Mail Archive Search: <+from:CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>

Results:

References: [ +from:CAlderma@ora.fda.gov: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [TenTec] Re: # 4 Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ? (score: 1): Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>; Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 06:13:16 -0500; The ARRL is not a professional engineering company and does not have the means nor the technical expertise to test equipment and publish their findings against that of trained professional engineers.; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00094.html (11,228 bytes)
2. RE: [TenTec] Argonaut V ARRL Review 3rd and 2nd IPs ? (score: 1): Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>; Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 11:09:50 -0500; "You can't measure a signal to millivolt accuracy if your test instruments are +- .1 volt in accuracy." I think this is a GREAT point for all of us hams to understand! There is now a discussion ongoi; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00102.html (9,811 bytes)
3. RE: [TenTec] Re: ARRL Rcvr 3rd and 2nd IPs Test Methods (score: 1): Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>; Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 06:06:29 -0500; I certainly agree. And I can see that I made a BIG mistake in one of my previous post by saying something unfounded about the engineers at the ARRL. Based on these discussions, I was way off base abo; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00223.html (25,734 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Ed Hare (score: 1): Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>; Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:10:53 -0500; Ed, Thanks every so much for you very informative post to me and to the Ten Tec reflector. That, coupled with your willingness to discuss your techniques with Jim, the techniques and the process/proc; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00243.html (7,359 bytes)
5. RE: [TenTec] Public Opinion (score: 1): Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>; Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:15:42 -0500; George...you are a tired, sick, OLD man. Take your old and tired comments to the Icom reflector. I know better than to read your post because I know they are going to infuriate me with your total lac; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00188.html (20,728 bytes)
6. RE: [TenTec] Public Opinion (score: 1): Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>; Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 07:01:01 -0500; Hi Jazz, Very well said!! Count me in your group of 'lover's of the Omni 6+'! I am going to order an Orion, but I sure as heck won't let go of my Omni 6+. As you say Jazz, it is the best CW and conte; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00261.html (9,352 bytes)
7. RE: [TenTec] Reply To? (score: 1): Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>; Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 12:49:33 -0500; Outlook 2002 does not work that way. The correct thing to do is for the list administrator/server administrator to reconfigure to the way it is supposed to be. Tom/W4BQF FWIW - The cut-and-paste work; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00423.html (9,242 bytes)
8. RE: [TenTec] help re Omni VI+ filters? (score: 1): Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>; Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 06:46:11 -0500; Tim.... I know you don't like hearing from me because of my comments to W5YR about his anti-Ten Tec stance, but you asked for info on the Omni 6. I'm 95% CW op and have had an Omni 6 for a little ove; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00754.html (9,278 bytes)
9. RE: [TenTec] Operating SSB in Canada on CW frequencies (score: 1): Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>; Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 10:21:35 -0500; The USA's FCC and the ARRL have no jurisdiction over setting any frequency segments of the ham band for any country other than the USA. You will notice that most other nations/countries also operate; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00884.html (8,815 bytes)
10. RE: [TenTec] Orion----Why it is so late in coming! (score: 1): Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 09:02:07 -0500; I'm sure your comments are flame bait, and I'm falling for it. My Omni 6 was delivered to me in '92, has probably close to 20,000 of operating time on it, and has only hiccupped three times that it's; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00109.html (9,730 bytes)
11. [TenTec] A/B testing of radios (score: 1): Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 13:13:42 -0500; Several days ago I posted some information relating to results of testing various ham radios at my operating position, A/B switching the same antenna between my Omni 6 and the other radios for four t; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00114.html (10,040 bytes)
12. RE: [TenTec] Orion - cooling fan (score: 1): Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>; Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 06:26:48 -0500; I totally agree with Gary here. Personally, any solid state radio I have, if it does not have a fan on the heat sink, I put one on it. Doesn't have to be elaborate, just something to move the air sur; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00145.html (9,182 bytes)
13. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter/LDG AT-11MP Tuner (score: 1): Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>; Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 06:39:46 -0500; WOW...return it!! If the tech gave you than advice, in my opinion, you certainly do not want to deal with them or their equipment. You SHOULD be able to adjust a tuner at ANY power, up to its rated m; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00146.html (9,884 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Truth in Lending!! (score: 1): Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>; Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 06:54:26 -0500; "So, how meaningful are the ARRL test results if they come from a cherry-picked, specially prepared, non-production unit? I agree that it is in TT's interest to have ARRL test the best performing "sa; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00293.html (9,575 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Crows on antenna wire (score: 1): Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>; Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 06:55:09 -0500; "Finally... if a crow is sitting on my wire antenna and I light the fire, will I cook it? - jgc John Clifford KD7KGX" John, you need a lot of help! Didn't your 'elmer' ever tell you that if you have; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00329.html (9,443 bytes)
16. RE: [TenTec] Crows on antenna wire (score: 1): Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>; Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:07:51 -0500; Yea Al. My buddy K1WGM told me that in the late fall, he put bright red CF on his inverted vee wires and the crows slide UP the wires!! Did you observe that also?? (BTW, bright red CF is the only CF; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00335.html (8,761 bytes)
17. RE: [TenTec] Orion, NRD-545, DSP, filters etc (score: 1): Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>; Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 10:23:11 -0500; Tim, The filters were not thrown into the Orion...they are in there for a specific and important purpose. Most all ham radios, to be competitive, must have the ability to operate the FM mode. FM requ; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00607.html (13,646 bytes)
18. RE: [TenTec] Disparaging Corsairs, Pro II, etc hi hi (score: 1): Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>; Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 06:11:45 -0500; Tim, As an active CW operator for the past 53 years, I have a slightly different requirement for a transceiver than most hams do. For some 30 years one part of the hobby I enjoy is full QSK QRQ CW, s; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00703.html (10,560 bytes)
19. RE: [TenTec] Ameritron QSK-5 switch (score: 1): Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>; Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:29:33 -0500; I'm sure no one in their right mind would WANT to us this with an Omni 6+ and I hope your not even thinking about it ???? Tom/W4BQF If you've used this with an Omni vi+, please e-mail me with your su; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-01/msg00723.html (8,115 bytes)
20. RE: [TenTec] Re: [dx-list] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1): Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>; Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 07:54:59 -0500; Very well explained Deacon. I hope everyone will read this several times. The topic of key clicks is just as simple and understandable as Deacon has outlined in his post. Tom/W4BQF 40 wpm has a 3 dB; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00034.html (9,382 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]