Mail Archive Search: <+from:JRUING@AMERITECH.NET>

Results:

References: [ +from:JRUING@AMERITECH.NET: 1145 ]

Total 1145 documents matching your query.

321. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 11:03:13 -0400; What does this mean ? Thanks. == JHR == _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00205.html (7,213 bytes)
322. Re: [TenTec] Yahoo groups (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 11:09:00 -0400; Geeze, guys... how hard is it? You click on a web page link... you type in your name and a sentence saying why you wanna join, which is designed to filter out unwanted guests and spammers from real m; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00206.html (8,852 bytes)
323. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 12:41:35 -0400; Hi Gerry -- and Ron, et. al.. -- This is what it said in an email to the TenTec Ambassadors... The EAGLE is priced between the TEN-TEC JUPITER and OMNI-VII. U.S. retail prices (not including shipping; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00211.html (8,004 bytes)
324. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 12:53:43 -0400; I would buy that what you describe... not sure about this one. I kinda thought the Eagle looked like price-feature competition for the troubled Yaesu 950 or the newer lower icom models. == JHR == ___; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00212.html (8,699 bytes)
325. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:44:00 -0400; Interesting question, Ken. I think it is a matter of careful marketing semantics. Unique crystal ladder filters... Hmmm... what is unique? A. Is it the use of crystal filters that is unique? - OR - B; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00237.html (9,646 bytes)
326. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 21:19:57 -0400; Are we being careful to compare apples to apples? When comparing the K-32 any other unit, I always make sure that I am comparing the K-3 factory build price with the other radio, because they are, th; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00238.html (10,643 bytes)
327. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 21:48:02 -0400; I don't know if it is But it would be swell if it was on the rear accessory jack and simply accessed using an RCA connector. I doubt it, don't know But that would be a swell place to put it, along wi; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00242.html (9,636 bytes)
328. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 21:57:02 -0400; Oh Thanks for the update. Parenthetically, for my better edification, what would be an appropriate jack or output connector for this purpose? Happy Trails. == James / K8JHR == _______________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00245.html (9,739 bytes)
329. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:20:19 -0400; OK... thanks for the uptake. Do they do this on the Omni VII ? Reason I ask is, I am a former SWL interested in receiver radios before joining the ham clan, and the Omni VII has a great gen coverage; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00247.html (9,860 bytes)
330. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:35:36 -0400; This is its chief virtue, I think. Newer radios are all incorporating digital processes and technologies and it seems the way of the future. and after I am a new ham. The Omni VII is my first transce; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00274.html (13,567 bytes)
331. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:03:01 -0400; THANKS FOR THE DETAILED EXPLANATION. Helps a lot. THAT makes sense, and gives it an historical perspective. I don't, really. I only mentioned it because, even with the design and purpose limitations; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00276.html (12,181 bytes)
332. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:57:20 -0400; OK... I can follow that. Thanks for the additional gloss. == JHR == == _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00281.html (10,204 bytes)
333. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:21:43 -0400; If there is just one, that is one more than the Eagle will allow. I think leaving off a pan adapter output on a $1800 rig is unconscionable. I should not have to cobble one into the rig myself. I say; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00287.html (10,572 bytes)
334. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 01:47:33 -0400; Rich -- I appreciate your position. Nevertheless, I think I represent a different market segment. Seems like everyone would create the new radio in 1) their own image, and 2) make it as simple and tr; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00311.html (20,951 bytes)
335. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:39:59 -0400; I think the value in the rig is twofold: 1) John Henry says it will be of a modular design, a model for future rig design, easily fixed and updated. 2) If you read the specs, it looks like a fairly u; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00352.html (8,479 bytes)
336. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle inflation costs, etc. (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 01:13:12 -0400; Oh NO, not at all Andy... Because if we believe all the nostalgic banter, then we would realize radios were so much better in days gone by, as if radio is on a reverse technological drift, where Coll; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00390.html (11,492 bytes)
337. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle inflation costs, etc. (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 01:56:26 -0400; Yep - I thought so ! ;-) Then, why would anyone want a new radio ? How did this happen ? OK... I am being sarcastic, but really, all this chatter about how good it was in the old days is getting me d; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00394.html (11,852 bytes)
338. Re: [TenTec] Eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 01:59:19 -0400; * DING ! Perhaps they don't understand what it is. * DING ! Bet-cha I can beat-cha with one rig tied behind my back... ;-) OK... just poking some fun. Nothing serious here. BUT ...I WANT a rig with; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00395.html (10,589 bytes)
339. Re: [TenTec] The Unique Eagle (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:06:22 -0400; Gee I sure hope so. But it COULD be argued that the Eagle has a sort of retro appearance, and perhaps that will appeal the LARGE portion of the ham community, who is, frankly, an older, aging demogra; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00396.html (8,602 bytes)
340. Re: [TenTec] The Eagle inflation costs, etc. (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:52:09 -0400; Nice post, Joe. A lot of buckshot in that one shell. Thank - especially for replying in the spirit I intended my post in. Maybe this Eagle is the right balance between old style and approach and new; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-09/msg00399.html (11,176 bytes)

Current List: 321 - 340
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]