Mail Archive Search: <+from:W1CG@QSL.NET>

Results:

References: [ +from:W1CG@QSL.NET: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Inrad filter in Omni VI (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <w1cg@qsl.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:12:19 -0500; Paul, I have ordered an InRad roofing filter for my OMNI-VI+, and I have the same filter arrangement as you in N-1 and N-2. I noticed a slight attenuation with the 250 Hz filter, but I can't say I ev; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00809.html (8,130 bytes)
2. [TenTec] 700/705 MIKE (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <w1cg@qsl.net>; Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 09:26:38 -0500; HI, Will someone please send me the pin out connection of the Ten Tec 705 and 700 mikes? I am trying to figure them out, and I want to be sure I have them right. Tnx, Chas, W1CG; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00297.html (6,751 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] INRAD Omni VI roofing filter kit - success (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <w1cg@qsl.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:26:03 -0500; Rick, That answers one question I had. Now another. Why couldn't you install both roofing filters, the 2400 Hz in series with the 600 Hz filter, and only switch the 600 Hz filter with the N-1 switch.; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00507.html (12,700 bytes)
4. [TenTec] GFI Problems (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <w1cg@qsl.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 22:34:53 -0500; Hi, I hooked up my Swan Linear to my OMNI-VI and had some RF in the shack when using my Windom antenna which I cured by installing a couple of 1:1 baluns in the coax feed line, but I still have one p; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00555.html (8,579 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Jupiter Accessory Jack (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>; Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 08:02:08 -0500; Hi, Can someone please send the pin designations of the Accessory 1 jack of the Jupiter? I don't have the manual. TNX Chas, W1CG; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00042.html (7,179 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Accessory Jack (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>; Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 16:56:30 -0500; Tim, Tnx. I really appreciate the assistance. Now I can finish the interface. Wasted more time looking for the manual than it took to get an answer from you guys. Chas At 10:05 AM 11/2/2004, you wrot; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00064.html (7,690 bytes)
7. RE: [TenTec] Question regarding Omni VI+ on SSB (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>; Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 12:33:52 -0500; Hi, Agree with the ratings but you need to differentiate between the K2 and K2 with DSP. The K2 with DSP is one notch higher than the K2 without it. I'd give the K2 with DSP an 8 as a SSB rig. The th; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00614.html (10,663 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Jupe+n4py+mixw2 (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 06:23:23 -0400; Jerome, With MixW and the N4PY program, in MixW go Configure-TRCVR CAT/PTT-TEN TEC-Pegasus \ Jupiter (emulation mode) and fill in the software path. Now the MixW will import the frequency/andd/mode f; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-10/msg00231.html (9,747 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>; Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 16:53:38 -0400; Hi, Our club is considering buying a Jupiter. I have never seen one, let alone operated one. We plan to get and show the company video on it. Other rigs under consideration are an ICOM 746PRO and a K; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00071.html (9,129 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Resonant antennas (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>; Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 20:14:51 -0400; Ken, What you say is true, and you can point out some good examples of antennas that are not resonant that work better, and extended double zepp, for example. But you have to qualify what you say. Yo; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00100.html (10,939 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>; Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 19:48:59 -0400; Jim, Tnx for the input. Some comments on your comments. On CW, some of us locally who have K2/100s have difficulty in seeing any improvement in operation by using DSP on CW, other than the improved f; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00101.html (13,833 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] RF (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>; Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 21:23:08 -0400; Hi, I had an RF feedback problem with my Omni-VI+ for three years. It just kept getting worse. I tried all the usual fixes and some inside, like making sure all the internal plugs were tight, and add; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00323.html (9,990 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Software Testing (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>; Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:10:27 -0400; Hi, Although software testing, Quality Assurance that is, has come a long in recent years, there is no substitute for an independent QA department that does it's own testing, using it's own software; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00521.html (9,537 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] DC Cable for Triton IV -- 540? (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:17:41 -0400; Hi, You guys are making me very curious about which connector the Trident IV has, so I went down and looked at mine. The rig, a model 540, analog, has a 6 pin Jones Plug. The power supply, a model 26; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00801.html (10,372 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] DSP and older Ten Tecs (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>; Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 21:44:53 -0400; Hi, I have a Timewave DSP-59+ and find it very useful with a older rig like my Triton IV, 540. I have used it with my Omni VI+, and find the DSP filter redundant with the dual 500 and 250 hz. filters; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00034.html (8,680 bytes)
16. [TenTec] Argonaut 515 (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>; Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 22:02:11 -0400; Hi, I have a nearly mint Argonaut 515 from an estate I am getting ready to sell on e-bay. It has a Notch/CW model 208A outboard filter, a matching Ten Tec power supply, and a Heathkit QRP SWR/wattmet; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00037.html (7,157 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Chasing RTTY DX with the Orion (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>; Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 07:47:56 -0400; Duane, You can check out the New Communications Solutions Multi-RX Mixer at www.ncsradio.com I checked it out but decided to do something different for my case. I don't have an Orion, but operate S02; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00173.html (8,767 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Re: NAR filter is OMNI-6 (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>; Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 20:54:44 -0400; All, It's in the "narrow" bandwidth digital modes like PSK31 and PSK63 that the filters in the NAR position in the Omni-VI + really shine. The receiving screen for the PSKxx program is a spectrum ana; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00319.html (10,760 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter or Omni (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>; Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:24:56 -0400; Bill, The Jupiter and Omni are not in the same class. The Omni VI+ was about the best radio on the market until the K2 then the Orion came out. (I have both the Omni-VI and K2). However, I have heard; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00462.html (8,420 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>; Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 09:18:48 -0400; Jim, There is a big debate over Jupiter vs ICOM 746PRO, and as it is the Ten Tec reflector, it is obviously biased toward the Jupiter. I am coming more to think the Jupiter would be a good rig for th; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00261.html (11,129 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]