Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:K3BU@aol.com: 98 ]

Total 98 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Vol 14, Issue 68 - Sensitivity Issues (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 20:37:34 EST
I am getting really tired of this atmosphere here. I try to address the subject, provide explanation and suggestions for improvement. As a response I get "imaginary reality" and the above crap. You w
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00794.html (9,249 bytes)

22. [TenTec] Re: About the incivility of our posts (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:39:42 EST
somewhat ill-tempered (not to mention technically deficient - sorry) and we responded in kind. << OK, let me elaborate. I am for exchange of ideas, arguments, discussing problems, explaining or learn
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00841.html (13,047 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] Re: About the incivility of our posts (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:47:50 EST
Sorry about the typo, should read "You guys..." Yuri
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00843.html (8,628 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] A test of Orion's external CW keying (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 22:33:38 EST
although the scope reading did not change at all between those three indications.<< Thanks Sinisa for elaborate test and results. Quite a variations. I found that delays in keying within the radio, p
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00851.html (7,856 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] Re: Using Orion with existing 961 PSU (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:26:39 EST
understand why the orion pulls 24 A when it has (I'm told) the same p.a. as the jupiter in it. << My Orion draws 19 - 20 A in CW key down at full power 100W. RX draws almost 3 A, when the software is
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00874.html (8,145 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec / Scott (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 20:24:35 EST
to maximum productivity. 2. I honestly think that Yuri and Scott together as a team in the next WRTC could beat anything the rest of the world has to throw at them! There was a time that this was an
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00890.html (7,826 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] Re: About the incivility of our posts (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 12:45:17 EST
any more of that guy's arrogant/ pompous/ bombastic postings. Seems like his rudeness should be enough to get him booted off the list. (I tried to determine who the list manager is with no luck) I wa
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00926.html (9,274 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] Orion Voice Memories (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 09:51:49 EST
you have a longer message that's tough. If you have a shorter one, you're stuck on transmit until 4.54 seconds is up. Is this kind of fixed length memory useful to you guys? Shouldn't there at least
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00121.html (7,883 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] Thoughts about the "Windom" or OCF antenna (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:16:33 EST
modeling; Me too, if I was designing "paper" antennas. Caution to antenna modeling cult followers: it ain't exactly in real life as it is on the paper as produced by modeling software. Modeling prog
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00281.html (8,697 bytes)

30. [TenTec] K3BU Orion Review - part 1, Ergonomics (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:27:24 EST
Howdy TenTecians, draft of the part 1 of Orion review is available at www.K3BU.us go to Reviews and Orion The web site and material will be updated as time permits. Any comments, additions or suggest
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00319.html (7,572 bytes)

31. [TenTec] Re: Orion Review (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:38:56 EST
Looking forward to the remainder of your review!<< Thank you for comments, already incorporated. Now if I can clear the mess from the bench, we will get on with some tests. 73 Yuri
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00337.html (6,698 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] K3BU Orion Review - part 1, Ergonomics (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:32:34 EST
(mushy), the "homebrew" build quality, lack of a zillion meter scales on the meter, the fact that T-T has not incorporated all of this authors (and all of the other) herbal improvement in the soup, t
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00371.html (8,517 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] K3BU Orion Review @ eham.net (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:36:08 EST
on Eham.net!<< Howdy esteemed TT worshipers! Let me try to 'splain few things, maybe it will help. I think that Orion is remarkable in number of areas, so far in my review I have looked at ergonomics
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00383.html (9,890 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] K3BU Orion Review? (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:05:18 EST
Hi Perry, I think that contesters are smarter than being brainwashed by flashy ads. Look inside Yaecomnwood and TT and features they offer, how they perform and you will get the picture. I have pile
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00393.html (7,364 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] Re Orion on Elecraft's Receiver Summary Page (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 23:10:22 EST
if I know how to read diags :-) << They were trained to ask your name, address and ask if you want to buy a cell phone. I always told them my name is Johnny Cash (may he RIP, one of our famous hams)
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00117.html (7,716 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:20:25 EST
73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU What headphones did you use? :-) Yuri
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00628.html (8,087 bytes)

37. [TenTec] Equipment reviews. (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:59:14 EST
Howdy rig warriors! I have been QRL, but reading some of the arguments about equipment testing, evaluation, comparisons. ARRL is doing decent job with reviews, tests, but still looking at things thro
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00630.html (9,465 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] Equipment reviews. (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:54:19 EST
advertising magazine, with a well equipped lab, staffed by enthusiastic contesters and DXers, to do rig tests the way rig tests should be done. << OK, lets start here, this is the most evangelical gr
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00647.html (10,808 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] Equipment reviews. (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 17:11:29 EST
test equipment calibrated to NIST standards at the beginning of each test, would satisfy the technically oriented part of our community.<< I am not going to argue about difference of 0.001 of dB betw
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00672.html (7,664 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] Roofing filters (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 23:48:27 EST
does it get its name? How does it differ from the standard filters with which I am familiar?<< It doesn't, "roofing" name is more associated with how the filter is used. Most of "general coverage" ri
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00951.html (9,136 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu