Mail Archive Search: <+from:JRUING@AMERITECH.NET>

Results:

References: [ +from:JRUING@AMERITECH.NET: 1145 ]

Total 1145 documents matching your query.

161. [TenTec] Adding Pilot Light to RX-320D (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 04:23:20 -0400; Greetings TenTec Mavens - I would like to add a pilot light to the front panel of my TenTec RX-320D. I have SOME home brewing skills... having built several kits, including a few TT receiver kits, an; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00349.html (7,895 bytes)
162. [TenTec] Headset connection (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 19:23:34 -0400; Hi -- I am back at it... trying to match a headset to my Omni VII. Background: The headset is a KOSS 3000, originally intended for Kenwood commercial handheld. It came with an odd sort of "universal; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00360.html (7,504 bytes)
163. Re: [TenTec] Adding Pilot Light to RX-320D (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:28:30 -0400; THANK YOU for the detailed explanation ! I think I can do that! I will have my local electronics guru/ham Elmer look my work over before I power it up, just to be sure I follow the directions correct; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00362.html (7,947 bytes)
164. Re: [TenTec] Headset connection (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 21:04:04 -0400; FOLLOW UP -- OK... I knew this would happen... I re-tested the whole mess, and I think I have a new clue: * One of the wires to the microphone element is tied to ground. * So... I conclude the one is; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00363.html (8,936 bytes)
165. [TenTec] Huntsville Hamfest Prizes (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 10:40:23 -0400; Hey... did-ja know they are giving a TenTec Omni VII on Saturday, and Eagle on Sunday, as the super top door prizes at the Huntsville Hamfest ? I that that is way cool. I wonder if I have to be prese; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00014.html (7,464 bytes)
166. Re: [TenTec] preselectors (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 00:34:38 -0400; I would ask Bob, N1KPR, himself. He is an old ham friend of mine. We go back a long time, and he is very approachable. He should be able to make some useful comment. Tell him I sent you. -- James - K; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00028.html (8,259 bytes)
167. Re: [TenTec] WTB 282 250hz CW filter (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 00:37:24 -0400; Agreed. I got the red ones. Totally unnecessary, but fun ! -- K8JHR -- kind of like the bright orange trim ring for the tuning knob I just purchased from Ten Tec. I sure didn't need it, but it really; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00029.html (7,154 bytes)
168. Re: [TenTec] ORION 1 vs ORION2 (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:46:31 -0400; Good Operator Department: How would one use multiple rigs of the same model? I can see why one might wanna try a different rig for some reason or other, but why have multiple copies of the same model; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00039.html (9,431 bytes)
169. Re: [TenTec] ORION 1 vs ORION2 (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 03:11:44 -0400; OK, Rick -- you got me. I guess THAT explains your owning 10 rigs at once. Silly me... I took your statement quite literally when you say YOU have 10 of them ! Ha ! ;-) The much more modest station I; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00056.html (11,271 bytes)
170. Re: [TenTec] ORION 1 vs ORION2 (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 14:59:43 -0400; I will hazard a WAG about the use of external sound cards. In the speech recognition world, it was discovered that some internal sound cards, especially those built onto the motherboard, were poorly; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00063.html (9,868 bytes)
171. Re: [TenTec] Older rigs (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:59:16 -0400; Well... just think... I bet you could have knocked those down in half the time, with a newer TT rig... ;-) -- K8JHR -- On 8/10/2012 7:51 PM, Curt wrote: Not sure why, but remain impressed by capabili; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00071.html (8,492 bytes)
172. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 04:32:06 -0400; Fair question, Mike. I am ambivalent because I am extremely happy with my Omni VII, but I also sympathize with those who have radios that don't work exactly as they are supposed to. I don't expect an; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00092.html (12,410 bytes)
173. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 06:07:44 -0400; It's kinda funny. While my TT Omni VII was in the shop (a self-inflicted wound, I toasted a receiver diode hot-swapping an active receiver antenna... doh!) - I purchased a Kenwood TS-590s, as a backu; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00093.html (13,105 bytes)
174. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC announces new amplifier (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:03:28 -0400; Ah...YES... PERHAPS THIS EXPLAINS WHY TT IS PRODUCING NEW QRP GEAR ! There has been some good discussion as to why TT would produce a QRP product... and I suspect that is because they think there is; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00140.html (10,400 bytes)
175. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 19:20:47 -0400; For about the same money I can buy a 100W Eagle that can be turned down to QRP level, and get it with an internal auto-tuner. That would take up less space on the desk and be a singular package vers; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00141.html (9,862 bytes)
176. Re: [TenTec] New TT Amp (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 23:51:41 -0400; The packaging was also dated. I sorta think the new transceiver comes in an outdated package... I am sure it saves money to use an old case, but I think a new rig deserves a new face. It looks like t; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00147.html (9,854 bytes)
177. Re: [TenTec] 302 remote knob (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:33:35 -0400; I agree. But they had to go somewhere! And, if they went above the keypad, it would make the thing bigger, which would be a different ground for beef. (pardon the weak pun.) I set mine to F1-Mode, F2; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00160.html (7,950 bytes)
178. Re: [TenTec] new amp (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:04:39 -0400; I was thinking that, myself. Here is why: I can buy an entire 100 watt transceiver for less than $800. Why pay that much for just the 100 w amp section ? Or, am I missing something important. == K8JH; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00181.html (9,623 bytes)
179. Re: [TenTec] new amp (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:24:54 -0400; are coming across as akin to "I can buy a baseball ticket to the cheap seats at a (Minor League Single-A) game for $5, so why would I spend $100 for a ticket at the (Major League) ballpark (behind h; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00184.html (10,277 bytes)
180. Re: [TenTec] new amp (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:45:46 -0400; Hmmm... while I enjoy promoting Elecraft here... I think it priced its amp well, and is not expensive compared to the competition. Comparable gear from Tokyo High Power would cost $3600. Other Icom,; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00185.html (10,740 bytes)

Current List: 161 - 180
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]