Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:JRUING@AMERITECH.NET: 1145 ]

Total 1145 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] Hamfests in general (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:30:16 -0500
Or course, you can lose customers at a Hamfest, as well as make them. A couple of years ago, I drove the 350 miles (one way) to Dayton, just to buy a particular auto tuner. The engineer (no longer wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00281.html (11,118 bytes)

62. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec "Speculator" (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:44:22 -0500
Ha! I like it. -- K8JHR -- Being a brand-new Ten Tec fan, I can sense another possibility for changing marketing strategy. Maybe Ten Tec has the market share that they feel they can handle while main
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00282.html (7,945 bytes)

63. Re: [TenTec] Hamfests in general (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:30:20 -0500
Shoot, Rick. You were LUCKY they were only drinking beer. Wait until you try to outdo the Scottish guys drinking WHISKY ! I have tried, and is brutal. -- JHR -- In trying to keep pace with them both
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00289.html (9,851 bytes)

64. Re: [TenTec] Hamfests in general (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:48:45 -0500
Yes, but you may still owe USE TAX to your home state on purchases made over the Internet and through mail order houses. You really don't escape the tax, entirely. It can exceed the sales tax, depend
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00291.html (10,718 bytes)

65. Re: [TenTec] External Speaker for Paragon II (307G) (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:31:17 -0500
I think Ten Tec, itself, modified and improved those old radios... by producing its current product line. Besides, if they were so great, they would not need so much modification. [OK... just poking
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00300.html (9,119 bytes)

66. Re: [TenTec] Balaned Tuner (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 13:50:56 -0500
Yes. Rick DJ0IP put me on to these about a year ago - I thought they looked particularly elegant with their clean, simple appearing design, and I like the plexiglass tops. They plain look good - He s
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00313.html (7,996 bytes)

67. Re: [TenTec] External Speaker for Paragon II (307G) (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:16:23 -0500
Speaker quality is a very subjective matter. Asking if a guy likes a speaker is like asking if he likes a certain bourbon better than another - the answer is inherently personal and subjective. Ask a
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00317.html (15,598 bytes)

68. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS TOMORROW (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 02:18:07 -0500
I am kinda confused. As part of a team that holds a record in the Michigan QSO party, I thought I understood how these QSO Parties work. I cannot imagine how they could conduct a state QSO Party on a
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00326.html (16,639 bytes)

69. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC 40 METER NET UPDATE (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 21:56:13 -0500
Hi gang -- can anyone tell me the name and call sign of the relay operator in Colorado who pitched in on the 20 meter net today? Thanks. -- K8JHR --
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00342.html (7,011 bytes)

70. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC NET UPDATE (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 21:58:06 -0500
Yes. I made it to the 20 m net, and he and the relay in Colo. moved us along smoothly. -- K8JHR -- He is doing a great job. ____________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00343.html (7,365 bytes)

71. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC 40 METER & 20 METER NET RESULTS (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:18:19 -0500
Thank, John. I especially appreciated the courtesy I received from the two relays stations on 20m, and how smoothly NC and the relays worked together. See ya next week. -- K8JHR -- thank Lloyd N2KPC
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00346.html (7,479 bytes)

72. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS TOMORROW (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:19:23 -0500
Thank you for the uptake Jim. -- K8JHR -- _____________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00349.html (8,174 bytes)

73. Re: [TenTec] Hamfests in general (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:02:26 -0500
You kidding ? Rick IS one of the main men behind Spiderbeam Antennas ! He is just too modest to toot his horn and is too polite to pitch sales to us here, so he does not mention it much. -- K8JHR --
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00353.html (9,020 bytes)

74. Re: [TenTec] UPDATED TEN-TEC NET RESULTS ROM SUNDAY 2-24-2013 (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 04:17:23 -0500
Thanks, John -- Looks like a lot of work going on behind the scenes. -- K8JHR -- . . . update about the TT nets . . . ___________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00359.html (7,316 bytes)

75. Re: [TenTec] Fw: Fw: 68 Group Sunday's (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:34:59 -0500
Much tempest in a teapot. This should not be a matter for the discussion group. You conducted yourself appropriately, and you and they adjusted as expected. Therefore, there is no need to hash this o
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00377.html (12,648 bytes)

76. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:29:30 -0500
YES - the author makes a good case for using something tailored to the task. Thinking along the same lines, I recently purchased a B*I*C center channel speaker for my rig. The article is correct, tha
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00379.html (10,658 bytes)

77. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:10:30 -0500
On 2/27/2013 3:19 AM, Jim Brown wrote: On 2/26/2013 10:29 PM, Richards wrote: YES - the author makes a good case for using something tailored to the task. Bullsh&t. There is no need to get crude or a
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00403.html (19,473 bytes)

78. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:42:30 -0500
___________________________________________ No... not the prettiest one for sure. ;-) ____________________ JHR __________________ .
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00404.html (10,158 bytes)

79. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:14:06 -0500
Exactly... I would hate to have a serious wood-worker critique my homemade speaker boxes !! ;-) What a great group. We have wrestled over microphones, headphones, and now speakers... and remain frien
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00407.html (10,362 bytes)

80. Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:51:22 -0500
(Hows that one??) _________________________________________ Yep ... that should do it.. now you have me imagining something the magnitude of that classic B-grade-movie-old-Western-bar-brawl at the en
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00412.html (9,978 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu