Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:RaySoifer@cs.com: 169 ]

Total 169 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 17:39:18 EST
John, FWIW I have mine set for 100% weighting and 5 ms rise/fall. The QSK delay setting depends upon the switching time of your linear, if you're using one. With no amp, or a good QSK amp, you can us
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00311.html (7,479 bytes)

142. [TenTec] Navigator interface (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:15:57 EST
I am thinking about getting a US Interface Navigator, and have two questions: 1. Does anyone have experience using one with an Orion II? I see from their web site that it supports the Orion, but says
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00381.html (6,696 bytes)

143. Re: [TenTec] signal (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:44:29 EST
I read somewhere that the signal comes from the German national weather service, DWD, and it looks like FSK on the scope, but with MMTTY I am unable to decode it. And yes, the amateur service is seco
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00433.html (7,710 bytes)

144. Re: [TenTec] Orion/Orion II questions (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:24:03 EST
We don't have a lot of BC stations out here in the desert, but I'm about 5 miles from a ham who will go anonymous because he puts out several times as much power on 160 as W1AW. The O2 roofing filter
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00480.html (7,579 bytes)

145. Re: [TenTec] Earphones for the ORION II (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:26:21 EST
I'm using them with the O2. Sound great, no problems. 73 Ray W2RS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00504.html (7,105 bytes)

146. Re: [TenTec] ORION II CW pile up readability (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:56:02 EST
Tonno, I suspect that you will get as many answers as there are responders, because everyone hears differently. On 160 I currently use BW of 100 Hz, the 300 Hz roofing filter, slow AGC and RF gain of
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00602.html (6,748 bytes)

147. Re: [TenTec] ORION II CW pile up readability (2) (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:00:21 EST
Oh, I forgot to mention that I have NR = 7, ATT out and both NBs off. 73, Ray W2RS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00603.html (6,877 bytes)

148. Re: [TenTec] ORION II CW pile up readability (2) (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:45:19 EST
Hi Mike, No, not that I can recall. What's his call? Ray _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00631.html (7,086 bytes)

149. Re: [TenTec] ORION II CW pile up readability (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:34:23 EST
Nope. That's a new one on me. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00648.html (7,861 bytes)

150. Re: [TenTec] ORION II CW pile up readability (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:40:33 EST
Jerry, Thank you! Last night on 160, I tried your suggestion of turning on the preamp and reducing the RF gain further (to 66 rather than my usual 78-84 with the preamp off). It did help. I am using
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00003.html (7,344 bytes)

151. Re: [TenTec] ORION II CW pile up readability (2) (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:49:41 EST
Interesting web site. I like his "sounds from space." BTW, we'll be away next week. 73 Ray _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.conte
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00004.html (6,459 bytes)

152. Re: [TenTec] ORION II CW pile up readability (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:53:14 EST
I'm curious as to what AGC and NR settings you guys are using. On 160 (CW of course) I find a slow AGC action to be very helpful. I'm currently using Hang 0.3s, Decay 10 dB/s, Threshold 9.84 uV and A
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00030.html (8,403 bytes)

153. Re: [TenTec] O2_dreps_top_spot (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:23:21 EST
Looking at the Sherwood results, one would have to declare a virtual tie between the Orion II and the T-Flex 5000A, since individual radios from the same build would vary at least as much as that. Th
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00242.html (8,100 bytes)

154. Re: [TenTec] O2_dreps_top_spot (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:53:21 EST
Good point. If TT, Inrad or someone came out with a 200 Hz roofing filter for the O II that similarly outperformed the current 300 Hz filter, I'd buy it, since I usually run the main rx at 100-200 Hz
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00246.html (7,630 bytes)

155. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (was: Orion firmware gripes!) (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:12:43 EST
I would too, and would be willing to give up general coverage to get it (I use my Argonaut V for SW reception anyway). However, I would have no use for decoding-panadaptor support or enhanced compute
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00447.html (8,568 bytes)

156. Re: [TenTec] [orion565] Orion II won't transmit or receive (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 01:46:45 EST
Ron, I've had my Orion II for over two years now, and have also tried the FT-1000MP Mk V and several Icom Pro IIIs. They're all good radios, and which is best for you depends, IMHO, on the type of op
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00055.html (7,457 bytes)

157. Re: [TenTec] 811 Amplifier redux (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:01:08 EDT
Rick et al, My AL-811 has 572Bs in place of the 811As, and no other mods. I have encountered no problems driving it with an Orion II, but have not tried to make it do QSK. I use it mainly on 160, whi
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00032.html (6,758 bytes)

158. Re: [TenTec] Twinlead and Balanced Tuners (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:45:07 EDT
Hi all, While not disagreeing with any of the technical points Jim makes, I simply want to mention that I had a twinlead-fed 80-meter dipole at my old New Jersey QTH. It was supported at each end by
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00140.html (8,311 bytes)

159. [TenTec] HL-100BDX amp repair (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:52:17 EDT
Hi, This is for those Argonaut owners who may be using, or considering, the Tokyo Hy-Power HL-100BDX RF-switched 100W amp. I inadvertently fried my HL-100BDX a few weeks ago while trying to load it i
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00240.html (7,198 bytes)

160. Re: [TenTec] HL-100BDX amp repair (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:11:12 EDT
Shipping from Texas to Saitama, via UPS air, was about $120. USPS would have been cheaper, about $70, but I called the difference "peace of mind." Return shipping via Japanese EMS was JPY 6100 billed
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00250.html (7,531 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu