Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Rick@DJ0IP.de: 3273 ]

Total 3273 documents matching your query.

221. [TenTec] Just to confust the Russians... (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 13:40:48 -0700
Dear Ten-Tec group, I have just upgraded my ham PC and at the same time changed my email address. The "From" now shows my U.S. call sign, "NJ0IP" instead of "Rick Westerman". I know we stopped doing
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00086.html (7,609 bytes)

222. RE: [TenTec] Finally got a Omni-VI+ (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 08:23:45 -0700
Bill, you should have told us that before I sold my VI+ !!! 73 Rick and more. Hold on to those Ommi VI+ radios. Possibly by Dayton, there will likely be an after-market add-on which will significantl
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00097.html (8,024 bytes)

223. RE: [TenTec] Finally got a Omni VI+ now I need a CW Elmer (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:20:21 -0700
Ronnie, Most of us send CW much faster than we can copy it. Although it's a great help to run QSO's, it's also very important to spend a lot of time just copying (and trying to copy) CW which is bein
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00138.html (10,041 bytes)

224. RE: [TenTec] Finally got a Omni VI+ now I need a CW Elmer (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 06:58:12 -0700
Tony, (and others interested) I need to clarify my statement: I can send CW faster than I can receive and write it down on paper. For many years I copied high speed QSOs in my head and as Bill pointe
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00152.html (9,749 bytes)

225. RE: [TenTec] OMNI 6+ and Iambic (Different issues) (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:08:16 -0700
Tony, Ignore the first bit of my last email. I should have read my entire inbox before responding. Your ideas pretty much coincide with mine. There's one more point. Its the dit-memory and dah-memory
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00153.html (16,321 bytes)

226. RE: [TenTec] OMNI 6+ and Iambic (Different issues) (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:58:23 -0700
Ben, They are using special-purpose contest keyers which are programmed to send the 599 at a high speed and then slow down for the part of the message which the operator on the other end must copy. T
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00155.html (10,861 bytes)

227. RE: [TenTec] 450 OHM LADDER LINE FEED THROUGH FOR LOW POWEROPERATION. (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 22:09:20 -0700
Pete's warning is valid. I've charcoled wood with my 450 ohm, though I was running 100w. Lesson learned. Always use plexiglass of plastic (or your HV feedthrough idea). If you still want to use wood
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00170.html (9,748 bytes)

228. RE: [TenTec] 450 Ohm feedline (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 18:55:23 -0700
http://airwaterkinginc.purification.com/bzmmremotemotor.html Nice ! --Original Message-- From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Rob Atkinson, K5UJ Sent
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00186.html (9,336 bytes)

229. RE: [TenTec] 450 Ohm feedline (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:47:14 -0700
Tony, again I fully agree with you. I understand the merrits of twisting when passing near some metal object - both sides are equally effected, but I've always twisted mine because it seems (subjecti
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00195.html (11,916 bytes)

230. RE: [TenTec] 450 Ohm feedline (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 08:58:20 -0700
The balun Bob has describes is super but huge. It is described in detail ub Bill Orr's (W6SAI) BEAM ANTENNA HANDBOOK in the chapter on Matching Devices. I have always used the rule of thumb to use ba
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00205.html (12,313 bytes)

231. RE: [TenTec] 450 Ohm feedline (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:08:22 -0700
My shack is two floors above our telephone computer (don't know the English name for that little black box). I originally ran a cable upstairs with 4 wires inside (not twisted) but it was shielded. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00206.html (9,851 bytes)

232. RE: [TenTec] 450 Ohm feedline (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 22:37:49 -0700
Sorry Stuart, that's not the answer to my question. I asked about "Link Coupling", not about symmetrical (or balanced). Especially the MFJ is NOT a true balanced tuner... at least not in my books. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00216.html (9,531 bytes)

233. RE: [TenTec] 450 Ohm feedline tuners (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 07:49:04 -0700
Thanks Suart. I suppose the double PI NET would be a good solution too. What I'm not interested in is a double "T" and certainly no single "T" because they do no harmonic filtering, in fact no filter
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00230.html (10,698 bytes)

234. RE: [TenTec] 450 Ohm feedline tuners (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 17:43:02 -0700
OK Bob, I agree that your suggested dual-inductor box will match the ballanced line, but what about the "filter" part? The Link-coupled (like the Johnson and the Annecke) and the Z-match are true ban
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00239.html (14,890 bytes)

235. [TenTec] MFJ-974H Balanced Tuner (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 18:05:48 -0700
MFJ Homepage: <Snip> "Excellent Balance, Excellent Design The MFJ-974H is a fully balanced wide range T-Network using four gear driven 1000-Volt air variable capacitors and high-Q air wound tapped in
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00241.html (10,149 bytes)

236. RE: [TenTec] 450 Ohm feedline tuners (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 00:41:07 -0700
Jim (and anyone else still following this thread), you're correct in that these simple tuners work as well as anything else on the market at any price, however you neglect one important point (at lea
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00253.html (13,920 bytes)

237. RE: [TenTec] Re: Orion - Jupiter Microphone Connections (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 16:20:19 -0700
Maybe it's not quite so simple, guys. To be honest, I'm confused. My first take would have been to tie the mic's "-" to the case ground. Some of you have suggested that. I'm suggesting that this is w
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00273.html (8,956 bytes)

238. RE: [TenTec] OMNI VI+ low power 20 watt on all bands (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 21:05:36 -0700
Harry, check your power cable connector on the back. Maybe the pins are a bit worn and not making a solid mechanical connection. Hello getting the 80 meter problem now fixed a few days ago. Bad diode
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00309.html (7,988 bytes)

239. RE: [TenTec] Balanced tuners without balun (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:11:36 -0700
Tnx Tim, Nice ad (on their home page) but not much meat. Will be interesting in seeing what it actually is. I haven't received my Radcom yet. Maybe it will come tomorrow. 73 Rick Hi all, I remember t
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00326.html (7,773 bytes)

240. RE: [TenTec] microphone questions (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 17:32:32 -0700
Michael, the Argosy uses a different type of mic than the newer rigs. It requires a high impedance mic. I use a Shure 404c with my Argosy, but it's just a hand mic. 73 Rick Need to ask a couple of qu
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00329.html (8,343 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu