Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:SS409SS@aol.com: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] signal on 28.634 (score: 1)
Author: SS409SS@aol.com
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 08:46:45 -0500
I've been hearing this on many a rig for over Ten Years, I am surprised noone has mentioned it anywhere sooner.. I figured it was some laboratory licensed by the FCC to conduct their testing on that
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00132.html (8,681 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] What's an SDR? (score: 1)
Author: SS409SS@aol.com
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:27:54 -0500
So a rig with an A/D convertor for transmit and receive qualifies it as SDR. The first ham rig I can recall having those features would be the TS-870. Being upgradable and having encoders for control
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00552.html (7,109 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] Non Weasled Corsair for sale (score: 1)
Author: SS409SS@aol.com
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:30:48 -0500
Be advised that if you decide to "weasel out" the filters. I sell the De-Weaseling tool to get them out. Don't try to copy the tool though, that would make you a tool copying weasel and BTW it IS pat
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00503.html (7,139 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1)
Author: SS409SS@aol.com
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:56:19 -0400
For lack of a better example, I can say this.. As a young and silly ham I hadnt a clue what a good radio was.. I was more interested in bells and whistles and not what TT had to offer in the way of R
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00377.html (10,217 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1)
Author: SS409SS@aol.com
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:32:46 -0400
Hey Ben, Tnx for the reply.. Please read the next guys comment to me on the reflector, its like I raped his wife or something.. He was highly insulted that I said the 850 is a cement mixer... He shou
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00391.html (10,909 bytes)

26. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1)
Author: SS409SS@aol.com
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 23:58:33 -0400
Ok, after many flames (the post was intended to go private but went to the group) I went back and reread Mr. Turners answer to my opinion post and realized he wasnt being a stick in the mud as I susp
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00430.html (8,695 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1)
Author: SS409SS@aol.com
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:00:46 -0400
I will try this again, I sent an apology out last night. It wasnt posted to the reflector. see below: Ok, after many flames (the post was intended to go private but went to the group) I went back and
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00431.html (8,849 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1)
Author: SS409SS@aol.com
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 14:02:47 -0400
I just wished it happened sooner, I was getting the much deserved flames in my mailbox. I am very sensitive about my affinity for the TT nameplate. I dont take criticism too well and often snap into
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00473.html (10,852 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] Congrats to Scott W4PA! (score: 1)
Author: SS409SS@aol.com
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 14:07:47 -0400
He used an 850?? :-) Richy N2ZD
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00474.html (7,325 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Icom 7800 Review Published (score: 1)
Author: SS409SS@aol.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:41:06 -0400
As we know, the ARRL likes the advertizing $$ as well. Just ask John Bee, when we told him about the problems with the FT100 he weighed what was worth more when deciding if he should inquire further.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00811.html (9,860 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Icom 7800 Review Published (score: 1)
Author: SS409SS@aol.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:41:15 -0400
As we know, the ARRL likes the advertizing $$ as well. Just ask John Bee, when we told him about the problems with the FT100 he weighed what was worth more when deciding if he should inquire further.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00812.html (9,588 bytes)

32. [TenTec] Any known issues with the Omni V logic board? (score: 1)
Author: SS409SS@aol.com
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 19:38:25 -0400
Hi Rich here, I have a problem with an Omni V, I am trying to rectify this myself if I can. I am wondering if anyone had run into this before. The rx and tx are dead. (The notch,pbt etc will work whe
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00570.html (7,434 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu