Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:K4IA@aol.com: 318 ]

Total 318 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TenTec] Problem: Confirmed in Orion II Radios and Orion 1 (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 08:26:38 EDT
I can confirm that turning on the software NB, then NR, then Notch will also kill the audio in the Orion 1 running 2.056 when you go to adjust the Notch. This only seems to happen if the NB is on 2.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00158.html (7,957 bytes)

122. Re: [TenTec] "The Bug" a/k/a Orion II Audio (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 23:37:03 EDT
Stop whining? Sell the radio? Sorry - that's not the point. Fact is - Orion is a work in progress. Can we agree on that? Is anyone going to try to make the case that Orion is working properly in ever
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00255.html (9,401 bytes)

123. [TenTec] Another O1 Bug 2.056 T/R Delay freezeup (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 23:43:17 EDT
Here's a new one. I go to the menu to change the EXT T/R Delay so my amp won't be trying to QSK between every CW character. Menu > Tx > EXT T/R Delay 1. I am not using a keying loop. When I rotate th
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00429.html (8,109 bytes)

124. Re: [TenTec] Reflector is getting effective at killing sales (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:30:49 EDT
Barry I think you have hit the proverbial head of the nail. The problem is a failure to communicate. k4ia Craig "Buck" Fredericksburg, Virginia USA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00527.html (8,847 bytes)

125. Re: [TenTec] V2.055 bug /watch out on 60 meters! (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:17:35 EDT
Given the way the radio is designed I would expect that the Main RX would always be used to control the transmissions and the Sub would be used for listening only. No, no, no I use the Sub as the TX
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00654.html (9,160 bytes)

126. Re: [TenTec] Another O1 Bug 2.056 T/R Delay freezeup (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 22:49:24 EDT
No one responded to say they had experienced this anomaly and I am now unable to duplicate it myself. Gary, at ditsnbits, says they have never heard of it either. Therefore, I am going to call it ope
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00676.html (7,586 bytes)

127. Re: [TenTec] Which one ? (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 08:17:53 EST
Choose the ProIII if you don't mind listening to buzzy-raspy sounding CW and a wide-as-a-barn-door front end that lets in close-by strong-signal interference. Be prepared to memorize a complicated me
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00061.html (7,178 bytes)

128. Re: [TenTec] Which one ? PRO III or Orion (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:07:35 EST
I have both a Field and an Orion. The Field looks like a shiny Ferrari - the Orion looks like an old VW Microbus with paint missing. The Field has no firmware to glitch. Things may not be changeable
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00075.html (8,855 bytes)

129. Re: [TenTec] Which one ? PRO III or Orion (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 14:06:01 EST
Bill - I agree totally with your comments. Under the hood, the Orion is the Ferrari. Yaesu's key clicks are legendary and their stonewalling was inexcusable. And as another poster mentioned, TT servi
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00079.html (8,474 bytes)

130. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 17:14:41 EST
I am not sure I agree with you about the NR function but you obviously now more than I do about the technical aspects. Here is what I hear: In 1.371, the NR sounds like a squelch. The radio gets very
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00092.html (10,395 bytes)

131. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 17:22:17 EST
I've found that if I can't copy the signal without NR, I can't copy it with NR -- Just last night I was working a guy who I could not copy with the NR off. I tried adjusting the RF gain (which doesn'
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00093.html (9,517 bytes)

132. Re: [TenTec] [orion565] V2.055 works for me! (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 17:51:07 EST
The NR function works great with V2.055! My reference was 1.3672 , my Orion's original firmware. Therein lies the problem. If you never heard how well it sounded in 1.371, you don't know what you are
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00098.html (7,287 bytes)

133. Re: [TenTec] Which to buy.... (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 19:23:02 EST
The entire history of firmware is available at _http://n5na.net/orion/ _ (http://n5na.net/orion/) K4ia "Buck" Fredericksburg, Virginia USA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00113.html (7,127 bytes)

134. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2.055 Observations (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 11:06:13 EST
I agree with you 100%. I believe I read somewhere that the NR, Auto Notch and all that had been moved to the audio chain and that would explain some of the problems you note. Maybe someone else can e
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00193.html (8,657 bytes)

135. Re: [TenTec] observations of my Orion with V 1.372 (better yet 1.371) (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 08:41:49 EST
With 2.0555, I hear no difference in noise no matter where the filter taps are set. If I set them as low as 32, the bandpass is too wide, and there is no difference in the noise. Advancing the NR to
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00326.html (9,125 bytes)

136. Re: [TenTec] observations of my Orion with V 1.372 (better yet 1.371) (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 09:58:29 EST
I do send my comments to D&B and all I ever get is their auto reply. TT would do themselves a favor if they engaged in this discussion. If there is something wrong with the NR reduction scheme in 1.3
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00328.html (8,570 bytes)

137. Re: [TenTec] Observatons (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:09:36 EST
Are owners of the O2 in for a two or three year stint like the Classic Orion owners experienced? We are still in a "stint." There have been changes but 2.055 is not "right" either. k4ia Craig "Buck"
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00338.html (7,980 bytes)

138. Re: [TenTec] installed the Inrad 600hz filter (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:24:53 EST
moved the 1khz filter to the 1.8khz slot Unless you only run CW, you might want to put the 1.8 khz back in and put the 1 khz aside instead. k4ia Craig "Buck" Fredericksburg, Virginia USA
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00344.html (7,516 bytes)

139. Re: [TenTec] Firmware Question (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 22:00:12 EST
Gary Thank you so much for bringing back a blast from the past for me. I remember lettering that in Olde English in my mechanical drawing class and hanging it in the shack around 1965 or so. I have b
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00383.html (6,783 bytes)

140. Re: [TenTec] Filter Tap settings / NR etc. (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 23:00:51 EST
The NR function is supposed to determine the signal level in the noise and then adjust the DSP filter to accentuate the signal through this noise. Once the determination is made by the NR logic, then
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00391.html (7,836 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu