Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:RaySoifer@cs.com: 170 ]

Total 170 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] O II RF distortion in SSB audio (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 15:11:22 EDT
Yes, I only notice it when headphones are plugged in, and in my case it isn't severe enough to warrant doing anything about it. Simply moving the headphone cable is usually enough to clear it up for
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00427.html (8,579 bytes)

62. Re: [TenTec] O II RF distortion in SSB audio (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 15:14:39 EDT
PS. It also happens on CW. If it only happened on SSB, I wouldn't have noticed it :-) 73, Ray W2RS
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00428.html (7,849 bytes)

63. Re: [TenTec] O II RF distortion in SSB audio (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 18:42:59 EDT
What I hear in the headphones is a "classic" RF hum. I don't know what the "sidetone artifact" problem refers to, but since I don't know, I probably don't have it :-)
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00431.html (8,253 bytes)

64. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Sub receiver question (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:58:01 EDT
Funny, I don't notice any interaction between main and sub rx volume. The two are independent in my Orion II (2.037j). I never tried it on SSB, though, only on CW. 73, Ray W2RS
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00052.html (8,754 bytes)

65. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 12:25:06 EDT
The Argo V is a great rig. I've had mine for 2 years and I never get tired of it. But, it runs only 20 W and is not designed to drive an amp. If you want more power than that, go for the Jupiter. 73,
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00113.html (8,917 bytes)

66. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:41:12 EDT
You must be using some form of RF sensing or some other means of amp control, since the Argo V doesn't have a relay-control jack. 73, Ray
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00116.html (8,891 bytes)

67. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 16:48:03 EDT
Maybe it's my poor web-surfing skills, but it doesn't look like the 10W-input amps are available in the US. HRO carries the 1.5 kW job, but it requires 85W. Do you know of a source? 73, Ray W2RS
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00127.html (9,273 bytes)

68. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V or Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 16:55:12 EDT
Hi Ron, I thought so! Looks like a good solution to me, but I don't work QSK much. My main amp here is a 30L-1 which can be driven either with my Orion II (through an Ameritron ARB-704 interface) or
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00128.html (9,252 bytes)

69. Re: [TenTec] O II Filters (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 19:10:49 EDT
David, I have them all, but find myself using the 300 Hz filter only in contest situations. Otherwise, I toggle back and forth between 600 and 1.8. That's for CW -- someone else will have to respond
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00264.html (8,456 bytes)

70. Re: [TenTec] O II Filters (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:53:54 EDT
I use auto filter selection after I've decided which of the optional filters I want to enable. The narrower the filter, the more insertion loss, so you don't want to enable the narrowest filters unle
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00332.html (8,372 bytes)

71. Re: [TenTec] O II Filters (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 03:52:17 EDT
I never had a 565 Orion, but I do see noticeable attenuation with the 300 Hz filter and slight attenuation with the 600 Hz. My default operating position is 600 Hz enabled, 300 Hz off. 73, Ray W2RS
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00339.html (8,229 bytes)

72. Re: [TenTec] CW Sidetone problem (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:39:09 EDT
I hear a sliight echo when listening to Main and Sub, but no over-weighting. The rise/fall setting makes no discernible difference to my Sub sidetone (2.038k). I normally leave it at 5 ms. 73, Ray W2
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00496.html (7,513 bytes)

73. Re: [TenTec] ORION II ver. 2.038k RIT? XIT? (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:02:27 EDT
I just tried RIT and XIT here, and they're normal. 73, Ray W2RS
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00577.html (8,161 bytes)

74. Re: [TenTec] transverters (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 19:23:22 EDT
The price is not in the DEMI catalogue because their 6m transverter is out of stock and "temporarily" out of production. Besides moving to Florida, DEMI is awaiting parts for a re-designed unit. No w
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00592.html (7,762 bytes)

75. Re: [TenTec] 'puter cables for Argo V (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:24:58 EDT
Yes, I do. Works fine. Just set the audio levels on your computer for best results. 73, Ray W2RS
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00411.html (7,897 bytes)

76. Re: [TenTec] 'puter cables for Argo V (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:32:56 EDT
True, but some new laptops, such as my Dell Latitude D240, have no line input, only mic in and headphone out. Those work fine, as long as you adjust the audio levels correctly. BTW, I'm stll using XP
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00422.html (8,220 bytes)

77. Re: [TenTec] Remote rig operations (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:40:23 EDT
It doesn't affect me personally, because I don't have any CC&Rs governing antennas, but around 90% of our radio club members here in Green Valley, AZ, do live in antenna-restricted subdivisions. Our
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00710.html (10,046 bytes)

78. Re: [TenTec] New 7800 reveiw (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:47:19 EST
operators, rather than CW, and more casual operators (with money, of course) rather than dyed-in-the wool CW DXers (like me) or contesters. The other day, I overheard a QSO on 20m SSB in which one of
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00388.html (9,069 bytes)

79. Re: [TenTec] Commercial CW License (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 18:46:07 EST
Even though the Coast Guard supposedly abolished the need for CW in 1999, some maritime CW operation continues, largely through the efforts of the Maritime Radio Historical Society, a group made up m
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00435.html (8,109 bytes)

80. Re: [TenTec] O-II Thoughts (score: 1)
Author: RaySoifer@cs.com
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:11:20 EST
73, Ray W2RS
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00026.html (9,419 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu