Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:K9RB@bellsouth.net: 66 ]

Total 66 documents matching your query.

41. [TenTec] need info on connecting 301 encoder hook-up as well as PC toOmni VI Plus (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Borowski" <K9RB@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 21:41:21 -0400
I recently found a model 301 encoder from TenTec's latest used equipment list and was lucky enough to see the message right after it was posted and called immediately and it was still available. It a
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00363.html (7,325 bytes)

42. Re: [TenTec] Fw: need info on connecting 301 encoder hook-up as wellasPC toOmni VI Plus (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Borowski" <K9RB@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 17:11:05 -0400
Mike, I purchased one of these 3 way cables from the web site below and it arrived yesterday. I got both the serial port from the PC and the 301 encoder connected to the cable and the cable plugged i
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00122.html (11,229 bytes)

43. Re: [TenTec] Fw: need info on connecting 301 encoder hook-up aswellasPC toOmni VI Plus (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Borowski" <K9RB@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 17:52:34 -0400
Good suggestion, Duane. I just disconnected the DB-25 to the PC and the 301 remote encoder works fine connected through the "Y" adapter with the other side "open". I then reversed sides to the 301 an
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00124.html (13,211 bytes)

44. [TenTec] Fw: 301 encoder hook-up (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Borowski" <K9RB@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 22:28:14 -0400
For those following the tread I started about the 301 encoder and the Omni VI Plus not working together was solved earlier today with the help of many, but especially Bob Brannigan-W2EJG, who led me
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00160.html (8,781 bytes)

45. [TenTec] Omni VI+ Filter configuration (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Borowski" <K9RB@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 00:01:51 -0500
Don't forget the best of 'em all for weak signal CW, the model #221 filter which is identical to the #218 except is centered at 500 Hz. audio frequency and makes the Omni VI Plus "the rig" for those
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00124.html (11,459 bytes)

46. Re: [TenTec] VI+ Filter configuration (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Borowski" <K9RB@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:06:44 -0500
Hi Ken, I think everyone may have different preferences. These preferences may actually change with age and changes with our hearing. I have found, for me, 40 some years ago I used to prefer CW tones
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00138.html (8,190 bytes)

47. Re: [TenTec] Sorta OT (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Borowski" <K9RB@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:48:27 -0500
Tom, Only to those who don't know how to set a bug up properly or send CW with one. There aren't a lot of us left but I used a bug from '61 until the mid to latter 70's, when I finally a keyer, with
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00411.html (8,646 bytes)

48. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI and fast switching amp hook up ? (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Borowski" <K9RB@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 23:21:17 -0500
Is that not what happens with the Omni VI's internal relay keying the non-TenTec QSK amp?? -=Rog-K9RB=- The timing will be wrong if you do this. The omni VI will start transmitting before your amp an
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00656.html (9,735 bytes)

49. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI and fast switching amp hook up ? (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Borowski" <K9RB@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:49:54 -0500
Bob and All, First off, Seasons Greetings! It's hard to believe it's Dec.1 already....I had a pretty rough summer with two surgeries including a coronary quadruple bypass plus surgery for an infectio
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00008.html (11,781 bytes)

50. Re: [TenTec] Fw: Inrad 763 vs 765 (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Borowski" <K9RB@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 16:17:42 -0500
Mike, it depends much on which filter you have installed for CW in the N1 or N2 position. If you've got a TenTec #221, that provides the best match with the INRAD #765 as they both have center freque
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00068.html (11,328 bytes)

51. Re: [TenTec] What makes the 238 good or any other tuner good? (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Borowski" <K9RB@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 19:38:38 -0500
After more than 45 years of continual hamming on all bands and modes, I can honestly say that I never have used an antenna tuner and never found any system that will outperform a resonant antenna fed
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00622.html (12,675 bytes)

52. Re: [TenTec] What makes the 238 good or any other tuner good? (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Borowski" <K9RB@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:26:46 -0500
I certainly won't disagree with you and I am also fortunate enough to not require an antenna tuner on any band but 160 (didn't get the built in antenna tuner in the Orion as I don't need it). Not all
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00637.html (13,739 bytes)

53. Re: [TenTec] What makes the 238 good or any other tuner good? (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Borowski" <K9RB@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:37:02 -0500
That would be a good name for them, Rob. In essence, the place to use a matching network to avoid feedline losses is at the antenna feedpoint. Although using an antenna tuner at the transmitter end o
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00648.html (10,345 bytes)

54. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and Centurion (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Borowski" <K9RB@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 14:48:34 -0500
Bob, The FT-1000D puts out ~200 watts PEP while the Orion is only half that. I find that most grounded grid 3-500Z pair amps require about 135-140 watts of drive power before flat-topping to generate
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01181.html (9,512 bytes)

55. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and Centurion (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Borowski" <K9RB@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:36:29 -0500
Bob, In your original post, you did not indicate that you were backing off the drive power of the Ft1KD. Measuring the RF output level you have it set on SSB can produce varying results. All being eq
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01191.html (11,776 bytes)

56. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ question (score: 1)
Author: "RB" <K9RB@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 12:43:56 -0400
The roofing filter mod/addition from INRAD does not require any soldering except for power. The rest of the connections are all provided for with mini coax and plugs on the filter accessory board. A
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00576.html (8,283 bytes)

57. Re: [TenTec] Centurion Amp Woes (score: 1)
Author: "RB" <K9RB@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 15:26:45 -0400
Charley, It sounds to me likely to be a plate to grid short in one of the 3-500Z tubes rears it ugliness only intermittently, sitting idle. This is a common mode of failure with old 3-500Z tubes. It
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00194.html (12,143 bytes)

58. Re: [TenTec] Centurion Amp Woes (score: 1)
Author: "RB" <K9RB@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 18:42:34 -0400
The 3-500Z type tubes were designed with tungsten-thoriated filament material. This is a material much different than standard tungsten, although, grant it, any material heated and cooled will exhibi
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00204.html (14,377 bytes)

59. Re: [TenTec] LP audio filter (score: 1)
Author: "RB" <K9RB@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 10:29:35 -0500
GM Paul, LP makes a world of difference with my model 564 Omni 6 Plus. It seems to be more effective at ambient noise reduction than the NR does! I believe the NR was also quite effective prior to my
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00661.html (8,589 bytes)

60. Re: [TenTec] controlling more than one ten tec radio with onecomputer (score: 1)
Author: "K9RBorowski" <k9rb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:57:14 -0400
http://www.byterunner.com/byterunner/product_name=CP4S/user-id=/password=/exchange=/exact_match=exact (I use one of these since 2001) Works well on PCI buss under Windows, 4 additional serial ports s
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-08/msg00303.html (10,657 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu