Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Rick@dj0ip.de: 3271 ]

Total 3271 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TenTec] Can one buy a NEW Ten Tec transceiver? (score: 1)
Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2018 11:46:59 +0100
I find my Aerial-51 SKY-SDR comparable with my Eagle. I drive an IC-2KL with it to about 150w. But no full QSK. Just fast semi-BK. I stopped using QSK 15 years ago. Too hectic for this OM. 73, Rick,
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-03/msg00032.html (8,621 bytes)

122. Re: [TenTec] Transmatch noise bridge model 1051 manual (score: 1)
Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 10:26:10 +0100
Did you receive the information I sent you directly? 73, Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany) I have an unbuilt model 1051, but, no manual. Any ideas where I can get one please? Possibly mods as well
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-03/msg00059.html (7,913 bytes)

123. Re: [TenTec] Transmatch noise bridge model 1051 manual (score: 1)
Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 15:31:15 +0100
I don't have much on this, but I have a little bit of information: http://www.dj0ip.de/ten-tec-stuff/1051-noise-bridge/ 73, Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany) No, I was about to tell you. If you se
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-03/msg00061.html (9,513 bytes)

124. Re: [TenTec] SSB Problems - almost oscillating? (score: 1)
Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 17:52:36 +0100
Hi Sam The VERY first thing you need to do is put the radio on a dummy load and see if you still have the problem. Of course if you rely on someone elsewhere listening to your signal, then you will n
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-03/msg00073.html (11,276 bytes)

125. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Plus w/ TL-922A (score: 1)
Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 22:32:54 +0100
You need to tell us if you plan to run CW or SSB. That makes a big difference. 73, Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany) --Original Message-- From: TenTec <tentec-bounces@contesting.com> On Behalf Of
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-03/msg00117.html (8,128 bytes)

126. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Plus w/ TL-922A (score: 1)
Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 22:57:09 +0100
Houston, we have a PROBLEM. The 922 has an open-frame TR-relay that is very slow. The Eagle sends RF to the amp, long before it is ready to see RF. This will result in burning of relay contacts; take
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-03/msg00119.html (10,960 bytes)

127. Re: [TenTec] parts (score: 1)
Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 09:49:14 +0100
Hi Ron, Do we have a list of all TN hams with barns? 73, Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany) There was a story floating around that about the time that Ten Tec moved, someone in the area bought a hu
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-03/msg00137.html (10,425 bytes)

128. Re: [TenTec] parts (score: 1)
Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:02:27 +0100
... and probably true! - Rick, DJ0IP Now, that's funny! - Steve, NR4M
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-03/msg00142.html (8,209 bytes)

129. [TenTec] Update on Other Ten-Tec Groups (score: 1)
Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 16:32:54 +0100
Hi guys and gals, Until recently, most of the Ten-Tec groups were located on Yahoo!Groups. Ongoing problems with Yahoo this past year has motivated us to move the groups to a new home. We have moved
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-02/msg00037.html (9,394 bytes)

130. [TenTec] OT: More reports from Rob Sherwood (score: 1)
Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 23:21:13 +0100
This is about radios, not antennas. If you are not interested, just delete this email. Here is a very interesting report, not only for contesters. In the recent CQWW 160 CW contest, Rob compared the
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-02/msg00093.html (7,919 bytes)

131. Re: [TenTec] Mic Wiring (score: 1)
Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 23:44:30 +0100
My 50+ year old Shure 444 also works great with my Eagle. It worked fine with my Orion.... And several OM6's, OM5, and a few original OMNIs. 73, Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany) The Omni C needs
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-02/msg00107.html (8,802 bytes)

132. Re: [TenTec] Wanted: Instruction Sheet for Crystal Calibrator 276 (score: 1)
Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:44:35 +0100
Hmmm, my email with the attachment did not go through. I thought at least the text would. I have posted the manual on my web site, here: http://www.dj0ip.de/ten-tec-stuff/207-crystal-calibrator/ 73,
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-02/msg00118.html (8,255 bytes)

133. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec 228 vs 229 Ant Tuner (score: 1)
Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 22:16:19 +0100
These are totally different tuners. The 228 was a 200w T-Network, the 229 a 1kW L-Network. See: http://tentecwiki.eqth.net/doku.php?id=tuners 73, Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany) --Original Messa
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-02/msg00125.html (8,230 bytes)

134. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tech Matchbox 229 vs 238 series. (score: 1)
Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 20:13:06 +0100
ED, The 229 and 238 were similar, with the 229 matching the old Omni A,D,C gear in looks, the 238 matching the newer Omni V/VI gear. Both used the dial cord and sliding indicator for displaying the t
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-02/msg00131.html (10,969 bytes)

135. Re: [TenTec] trouble with Scout (score: 1)
Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 08:45:34 +0100
The most common problem could be connections between the band modules and the main unit. Try cleaning all connections thoroughly. I use a soft eraser (for erasing pencil) to clean plug male pins. For
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-01/msg00042.html (8,912 bytes)

136. Re: [TenTec] POWERING SCOUT VIA BATTERY (score: 1)
Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2017 09:11:07 +0100
I would suggest using a Gel battery rather than a lead acid. If really only 10w, then it doesn't have to be so huge. 25Ah would be enough. Then simply put a trickle charger on it when not in use. Rem
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-12/msg00004.html (8,468 bytes)

137. [TenTec] O.T.: Rob Sherwood's Review of IC-7610 (score: 1)
Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 08:12:06 +0100
For those of you interested in and following receiver technology, I have just uploaded Rob's recent test review of the IC-7610. It is on my web, together with all of his other test reviews in the pas
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-12/msg00055.html (7,097 bytes)

138. Re: [TenTec] 238 "Tuner" Balun (score: 1)
Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 09:12:18 +0100
Hi Bob, HNY! It might help if you tell us "which" Ten-Tec balun you mean. I will assume you are speaking of the Model 238-x range of matchboxes. They all have a 4:1 Voltage balun which is more or les
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-12/msg00069.html (13,498 bytes)

139. Re: [TenTec] 238 "Tuner" Balun (score: 1)
Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 11:46:31 +0100
GM Steve, The problem that we are fighting is common mode current . . . which rises when the antenna is closer to the ground (electrically). In all of the tests that I have run on dipoles and OCFD an
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-12/msg00071.html (11,393 bytes)

140. Re: [TenTec] 238 "Tuner" Balun (score: 1)
Author: <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 22:03:40 +0100
Hi Jim, Happy Holidays! Hope you are not affected by the fire. You are an expert on theory but you have often said that you do not like openwire and openwire fed dipoles. I am assuming you have not u
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-12/msg00075.html (18,010 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu