- 21. RE: [TenTec] Centurion with two rigs (score: 1)
- Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>
- Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 12:35:53 -0500
- COOL!! But Ten Tec amps have sequenced keying built into them. Or at least mine did the last time I had my IC-781 driving my Titan amp at 80wpm, creating no aroma or loud popping or snapping noise. T
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00392.html (8,215 bytes)
- 22. RE: [TenTec] Help Titan amp and relay (score: 1)
- Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>
- Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:53:23 -0500
- Probably because I usually exceed the full QSK rating of the Titan most of the time, I have changed the vacuum relay in mine numerous times. I am assuming your talking about the vacuum relay when you
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00397.html (8,616 bytes)
- 23. RE: [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1)
- Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 06:57:38 -0500
- Jim.... I am an avid contester and QRQ operator. I participate in just about every CW contest that I can find time for. Along with several long time friends, I run rag chews anywhere between 60wpm an
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00513.html (13,316 bytes)
- 24. RE: [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1)
- Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 11:03:29 -0500
- In addition, you normally can not determine if a transmitted CW signal has clicks by listening to it with a receiver!! If you really want to know if a CW signal has key clicks, you must observe the t
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00521.html (13,243 bytes)
- 25. RE: [TenTec] CW Key Clicks and Filters (score: 1)
- Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 07:50:46 -0500
- Since I am obviously technically deficient, would someone mind explaining to me what a 'keying artifact' is and what a 'spectrum artifact' is? I just don't understand those terms and need some help.
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00551.html (10,943 bytes)
- 26. RE: [TenTec] microphones (score: 1)
- Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>
- Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 06:46:52 -0400
- Paul...you must be a rank novice to pose a question such as that!! We all know that you control frequency drift by the way we speak into the microphone...the rig will drift down if you talk across th
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00135.html (8,464 bytes)
- 27. RE: [TenTec] TWINCOM feedline ????????????? (score: 1)
- Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:42:59 -0400
- Something to consider..... Go to your local hardware store and into the area where they sell bathroom tile. Buy their specially shaped drill for drilling holes through bathroom tile, they come in 1/8
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00272.html (11,235 bytes)
- 28. RE: [TenTec] Re: TWINCOM feedline? (score: 1)
- Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 11:24:34 -0400
- O my GOSH!! Now I'm really concerned. I guess I better look into closing down my station? For the past ten years I've been running about 360' of open wire feeders to a 66' per side sloping dipole and
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00310.html (10,317 bytes)
- 29. Re: [TenTec] Open Wire (score: 1)
- Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 07:29:16 -0400
- Ouch!! Here's some nit picking: If the feeders are truly balanced, and narrow spaced for the frequency What is 'truly balanced'? The only way you get the phase in open wire feeders exactly 180 degree
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00410.html (11,719 bytes)
- 30. RE: [TenTec] Re: G5RV (score: 1)
- Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:21:35 -0400
- Glenn.... Great write up!! I think what you did with the antenna is part of what this hobby is all about...getting your hands dirty trying to improve something or to build something...that is why it
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00444.html (12,698 bytes)
- 31. RE: [TenTec] Pegasus vs. Argonaut V - CW Filter Bandwidth (score: 1)
- Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:55:30 -0500
- Since YOU are not a high speed CW op, maybe you could get TT to just eliminate CW all together??? I am a high speed CW op and I can assure you that TT has already slowed down QSK in their rigs. The O
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00586.html (10,959 bytes)
- 32. RE: [TenTec] Pegasus vs. Argonaut V - CW Filter Bandwidth (score: 1)
- Author: "Alderman, Chester" <CAlderma@ora.fda.gov>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:48:28 -0500
- Hi Al and thanks for the note. I've been an active QRQ'er for some 25 years and have had QSO's at speeds up to 120 wpm, using both an Omni D and the Corsair II. I have heard Omin V's running at 90 wp
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00587.html (11,771 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu