Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Keith.Darwin@goodrich.com: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] Serial number decoding? (score: 1)
Author: "Darwin, Keith" <Keith.Darwin@goodrich.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:17:42 -0500
OK, so if the unit ends in "9" is that 1989 or 1999? I assume the Omni V was made from the late 1980's until the early 1990's. Maybe 1988 or 89 until 93? - Keith - Yes. 1990. John N1JM --Original Mes
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00393.html (8,424 bytes)

42. Re: [TenTec] Bug = truly bad CW! (score: 1)
Author: "Darwin, Keith" <Keith.Darwin@goodrich.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 07:42:42 -0500
Oh man, don't get me started. I was copying someone a few nights ago who had such a "swing" to their bug sending that it could not be copied, except by the station he was working. The swingster was w
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00414.html (9,513 bytes)

43. Re: [TenTec] Oh yea, QRP - where is the challenge? (score: 1)
Author: "Darwin, Keith" <Keith.Darwin@goodrich.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:08:57 -0500
Now for my second pet peeve. A QRP signal working someone running 100 watts or more. One party gets solid copy while the other must strain his ear to even get a report. When I go down to 1 watt and m
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00430.html (9,664 bytes)

44. [TenTec] Speaking of Argo V - how are they? (score: 1)
Author: "Darwin, Keith" <Keith.Darwin@goodrich.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:56:41 -0500
Bugs / Straight Keys / QRP - that all brings me to the Argonaut V. I've read on the Yahoo Argo V group that most are quite happy with the little "gem" but some bemoan the current consumption which ma
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00438.html (8,171 bytes)

45. [TenTec] Using Notch to tune CW with Omni V. (score: 1)
Author: "Darwin, Keith" <Keith.Darwin@goodrich.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:11:02 -0500
The Omni V does not have a spot feature nor a way to turn on the sidetone without transmitting. Both are useful for tuning in a received signal to get yourself on his frequency. I found a different t
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00439.html (7,903 bytes)

46. Re: [TenTec] Advise Please (Omni V) (score: 1)
Author: "Darwin, Keith" <Keith.Darwin@goodrich.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:53:05 -0500
I too have the Omni V. Mine has the standard 2.4 KHz filter plus optional 1.8 KHz filters in both IF slots. Here's what I've seen. 6.3 MHz 1.8 KHz - Doesn't seem to be quite a sharp as the 9 MHz filt
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00631.html (8,170 bytes)

47. Re: [TenTec] Advise Please (score: 1)
Author: "Darwin, Keith" <Keith.Darwin@goodrich.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:30:41 -0500
Rick - tell more please. With my Omni, I feel the 1.8 filters are a bit too narrow for SSB work. I find the 2.4 to be oddly narrow as well. I definitely get less lows and highs through that filter th
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00633.html (8,938 bytes)

48. Re: [TenTec] Advise Please (score: 1)
Author: "Darwin, Keith" <Keith.Darwin@goodrich.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:06:31 -0500
Actually Ron, my comments about the audio are about the receive audio. Despite the fact I have a ham ticket, I still spend most of my time listening - Keith - Keith i believe there is an adjustment i
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00640.html (8,161 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 48
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu