Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:W1CG@QSL.NET: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] OT: Overseas equipment selling / shipping (score: 1)
Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:58:32 -0400
Hi, I sold some gear overseas. One UPS shipped overseas, but the buyer had an account, so it was easy. I wouldn't ship overseas unless the buyer has a UPS account. He paid with a bank draft. I made 1
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00810.html (9,286 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] ORION and IC7800 - Kirby - GUI's (score: 1)
Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 07:18:05 -0400
Hi All, I agree that there needs to be some rethought on the interface on rig control software. One needs to think "Communicating" as instead of rig control as an objective. What do you need to get t
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00812.html (14,207 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] ORION and IC7800 - Kirby - GUI's (score: 1)
Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:29:42 -0400
Similarly in concept I've been running 4 "radios" simultaneously on 4 separate bands and have all of them communicating with WriteLog. Works pretty darn slick too, rather than trying to drive radios
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00840.html (10,380 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 09:18:48 -0400
Jim, There is a big debate over Jupiter vs ICOM 746PRO, and as it is the Ten Tec reflector, it is obviously biased toward the Jupiter. I am coming more to think the Jupiter would be a good rig for th
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00261.html (11,006 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 09:22:52 -0400
Sori Joe, Hit the wrong button W1CG _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00262.html (8,319 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] WTB...LDG tuner (score: 1)
Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 18:14:12 -0400
Marv, I built the 30 watt model from a kit. One of their techs told me it was good for 60 watts, and soon they upgraded its ratings to 50 watts, I believe. I have been running it at 100 watts without
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00290.html (7,985 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] FS...LDG Z11 tuner (score: 1)
Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 07:28:59 -0400
Hi, Just adding that I have been using my Z11 on 100 watts for the last two years without incident. W1CG At 05:47 PM 7/9/2004, Felton Mitchell wrote: I have for sale the LDG Z11 low power unit that I
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00307.html (7,325 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] RE: Delta I vs Delta II (score: 1)
Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:26:51 -0400
Argonaut II ? TenTec 515? Don't believe so. I have one sitting here on my desk, and it doesn't cover 60m. At 02:15 AM 7/28/2004, you wrote: Delta II / Argonaut II specs Both radios will operate on 60
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00900.html (7,255 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] RE: Delta I vs Delta II (score: 1)
Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:01:40 -0400
Bob and all, You are correct. I thought the 515 was the Argonaut II, but upon checking Rich Arland's Low Power Communication, I see the 535 is similar to the Delta II, without the 100 watt deck. I ap
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00907.html (8,073 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] DSP and older Ten Tecs (score: 1)
Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 21:44:53 -0400
Hi, I have a Timewave DSP-59+ and find it very useful with a older rig like my Triton IV, 540. I have used it with my Omni VI+, and find the DSP filter redundant with the dual 500 and 250 hz. filters
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00034.html (8,320 bytes)

11. [TenTec] Argonaut 515 (score: 1)
Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 22:02:11 -0400
Hi, I have a nearly mint Argonaut 515 from an estate I am getting ready to sell on e-bay. It has a Notch/CW model 208A outboard filter, a matching Ten Tec power supply, and a Heathkit QRP SWR/wattmet
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00037.html (7,318 bytes)

12. [Orion] Re: [TenTec] Chasing RTTY DX with the Orion (score: 1)
Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 07:47:56 -0400
Duane, You can check out the New Communications Solutions Multi-RX Mixer at www.ncsradio.com I checked it out but decided to do something different for my case. I don't have an Orion, but operate S02
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00162.html (8,863 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Re: NAR filter is OMNI-6 (score: 1)
Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 20:54:44 -0400
All, It's in the "narrow" bandwidth digital modes like PSK31 and PSK63 that the filters in the NAR position in the Omni-VI + really shine. The receiving screen for the PSKxx program is a spectrum ana
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00319.html (10,350 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter or Omni (score: 1)
Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:24:56 -0400
Bill, The Jupiter and Omni are not in the same class. The Omni VI+ was about the best radio on the market until the K2 then the Orion came out. (I have both the Omni-VI and K2). However, I have heard
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00462.html (8,026 bytes)

15. [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range (score: 1)
Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 16:53:38 -0400
Hi, Our club is considering buying a Jupiter. I have never seen one, let alone operated one. We plan to get and show the company video on it. Other rigs under consideration are an ICOM 746PRO and a K
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00073.html (8,005 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Resonant antennas (score: 1)
Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 20:14:51 -0400
Ken, What you say is true, and you can point out some good examples of antennas that are not resonant that work better, and extended double zepp, for example. But you have to qualify what you say. Yo
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00103.html (10,232 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range (score: 1)
Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 19:48:59 -0400
Jim, Tnx for the input. Some comments on your comments. On CW, some of us locally who have K2/100s have difficulty in seeing any improvement in operation by using DSP on CW, other than the improved f
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00104.html (12,411 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] RF (score: 1)
Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 21:23:08 -0400
Hi, I had an RF feedback problem with my Omni-VI+ for three years. It just kept getting worse. I tried all the usual fixes and some inside, like making sure all the internal plugs were tight, and add
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00326.html (9,874 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Software Testing (score: 1)
Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:10:27 -0400
Hi, Although software testing, Quality Assurance that is, has come a long in recent years, there is no substitute for an independent QA department that does it's own testing, using it's own software
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00524.html (9,518 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] DC Cable for Triton IV -- 540? (score: 1)
Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:17:41 -0400
Hi, You guys are making me very curious about which connector the Trident IV has, so I went down and looked at mine. The rig, a model 540, analog, has a 6 pin Jones Plug. The power supply, a model 26
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00804.html (10,164 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu