Mail Archive Search: <+from:KD7EFQ@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:KD7EFQ@aol.com: 153 ]

Total 153 documents matching your query.

41. [TenTec] Omni VI+ Street Value sans sarcasm (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 07:56:55 EDT; To Whomever was asking, go to www.tentec.com. You can call Ten Tec's 1-800 number and talk to Stan or Scott to get a value, and they're honest about it. However, sometimes I've seen much lower prices; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00955.html (7,223 bytes)
42. [TenTec] VERY Interesting News... (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 07:10:57 EDT; Hello all, Just read on the E-ham reflector under the reviews section for the ICOM IC-7800 that they are ALL having to be "Recalled" to Japan. And some people complain about the "minor" Orion issues.; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00555.html (7,240 bytes)
43. [TenTec] VERY interesting news... (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:26:18 -0400; (This may show up as a duplicate post as I didn't get confirmation of sending this before, and it hasn't shown up yet.) Hello all, I just read on the E-ham reviews section for the ICOM IC-7800, that; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00558.html (7,379 bytes)
44. [TenTec] E-Ham Bad Orion Review (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:14:24 EDT; Hello, anyone notice the latest Bad Orion Review by N7XCH on E-ham? I just find it extremely strange that some people are having so much trouble with this radio while others keep reporting no problem; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00587.html (8,552 bytes)
45. [TenTec] E-ham Bad Orion Review (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 08:00:31 EDT; Hello, I did not intend to start any type of flame war, and I was actually praising Sinista's work with a little humor. I agree with his point that something should perform as advertised and rated /; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00670.html (9,524 bytes)
46. [TenTec] BPL: Humorous (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 08:04:51 EDT; Hi All, I try to stay out of the way these days, but I was reading the RFI section on Contesting.com and came across the PLCA response to the Wall Street Journal BPL article. Did anyone notice the PL; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00149.html (6,544 bytes)
47. [TenTec] Re: New Yeasu FTdx9000 (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 14:02:15 EDT; WOW! Is it just me, or does the VFO knob area have the "Studebaker" look of the TS2000 Kenwood? I am amused by the Pi**ing contest of the "Big 3", that the Orion started. Hi Hi. Kind of reminds me of; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00403.html (7,133 bytes)
48. [TenTec] RE: Orion PRO HX D?? Was Yaesu $10K HF (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 20:54:21 EDT; Hey Jeff, For Real?? Pro HX D? And I thought it should be called Omega. Hope this and the rumored Omni 6+ upgrade isn't just "Vaporware" Hi Hi. 73.; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00454.html (6,699 bytes)
49. [TenTec] RE:INRAD Omni6+ mod (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 13:57:22 -0400; Hello, The Omni 6+ design was primarily for optimum dynamic range / rejection properties. I was told by Ten Tec that they designed it with good communications grade audio response, but the QST review; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00892.html (7,619 bytes)
50. [TenTec] RE: Inrad Omni 6+ mod (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 07:16:24 EDT; K4TAX wrote: It's not HI FI......It's ham radio. Maybe so, but I agree with the 3.840 group that SSB CAN and SHOULD SOUND BETTER. I'm NOT in agreement with those who get 5-6KC's wide. They are rude.; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg01000.html (6,825 bytes)
51. [TenTec] IC 7800/FT2000D/TenTec-? (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:55:15 -0500; I just couldn't stay on the sidelines with the latest news about a new Yaesu FT2000D. It seems that with the number of IC-7800's supposedly already sold, and now with Yaesu joining the fray, the mark; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00506.html (8,410 bytes)
52. [TenTec] Re Tower Troubles at TT (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 20:05:51 EST; Hello Scott and all at TT, If Brian runs out of room, I do have overflow secure storage available, especially for Orions. Congrats on the fantastic CQWW - CW scores and hope your up and running with; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00070.html (6,700 bytes)
53. [TenTec] Need DX info.. (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 10:57:19 -0500; Hello, there are numerous sites devoted to contesting, but I am interested in DX. Does anyone have info/web addresses for sites devoted primarily to DX? Any help is appreciated. 73, Todd "The race is; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00170.html (6,771 bytes)
54. [TenTec] DX info / Future Tentec gear (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 19:41:36 EST; Thanks to all for the help. It was too simple for me to think of doing a search on the net.(DUH!) I for one am quite pleased with my Omni 6+, and will have it for awhile. My wish as stated previously; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00198.html (7,631 bytes)
55. [TenTec] Solid State Amplifiers (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 10:05:06 EST; Hello all, since Ten Tec is still wondering about wether or not to introduce a Hercules III, some of you looking for a solid state amp now may want to look at Tokyo Hy Power's line. They currently of; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00225.html (7,917 bytes)
56. [TenTec] Reply To Ariel... (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 11:29:31 EST; Hello Ariel, Has your club won an event lately?? Hi Hi. The signature I chose from a bumper sticker I saw a long time ago in Calif. and is rather appropriate for me as I have had a minor string of ne; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00230.html (6,789 bytes)
57. [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 06:55:43 EST; I'm not so sure if it's illegal or not. If so, then Emtron, JRC, and several others are illegal, but they get sold in the USA. I dont think they would be so popular if they were illegal. I'll e-mail; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00257.html (8,030 bytes)
58. [TenTec] Re: Reply to W8keb (Long) (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 10:37:04 -0500; Hello, I think you may want to research this company a little bit more. They do not appear to be the type of Clandestine company interested in marketing CB type amps. They also have I.S.M. products a; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00263.html (7,917 bytes)
59. [TenTec] Re: Solid State Amps (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 11:21:23 -0500; Well, It seems no matter how I look at it , someone will say I'm wrong. I am beginning to wonder if I AM in the wrong hobby. It seems that it is overrun at times with Conceited, egotistical, know it; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00266.html (7,333 bytes)
60. [TenTec] RE:Solid State Amps / Apologies... (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 18:52:12 EST; I do apologize for flying off the handle this morning, but I had recieved two off-reflector posts that were very insulting about my posts on here, regarding the legality of ordering overseas amps to; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00295.html (7,821 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]