Mail Archive Search: <+from:RMcGraw@blomand.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:RMcGraw@blomand.net: 2582 ]

Total 2582 documents matching your query.

201. Fw: [TenTec] Omni 6 Filter Question (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 21:34:19 -0500; dB; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00231.html (8,760 bytes)
202. [TenTec] Omni 6 Filter Question (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 21:36:56 -0500; Good suggestion, swap filter positions. If the problem stays with the 250 Hz position it is a switching issue. If it moves to the 500 Hz position it is a filter issue. Yes, the 250 Hz filter is very; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00232.html (10,874 bytes)
203. [TenTec] Omni 6 Filter Question (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 21:38:28 -0500; The gain jumpers apply only to the 9 MHz filters. 73 Bob, K4TAX dB loss compared to better for loss or; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00233.html (9,202 bytes)
204. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 21:40:13 -0500; Does an Omni 563 upgraded to Option 3 say "OMNI VI PLUS" on the front panel? The 564 does. 73 Bob K4TAX 3 upgraded; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00234.html (11,373 bytes)
205. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 19:39:51 -0500; Jim: Yes I do. A 653 with upgrade is a ONMI VI with opt 3 and a 654 is a OMNI VI+. I think in dealing and advertising, these points should be clearly stated. Same basically is true with the Paragon s; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00261.html (13,068 bytes)
206. [TenTec] confusion about 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 21:31:08 -0500; Jim: Sorry, I mis read your initial post and thus answered incorrectly. Let me re-state my text and my belief as to such. A 653 with upgrade is a ONMI VI with opt 3 and should be advertised as such.; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00262.html (15,776 bytes)
207. [TenTec] Dead Horse Syndrome (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 19:27:36 -0500; I like your viewpoint. Oh yes, isn't that why we fill in the "subject" line? If the contents of the subject line is not of interest to me, the message gets the DEL key activated. My other practice: N; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00278.html (8,982 bytes)
208. [TenTec] RE: Confusion About the 563 and 564 (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 19:35:11 -0500; Good points and well documented. 73 Bob, K4TAX With what's fantastic upgrade" eliminate 563 oven problem. USB intermod the change different Pro; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00280.html (11,143 bytes)
209. [TenTec] Paying for updates... YES! (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 20:52:57 -0500; I too agree with John and Mark and others. When I bought this computer, I was entitled to and received free updates for 1 year. The initial price was more than twice the price of the Pegasus and Jupi; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00282.html (13,574 bytes)
210. [TenTec] 563 vs 564 (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 21:36:06 -0500; I too complained about my Omni VI+ level of birdies on 10M. Thanks to the good folks at Tentec, the Service Department listened to my needs and used my well documented findings as to frequency, mode; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00317.html (9,717 bytes)
211. [TenTec] How to Align an Omni V? (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 22:35:23 -0500; Stuart is absolutely correct on this one. I've observed that most will try to tweak a rig to see if it needs tweaking. If it doesn't need tweaking, don't tweak it. Should one determine that a radio i; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00349.html (8,956 bytes)
212. [TenTec] Sevierville/Pigeon Forge Repeaters (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 19:21:51 -0500; The repeater is listed in the SERA directory as Gatlinburg/Cove Mtn. 146.850 standard - offset. Also the PL is 127.3 should it be required. I can attest to it's great coverage. 73 Bob K4TAX Gatlinbur; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00394.html (8,486 bytes)
213. Fw: [TenTec] Omni VI calibration... (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 21:02:48 -0500; of is in transmit than only signal... indicator happens I; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00451.html (11,118 bytes)
214. [TenTec] Omni VI calibration... (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 09:17:57 -0500; The best I can determine using a Stamford Research counter the drift on my Omni VI+ is less than 10 Hz over an hour of extended operation either PSK or RTTY. I've never observed more than this. Even; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00459.html (13,235 bytes)
215. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 22:09:42 -0500; Pete has some interesting comments. Keep in mind that the 7 - 10 ppm on 20 meters is almost 100 Hz and the 10 ppm is 142 Hz error. Now in this writers opinion, that's a lot. As to the 2 - 3 ppm well; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00494.html (12,548 bytes)
216. [TenTec] Orion shown with Heil mike (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 22:35:43 -0500; Interesting. I just read from one "poster" to the reflector that his Heil mike didn't work well with his Omni. Then I read from another this evening that his Heil works great and he always gets good; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00495.html (10,901 bytes)
217. [TenTec] Jupiter firmware problems. (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:15:09 -0500; All this reminds me of a story of a group of folks that were touring a bronze foundry. This location made very large bronze doors like one would find on court houses, federal buildings and the like.; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00497.html (12,155 bytes)
218. [TenTec] Re: synthesizers was Omni C (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:44:25 -0500; I have had my original Paragon since 1990 and also a real true (not an upgrade) Omni VI+. Both are killer radios but the Omni VI+ is better in the receive department. I use the Paragon for my AM rece; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00547.html (12,771 bytes)
219. [TenTec] What is "quiet"? (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 21:22:39 -0600; Single conversion receivers have their benefits to offer, so do multiple conversion receivers. Then there's the drawbacks that each has to offer. Simply turning up the gain to max and listening to th; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00105.html (8,783 bytes)
220. [TenTec] Balanced Feed & Antennas (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 22:06:53 -0600; For years I've used a center fed wire antenna fed with a balanced feed. Some 2 or 3 years ago I decided to determine if the balanced antenna was really balanced. Nope, it wasn't. As a matter of fact; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00106.html (12,261 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]