Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:GLHuber@msn.com: 555 ]

Total 555 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] OT: Lightning and Grounds (score: 1)
Author: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 07:32:51 -0500
Lightning - NEC - Grounding After going to "school" to receive training on the "National Electrical Code" and "Lightning and Protective Grounding", I came home and immediately did the following to my
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00023.html (24,515 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] Grounds, etc. (score: 1)
Author: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 07:42:24 -0500
My experience with commercial VHF, UHF, and 800 MHZ - 900 MHz repeater antennas at some 35 locations around the US has been that "antennas with a DC ground potential" seem to avoid static build up an
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00024.html (8,939 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] Hercules 444 with Corsair II, Paragon,or Omni-VI+. Is it possible? QSK? (score: 1)
Author: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 06:49:13 -0500
Having used the Omni-D, Paragon and still operating my original Corsair II and Omni VI+ with several Linears and model 253 Automatic Antenna Coupler; the only thing I find different (lacking) to oper
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00503.html (11,143 bytes)

24. [TenTec] Corsair III? (score: 1)
Author: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:34:54 -0500
How about a new $2000 - $3000 box built around upgraded Corsair II technology? 100 W, full QSK, Dual PTO, Dual Receive, IF shift, Narrow Filters, etc. Keep the digital circuits to minimum except for
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00758.html (7,380 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] Corsair III? (score: 1)
Author: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 07:10:57 -0500
Rick, I certainly understand the advantages of new technology radios in contesting. But for those who are just looking for a radio to work DX, a Corsair II with filters and the matching VFO to provid
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00779.html (11,065 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] Latest posting (score: 1)
Author: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:37:05 -0500
AMEN - You can't work 'em if you can't hear 'em. And it matters not the cost of the rig, the number of buttons or knobs, fancy panels, nor digital circuits. If you can't hear the weak DX through the
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00813.html (10,223 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] Latest posting (score: 1)
Author: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:57:34 -0500
Dan, I think you are right about fixing Corsair IIs. It might be the last of the radios an average HAM could repair on his own and not have to send back to the factory. I know that's my situation....
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00815.html (10,492 bytes)

28. [TenTec] Simple Radio - No Computer Inside (score: 1)
Author: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:56:54 -0500
Orion II, Red Dot - Black Dot, Radios you can work on, Radios with Computers inside, Service, 30 day returns, and more; in recent days more exchanges here than I've seen in months. One thing is clear
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01060.html (8,008 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] Simple Radio - No Computer Inside (score: 1)
Author: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:38:45 -0500
Thanks Tommy. I didn't mention it in the last post but I do have an OMNI VI+ too. Great radio for DXing. If there's anything lacking it's the dual receive in one box. And unless you've used the "old"
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01075.html (11,313 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] Radio not computer (score: 1)
Author: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:05:22 -0500
Jim, Please don't be part of 'the silent majority'.... I think much of what happens at Ten-Tec is "the squeaky wheel gets the grease". There's a lot of vocal people in the contesting crowd and a good
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01076.html (8,422 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] Simple Radio - No Computer Inside (score: 1)
Author: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:07:19 -0500
Tommy, Dual receive is accomplished in the Corsair II and remote VFO by pushing in on the RAB button on the VFO. There are three buttons to select the VFO options "Receive A or B", "Transmit A or B",
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01122.html (12,116 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] Simple Radio - No Computer Inside (score: 1)
Author: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:23:29 -0500
it, you wouldn't wanna visit a split pileup without it... That's the way I feel about a radio for DXing.... I want to be able to get into a split pileup with dual receive with a radio I can count on
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01123.html (10,807 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] I need a Titan 525 Expert! (score: 1)
Author: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:43:09 -0500
Don't call me an expert, but I have been running Titan 425 QSK for 15 years. I think you might be on the right track about RF timing and that's the first area I'd look. Anything in the exciter's T/R
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00388.html (9,329 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] repairs (score: 1)
Author: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 07:01:20 -0600
Your PA is drawing too much current for whatever reason. Use a TT 961 PS to protect the PA or put a similar "fast cycle" 22 Amp breaker in line. I've been running either an Omni D, Paragon II, Corsai
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00529.html (10,272 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] Comments on "Repairs" (score: 1)
Author: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:41:58 -0600
Larry, Thanks for the positive response to my suggestion to use a TT 961 power supply (or the AirPAX circuit breakers referenced on their own thread). I've also seen VSWR diode failure cause the TT 9
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00618.html (20,660 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] Mic Extension Cable Doesn't Work (score: 1)
Author: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:03:31 -0600
Great explanation Bob, One of the most common problems in audio and DC control circuits.... confusing "shield" and "ground" then grounding the shield at both ends causing hum or RF in the audio. Best
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00855.html (12,490 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] Radio Science + QSK = Radar (score: 1)
Author: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 09:12:24 -0600
When the Soviets were running OTHR in the amateur bands, (which used the HF echo to "see" targets) I used QSK CW dits to synchronize with their OTHR pulse timing and jam their "B" scopes. As a former
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00103.html (11,537 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] Radio Science + QSK = Radar (score: 1)
Author: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 07:15:57 -0600
Not very likely the Soviet Radar operators were confused.... most if not all were pretty good CW operators and they certainly understood HI HI 73 DSW DE AB9M when they went QRT with their WOODPECKER
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00143.html (11,447 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] Radio Science + QSK = Radar (score: 1)
Author: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 07:27:19 -0600
Hi Tom, I'm not an "Old Crow".... or at least I don't think so. My ECM - ECCM operator status was with US ARMY Nike Hercules RADAR operations. I also was a RADAR Tracking Supervisor and HiPAR (High P
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00145.html (11,738 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] Radio Science + QSK = Radar (score: 1)
Author: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 07:35:11 -0600
Hi Bob, Most of the classified RADAR technology of the era has become obsolete and downgraded. For the most part all the old analog designs are pretty much generally available to the public or can be
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00146.html (13,674 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu