Mail Archive Search: <+from:Dan.Newby@cpspet.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:Dan.Newby@cpspet.com: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Pegasus annoyance (score: 1): Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com (Dan.Newby@cpspet.com); Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 08:42:30 -0400; Rich, Try turning off the noise blanker. This gets rid of that signal on the Jupiter. Dan WD4LUR "Rich McCabe" <rich@1967z28.com To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent by: Subject: [TenTec] Pegasus annoyan; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00058.html (10,488 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Paragon vs. Omni V Questions (score: 1): Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com (Dan.Newby@cpspet.com); Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 09:19:03 -0400; Steve, Back when the Paragon and Omni V were in production, I had both and put them side by side on the bench to compare receivers. I'm sure that if the two radios had the receivers specs measured wi; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00122.html (11,540 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Omni A/D Noise Blanker (score: 1): Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com (Dan.Newby@cpspet.com); Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:31:16 -0400; Al, I have had both a Omni A, series B, and an Omni C. The noise blanker worked very well, almost completely eliminating a popping power line noise I had at that particular QTH. Dan WD4LUR __________; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00265.html (8,818 bytes)
4. [TenTec] OMNI D 546 Series A mods? (score: 1): Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com (Dan.Newby@cpspet.com); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 12:43:00 -0400; There was an Omni A and Omni D of the 'B' series too. The 'C' series was the only one that did not offer an analog readout version and was really only referred to as an Omni C. I don't remember the d; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00352.html (12,099 bytes)
5. [TenTec] OMNI D 546 Series A mods? (score: 1): Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com (Dan.Newby@cpspet.com); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 13:44:30 -0400; Yeah that sounds right, the notch filter is what the main difference was. I think the original 'A' had optional filters, but not sure. It has been a while. The Omni A, Series 'B' was my very first Te; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00356.html (14,935 bytes)
6. [TenTec] For Sale: Jupiter (score: 1): Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com (Dan.Newby@cpspet.com); Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 08:16:25 -0400; I bought the rig new last December. It is in excellent condition. Don't believe there is a mark on it. Comes with original cables, manual and box. Also has the latest software update, version 1.17. H; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00064.html (6,480 bytes)
7. [TenTec] RE: For Sale Jupiter (score: 1): Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com (Dan.Newby@cpspet.com); Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 13:20:19 -0400; The Jupiter is sold. Thank you, Dan WD4LUR; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00082.html (6,242 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Keyer paddle (score: 1): Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com (Dan.Newby@cpspet.com); Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 10:51:14 -0400; I really like the Vibroplex Deluxe Iambic paddles. They have what I consider to be a really good feel to them. Dan; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00155.html (7,769 bytes)
9. [TenTec] New Jupiter (score: 1): Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com (Dan.Newby@cpspet.com); Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 11:51:53 -0400; What is this 507? Does Ten Tec have the matching speaker out for the Jupiter now? I didn't see it on their web site just a few minutes ago. What does it look like? Thanks, Dan "Bill Nicolson" <n2wf@c; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00218.html (12,160 bytes)
10. [TenTec] FS: 282 AND 285 CW FILTERS (score: 1): Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com (Dan.Newby@cpspet.com); Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 16:37:34 -0400; My Dad, Wayne, has the model 282 ( 250hz ) and 285 ( 500hz ) CW filters for the Omni VI for sale. $60 each shipped CONUS. If interested, please email him direct at kj4gy@icx.net Thanks, Dan WD4LUR; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00526.html (6,633 bytes)
11. [TenTec] FS: 282 AND 285 CW FILTERS (score: 1): Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com (Dan.Newby@cpspet.com); Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 08:02:13 -0400; Thank you, Dan "John Peregord" <peregord@charter To: <Dan.Newby@cpspet.com> mi.net> cc: Subject: Re: [TenTec] FS: 282 AND 285 CW FILTERS 05/24/2002 06:06 PM Dan, I'll take the 282 filter if you still; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00589.html (8,661 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Wanted: Remote tuning knob for Jupiter (score: 1): Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com (Dan.Newby@cpspet.com); Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 11:23:54 -0400; My Dad is looking for a remote tuning knob, 302 or 302J, for use on his Jupiter. If you have one you would like to sell or possibly trade for an AEA 300 watt antenna tuner, contact him direct at: kj4; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00667.html (7,563 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Paragon less sensitivity on 12 and 10 meter (score: 1): Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com (Dan.Newby@cpspet.com); Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 11:02:14 -0400; Harry, You might check the PIN diodes for those bands on the receiver's high pass filter board. I have had to replace a couple of them before. However, the most likely thing is the reed relays on the; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00551.html (9,455 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Orion (score: 1): Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com (Dan.Newby@cpspet.com); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:33:17 -0500; If you have an amp that runs say 1200 watts output with approximately 100 watts drive, then that extra 50 watts should be enough to get 1500 watts out. If the amp stayed perfectly linear, which it wo; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00725.html (10,627 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Jupiter update (score: 1): Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com (Dan.Newby@cpspet.com); Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 16:43:10 -0500; I saw earlier posts, probably was yours, about this problem. However, it was a while before I saw my Jupiter exhibit the problem you mentioned. In fact, I have only had mine do it maybe a half dozen; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00781.html (9,752 bytes)
16. [TenTec] Mute on tune (Jupiter) (score: 1): Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com (Dan.Newby@cpspet.com); Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 11:41:40 -0500; One thing you could try that might help is turning down the CW sidetone level via the menu. Dan "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net> To: Brian Haren <bharen@bellsouth.net> Sent by: cc: tentec@contesting.com; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00937.html (10,017 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Paragon ll (score: 1): Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:06:39 -0500; The main differences I remember are: 1) Much better memory backup design. Lithium battery instead of 9 volt battery and reduced current draw so it wouldn't run the battery down in about a week if you; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00645.html (8,639 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] re: Let's Talk Furniture (score: 1): Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com; Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 08:58:33 -0400; Another idea is what I did. I went to Lowes and bought kitchen counter tops and bathroom counter bases. You can see part of my setup if you look up my call on QRZ.com. Hopes this helps, Dan WD4LUR Ro; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00046.html (12,638 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] re: Let's Talk Furniture (score: 1): Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com; Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 09:32:49 -0400; Sorry, this went to the wrong list. Dan Dan.Newby@cpspet. com Sent by: To tentec-bounces@co tentec@contesting.com ntesting.com cc Subject 06/03/2004 08:58 Re: [TenTec] re: Let's Talk AM Furniture Ple; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00047.html (14,151 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] Difference Between Omni VI+ and Paragon II (score: 1): Author: Dan.Newby@cpspet.com; Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:08:18 -0400; If I understand it correctly, Stan please correct me if I am wrong, the Paragon and Paragon II are basically the same rig except for the processor board and AM operation. Having said that, what I fin; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00487.html (9,562 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]