is to sell radios and accessories the features should accomodate the maximum number of potential purchasers. I suspect many hams are in my situation. I would like to connect two r
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg01225.html (8,804 bytes)

83. Re: [TenTec] Paddle connector / speaker connector (score: 1)
Author: AC5E@aol.com
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 19:46:37 EST
Hi: The speaker, singular, takes a standard 1/4" telephone plug. One key jack is a standard telephone jack just to the right of the headphone jack on the front panel, the other is a 1/8" stereo jack
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00019.html (7,654 bytes)

84. Re: [TenTec] Orion info (score: 1)
Author: AC5E@aol.com
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 21:53:42 EST
Tom, W7QF, has posted an excellent overview of the Orion. From the operating side, mine works both with my 87A and the Titan. Very convenient, since I can essentially search and pounce for DX and che
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00088.html (7,311 bytes)

85. Re: [TenTec] Orion in the Shack.......Enough Pictures (score: 1)
Author: AC5E@aol.com
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:01:03 EST
On CW, the transmit is excellent, the recieve is better than the Omni VI+. Both native Plus and option 3. 73 Pete Allen AC5E
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00090.html (6,564 bytes)

86. Re: [TenTec] External Speaker -- 307B (score: 1)
Author: AC5E@aol.com
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 11:33:26 EST
Hi Grant: the 307B is an excellent speaker, and it sounds great on the Orion. In fact, the only speaker I have tried that outperforms the 307B is my Hallicrafters R-42. And that big boy is hard to be
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00119.html (7,032 bytes)

87. Re: [TenTec] Clarification on speakers (score: 1)
Author: AC5E@aol.com
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 15:06:02 EST
Speakers are pretty much a matter of personal taste. There have been several postings touting the Radio Shack/RCA $29.95 cube. I have a couple, they are all right, but as a sound reproducer the 307 i
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00137.html (7,172 bytes)

88. Re: [TenTec] Fw : Orion first impressions (score: 1)
Author: AC5E@aol.com
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:32:26 EDT
As my dad used to say, "There's one guy in every bunch who wants an egg in his beer." Personally, I look forward to the operating system updates, glitch fixes, and so on. At the moment, I'm too busy
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00229.html (9,631 bytes)

89. Re: [TenTec] Beauty of Orion (score: 1)
Author: AC5E@aol.com
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 14:33:24 EDT
I second Tommy, WD4K's, comments on the Orion. The primary reciever is by far the best receiver ever to hit my shack. And excepting Japan Radio, I have owned most of the TOL radios and used the rest.
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00257.html (8,250 bytes)

90. Re: [TenTec] ORION 1.337 Tuning Steps (score: 1)
Author: AC5E@aol.com
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 22:03:57 EDT
Well, since I'm still in the "dark ages" with a DOS computer and no 'net connection in the shack I have not upgraded my Orion. Yet. But I am in no hurry since I'm enjoying the out of the box performa
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00328.html (7,160 bytes)

91. [TenTec] Re: Questions about some Orion behaviours (score: 1)
Author: AC5E@aol.com
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 21:52:12 EDT
Hmm - the panoramic audio worked as it should when I had time to try it - except the tones were reversed. I thought at the time that it was probably one of those "been working 36 hours straight, whic
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00405.html (8,545 bytes)

92. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec vs. Inrad 9 MHz Filters (score: 1)
Author: AC5E@aol.com
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 20:13:52 EDT
HI: As a very pleased Orion owner, no the optional filters are NOT necessary for CW. In fact, mine came with the options turned off, and it was several days before I got far enough down in the manual
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00436.html (8,090 bytes)

93. Re: [TenTec] limited Orion reviews? (score: 1)
Author: AC5E@aol.com
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 19:16:23 EDT
I have "set my Orion down by another rig," or actually had rigs brought to my shack for a comparison. The results were quite interesting, to say the least - and the results were very definite when co
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00476.html (9,902 bytes)

94. Re: [TenTec] ORION SO2R CAPABILITY (score: 1)
Author: AC5E@aol.com
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 07:35:34 EDT
Personally, I'm more'n a little amused at the thought of my tuning for CQ's on a second band while working a station on the first band. They guys who do that are a whole lot better coordinated than I
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00517.html (8,314 bytes)

95. Re: [TenTec] Omni-V Question (score: 1)
Author: AC5E@aol.com
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 14:29:09 EDT
Yes, the rx relay is a likely culprit. The tx relay will make the transmit flakey or non-existant on that band. 73 Pete Allen AC5E
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00555.html (6,753 bytes)

96. [TenTec] Re: A note of caution or a cautionary note (score: 1)
Author: AC5E@aol.com
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 13:58:25 EDT
Since the broadcast publication of very private information has already occured, I do have people who insist on ordering items by E-mail and including credit card numbers. This is roughly as dangerou
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00697.html (7,471 bytes)

97. Re: [TenTec] DSP in OMNI VI (score: 1)
Author: AC5E@aol.com
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 16:25:20 EDT
Hi: the DSP on the VI + or the Option 3 is outstanding. It's been so long since I had my VI's Optioned I don't remember how good it was before the conversion, but I have found very few rigs whose DSP
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00703.html (8,339 bytes)

98. Re: [TenTec] DSP reports--suggestion/request (score: 1)
Author: AC5E@aol.com
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 14:51:30 EDT
Well, the Omni VI+ DSP is excellent on CW, pretty decent on SSB. Not that it's anything you would want to use during an evening ragchew - because that would get annoying pretty quickly. Just like eve
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00787.html (9,472 bytes)

99. Re: [TenTec] TENTEC/VIBROPLEX PADDLE (score: 1)
Author: AC5E@aol.com
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 08:02:12 EST
RE: the Code Warrior is a VERY NICE little key. I have never tried the Kent, but I have a dozen or so assorted keys around the shack and the Warrior more than holds its own. 73 Pete Allen AC5E
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00005.html (6,725 bytes)

100. Re: [TenTec] Planetary reduction drive on Titan (score: 1)
Author: AC5E@aol.com
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:24:51 EST
Well, my Titan has been my daily driver for a dozen years and I have always been impressed with how smooth and easy the tune and load controls move. The poly sheets are thinner than the interplate sp
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00317.html (7,704 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu