Mail Archive Search: <+from:Rsoifer@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:Rsoifer@aol.com: 310 ]

Total 310 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [TenTec] Orion 1 and Orion 2 advice (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:44:00 -0500 (EST); Gentlemen, Thanks for whatever wisdom you may share. I have the opportunity to purchase a new rig to replace my Yaesu ft 897d. The Yaesu is fine and I have about 250 countries on it with my log anten; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00040.html (7,957 bytes)
162. Re: [TenTec] Default LCW BW 1000Hz (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 13:57:14 -0400 (EDT); Hi John, I just did some experimenting. I generally use UCW, but for this test I set the O2 to LCW and turned it on. It came up at 2400 Hz. I then set BW to 500 Hz, turned off the radio, and turned i; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00188.html (9,046 bytes)
163. Re: [TenTec] Default LCW BW 1000Hz (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 19:51:33 -0400 (EDT); Yes, the need to cycle stack memories in order to preserve them was part of v2.044A. John Henry wrote about that a few months ago. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 3/20/2011 8:42:45 P.M. GMT Standard T; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00197.html (10,274 bytes)
164. Re: [TenTec] Frequency output from Orion 2 via Cat Port (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:30:42 -0400 (EDT); Dave, The Orion II provides it -- frequency info comes up on MixW and HRD. I don't have Carl's software, so someone else (Carl?) will have to say how to configure it. 73 Ray W In a message dated 4/21; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00270.html (8,478 bytes)
165. Re: [TenTec] new radio (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 22:07:37 -0400 (EDT); An Orion replacement, eh? What features does John want to replace? 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 5/11/2011 9:13:39 P.M. GMT Standard Time, atrampler@att.net writes: Note that with the (re)acquisitio; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00062.html (9,114 bytes)
166. Re: [TenTec] new radio (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 08:34:44 -0400 (EDT); Well, it is "the SSB company" :-) John, glad you're keeping up with us users' feedback. I'll await what your team comes up with. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 5/12/2011 11:40:56 A.M. GMT Standard Ti; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00066.html (9,455 bytes)
167. [TenTec] O3 wish list (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 10:37:30 -0400 (EDT); I've had my O2 (fully loaded except for the antenna tuner) for 5+ years. With that experience in mind, I would like to see its successor have a sub receiver identical to the main rx, data outputs to; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00067.html (9,271 bytes)
168. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 12:35:14 -0400 (EDT); I am mostlly a CW operator, and find that the Orion II NR (v2.044A), with a wide (6 kHz) roofing filter (tnx Bob, K8IA, for that tip) does help pull out the weak ones on 160 and 80 meters. I don't ha; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00111.html (9,380 bytes)
169. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 15:52:48 -0400 (EDT); So, Maybe what we users are asking for is a menu-selectable NR algorithm, one optimized for CW (similar to the present one) and the other for SSB. A software issue, not necessarily requiring a new ra; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00114.html (11,436 bytes)
170. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 14:08:30 -0400 (EDT); I don't have a Yaesu 5000 to listen to, but I think all of us on this reflector with Orion IIs agree that the DSP NR needs further work. It works pretty well (for me at least) on CW, but there is muc; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00142.html (11,333 bytes)
171. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 14:13:56 -0400 (EDT); Carl, I'd agree with that, with the possible exception of 6 meters if including it would affect performance on the other bands. John H? What do you think about that? 73 Ray In a message dated 5/18/20; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00143.html (11,508 bytes)
172. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 19:45:26 -0400 (EDT); Bsrry and Carl, We're all entitled to our opinions, based on our own experience. All I can say is the NR (2.044A and 2.039d) helps me pull out weak CW signals on 80 and 160, especially with a wide ro; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00149.html (9,100 bytes)
173. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Firmware Version V1.810 Posted, RX320D GUI Posted. Pegasus... (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 08:32:31 -0400 (EDT); A few. My Argo V is v1.08b. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 5/24/2011 12:30:12 P.M. GMT Standard Time, kd2e@comcast.net writes: Just curious....Did the Argo V have any updates? I ask because from the; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00192.html (10,615 bytes)
174. Re: [TenTec] Firmware Updates (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 11:42:16 -0400 (EDT); Jim, The latest version incorporates all previous updates. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 5/26/2011 3:34:23 P.M. GMT Standard Time, jliving39@comcast.net writes: Guys, Also have an ARGO V and OMNI VI; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00200.html (7,211 bytes)
175. Re: [TenTec] Using Ten-Tec mics with Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:18:23 -0400 (EDT); Doug, I don't have an Omni VI+ but my main rig is also an Orion II. When I switched from an electret 706 to a dynamic 707, I had to move the H/W mic gain setting from 0 (default) to +12.0. With the 7; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-06/msg00112.html (7,090 bytes)
176. Re: [TenTec] Using Ten-Tec mics with Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:57:25 -0400 (EDT); Right, Jim. Not omly did T-T benefit from Al Kahn's experience at E-V, but Bob Heil helped design the audio section of the O II. With a good mic like the 707, it sounds great. 73 Ray W2RS ___________; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-06/msg00115.html (7,553 bytes)
177. Re: [TenTec] Using Ten-Tec mics with Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:05:20 -0400 (EDT); Barry, You'll have to ask Bob, or John Henry. All I know is what Bob told me. 73 Ray W2RS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contes; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-06/msg00117.html (6,534 bytes)
178. Re: [TenTec] ORRION ll S Meter (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 15:05:32 -0400 (EDT); Ed, I don't have a calibrated generator, but I have noticed that with the preamp off, the S meter is "Scotch," but with the preamp on, it reads about the same as those of nearby hams with other high-; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00012.html (6,790 bytes)
179. Re: [TenTec] pan adapter (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 20:04:32 -0400 (EDT); John, I'm not sure which updates you are waiting for. I'd like to see a sub receiver equal to the main receiver, and would be willing to buy an O III to get it, if necessary. On the other.hand, I thi; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00110.html (8,713 bytes)
180. Re: [TenTec] 516 tuning rate (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:32:44 -0400 (EDT); I've had mine for 6 years, and it's a great driver for the 1208 transverter. Unlike a 100-watt rig, it won't blow the 1208 even if you goof and run full power. 73 Ray W2Rs In a message dated 7/30/201; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00198.html (8,177 bytes)

Current List: 161 - 180
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]