- 81. RE: [TenTec] Re: Orion tuning rates - Further thoughts (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 16:15:52 +0100
- Just finished 2 hours of shoveling snow from the driveway. My poor aching back is now asking for a Cognac rather than Champagne, but I still have to drive tonight "to" the party. Those of you who've
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01344.html (7,777 bytes)
- 82. RE: [TenTec] Orion and logging program (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 16:13:46 +0100
- CT version 9.92 supports the Orion. I believe WINlog does too. 73 Rick Wonder what logging programs Orion owners are using that interface to the Orion? I have DXBase and it doesn't sound like Jack ha
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00032.html (8,417 bytes)
- 83. RE: [TenTec] Orion on RTTY? (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 12:51:48 +0100
- Jim, that's not fully correct about the OMNI VI+. Although the "preferred" way is to purchase the special "Data" filter, it is also possible to use the standard 500 Hz filter and just adjust the band
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00033.html (7,902 bytes)
- 84. RE: [TenTec] Sloper (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 23:00:36 +0100
- Ken, you need to be more specific. If you don't have a tower, then you have to have some kind of a support. It might be a tree or a mini-pole on top of a house - something. Whatever it is, if it is n
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00043.html (8,126 bytes)
- 85. RE: [TenTec] Sloper (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 23:49:24 +0100
- Sinsa, I do not agree with you. I believe it will work better if grounded. However, to be honest, I am not 100% sure and if it turns out you are right, then I shall learn something useful. As I see i
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00046.html (8,480 bytes)
- 86. RE: [TenTec] Sloper (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 03:11:41 +0100
- Sinsa "Hi-hard to respond" your answer was very long and covered many things. Sir - theory and practice.... First, in theory, how could I disagree? Second, Ken wants to run multiple bands (which you
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00056.html (18,547 bytes)
- 87. [TenTec] ORION Specifications? (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 20:10:00 +0100
- On T-T's website, they publish a transceiver comparison table in which Orion specs are stated, and the specs of the other transceivers are the ARRL-measured specs. On Elecraft's website they also pub
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00099.html (7,439 bytes)
- 88. RE: [TenTec] Not TT - Wire antenna question. (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 01:02:13 +0100
- Paul, I fully agree with Frank. You should indeed switch to 300 ohm or better yet 450 ohm. Once you have done that, you can play with adding various lengths of extra feedline (which will change the i
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00107.html (12,882 bytes)
- 89. RE: [TenTec] Not TT - Wire antenna question. (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 01:13:31 +0100
- Pete, you were fully correct - this one has the potential to generate lots of opinions. I only partially agree with you, Pete. Your suggested feed method is perfect for feeding the resonant loop (say
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00108.html (10,815 bytes)
- 90. RE: [TenTec] Not TT - Wire antenna question. (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:26:17 +0100
- <snip> "450ohm ladder will not radiate, like coax will, because one side cancels out the other side." This is only correct if you do EVERYTHING properly. This requires that the entire system has to b
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00112.html (14,358 bytes)
- 91. RE: [TenTec] Orion Filter Controls (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:07:10 +0100
- Bob, the "Spurious Bar" you are referring to is the Indicator for which Roofing Filter is currently in use. (hi) 73 Rick The Orion filters are superb. PBT & BW controls behave exactly as expected. Hi
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00119.html (9,292 bytes)
- 92. RE: [TenTec] Orion Filter Controls (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:48:56 +0100
- Please add my name to Bill's for not understanding when and why to use "Cut". Maybe we've been missing something by not using it. 73 Rick the difference between the hi-cut function and the BW knob. O
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00131.html (9,517 bytes)
- 93. RE: [TenTec] Orion Filter Controls (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:41:41 +0100
- Nice idea! OK, I'll get in here on this one too! All morning I have been on 20 working dx net etc. I had interference on both the upper and lower side AT DIFFERENT TIMES. I like the way the 'HIGH CUT
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00142.html (9,207 bytes)
- 94. [TenTec] ORION Contesters: HELP PLEASE (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 22:13:39 +0100
- Guys, In 5 days I have the privilege of giving a PowerPoint presentation to about 200 European contesters, with the Subject: "Orion as a Contest Transceiver". Others will be presenting other potentia
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00144.html (7,735 bytes)
- 95. RE: [TenTec] ORION Contesters: HELP PLEASE (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 23:53:42 +0100
- Man, I'm gonna have to take a look at your suggested link because I didn't understand a word of that. I've always heard of 2-tone, never heard of 3-tone. Thanks for the tip. I'll check it out. 73 Ric
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00154.html (9,323 bytes)
- 96. RE: [TenTec] Orion Filter Controls (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:02:13 +0100
- Sinisa, though your posts are always useful, some of the best, it's also always fun to disagree with you! In this case I can only assume we caught you sleeping or maybe you've had a glass too many to
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00158.html (10,277 bytes)
- 97. RE: [TenTec] Omni 6+ Input vs Output power? (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 01:42:19 +0100
- MIKE, BE CAREFUL Yes, the current consumption varies from band to band and when limiting to 20A, you may not always get 100w out. However, the 962 is incorporated in the protection circuitry of the O
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00201.html (9,276 bytes)
- 98. RE: [TenTec] Omni 6+ Input vs Output power? (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:27:49 +0100
- THANKS CARL for correcting me. I apologize for misleading people (in my previous post on this topic) by still living in the past. To be honest, I've had Omni V / VI / V+ since the day each was announ
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00208.html (11,890 bytes)
- 99. RE: [TenTec] better speakers (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 22:04:31 +0100
- Where can I find more info about this "Sounds Sweet" ? communications I agree. I've tried many communications speakers with a variety of radios over the years, and the Sounds Sweet has ended up my sp
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00223.html (8,607 bytes)
- 100. RE: [TenTec] Re: New Titan 3 DOA (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:31:28 +0100
- Ed, I ordered a used power supply too, but was too late. I did not get one. If you like, you can call Ten-Tec and cancel your order and tell them that Rick, DJ0IP, will take it instead of you. I woul
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00246.html (8,084 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu