Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Rick@dj0ip.de: 3271 ]

Total 3271 documents matching your query.

361. Re: [TenTec] Preselector for SDR (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 10:34:57 +0200
And not very contest-effective! 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany) A well constructed magnetic loop works very well. Not easy to do. _______________________________________________ TenTec mail
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00274.html (8,423 bytes)

362. Re: [TenTec] Post to the Amps Reflector from Dishtronix (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 23:17:12 +0200
I ask myself that question almost every day. The only answer I find is, "it's fun." Luckily we make half our money in the commercial market which enables us to keep selling into the ham market (and s
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00297.html (9,259 bytes)

363. Re: [TenTec] Post to the Amps Reflector from Dishtronix (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 15:08:49 +0200
Mike posted long ago that Ten-Tec was only taking emails, no phone calls. He has repeated that several times since then in various emails. No point in continuing to try and call them. They won't answ
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00316.html (13,916 bytes)

364. Re: [TenTec] Post to the Amps Reflector from Dishtronix (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 15:10:28 +0200
Hmm, make that MON/TUE/WED answering emails. I finally learned what order the days in the week come in. 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany) Mike posted long ago that Ten-Tec was only taking ema
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00317.html (14,759 bytes)

365. Re: [TenTec] The New TenTec (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 23:14:00 +0200
Paul, Partially true, but you left out the bit about blood, sweat and tears! About 3 months ago I had a long phone call with Mike. I told him what I thought the industry needed, SDR, clean transmitte
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00328.html (9,867 bytes)

366. Re: [TenTec] Post to the Amps Reflector from Dishtronix (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 23:21:29 +0200
Some of you guys are really missing the point. To date, Mike hasn't tried to sell us anything. He is only helping as many people as he can with the limited resources that he has. We're seeing emails
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00330.html (11,602 bytes)

367. Re: [TenTec] About Ten Tech (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 22:04:41 +0200
If you have been here long Haney, then you must have become accustomed to the fact that we don't just discuss pure Ten-Tec topics. All sorts of topics relate to Ten-Tec. I've been in the group for 15
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00343.html (7,939 bytes)

368. Re: [TenTec] The New TenTec (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 09:41:00 +0200
As you said, it's what's keeping Ten-Tec alive. They have been busy producing commercial receivers and that project run was supposed to run out in August. After that there was hope of ham radios agai
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00350.html (8,982 bytes)

369. Re: [TenTec] stereo headphones with Corsair II (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:28:47 +0200
Be careful Allan, Some of my temporary ugly fixes are over 40 years old now! ;-) 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany) And nobody actually responded to my question...Please, guys, if you don't re
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00360.html (9,119 bytes)

370. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII low power in SSB Xmit. (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 22:19:22 +0200
What's your call sign, Kevin? 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany) My beloved Omni VII has a low power problem in SSB (LSB / USB) transmit mode. Confirmed the problem with a Bird wattmeter and a
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00023.html (7,843 bytes)

371. [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:24:50 +0200
I know lots of hams like to brag on their new radio but the new does wear off. Many of the users are not satisfied - for whatever reason - and have buyer's remorse. One German retailer has a trade-up
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00077.html (8,861 bytes)

372. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 12:19:38 +0200
Oh I agree Jim. There's a reason all of these dealers have stock piles of 7600s. However the guy I was listening to who did this is one of those 80m rag chewers, and since many of them operate in "al
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00080.html (10,480 bytes)

373. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 12:26:51 +0200
What are you implying, Paul? I fully agree with Jim for stating known facts, not opinions. These dirty transmitters have been reported on often; just read arrl lab report measurements and check where
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00081.html (11,273 bytes)

374. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 19:33:04 +0200
Well now I will disagree with Jim "slightly". I don't think Icom over-sold the product; Joe Ham overestimated the radio. I think they let their wishes run away with their understanding. As a kid I dr
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00090.html (13,807 bytes)

375. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 19:37:45 +0200
Opinions are like... and we all have them. Here's mine: IMO we ARE there now. At least the technology is. The price is still high but rapidly coming down. You must be careful with the term "SDR". Tha
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00091.html (10,781 bytes)

376. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 20:28:20 +0200
In plain English Paul, it overloads MUCH too easily. To prevent that, you have to use a lot of attenuation; here in Europe even more than the radio has built in. Then it does not overload but you can
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00094.html (13,133 bytes)

377. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 20:33:45 +0200
Well many of us are in similar financial situations Mike, but all of us can read and we should just simply read what the OEM says/prints and stop dreaming. Direct sampling is a new technology. This i
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00095.html (11,559 bytes)

378. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 23:47:25 +0200
The overload problem was reported by: Here is ICOM's reply (from an eham.net review): == " Thank you for contacting Icom America. Unfortunately given the extremely harsh operating environment you are
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00107.html (15,514 bytes)

379. Re: [TenTec] Really? (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:13:12 +0200
Tim, you are right (only) about the 7300. Most hams will not have a problem with the 7300 because they do not operate in the environment where they would get this problem. Even if they do come to a b
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00109.html (11,456 bytes)

380. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 08:47:02 +0200
We are talking about technology and problems in transceivers and this applies to Ten-Tec just as much as any other brand. 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany) Ummm, why are we talking about an I
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00116.html (17,026 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu