Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:W4EF@dellroy.com: 64 ]

Total 64 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] Resonant antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 23:56:56 -0700
MHz. equation (and a mismatch. The circuitry Hi Jim, What you say is true, but take a look at the VSWR of a typical non-resonant antenna and you will see that VSWRs can be significantly higher than 4
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00107.html (12,860 bytes)

42. Re: [TenTec] RF (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 22:02:22 -0700
George, What is your antenna, and how are you bringing the feedline into the shack? Also, is the RF causing the computer to act up, or is the problem just with the keying interface? One way to tell i
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00333.html (9,306 bytes)

43. Re: [TenTec] Paragon behavior (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 21:13:36 -0700
Check the supply voltage under load, Tim. I had a problem with mine caused by a bad external fuseholder (high resistance) between the rig and the external power supply I was using. The rig was fine o
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00720.html (9,730 bytes)

44. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:02:20 -0700
Only 312 countries on 160 and doesn't use QSK. Your obviously a lid, Bill :) 73 de Mike, W4EF................................. -- --
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00743.html (9,855 bytes)

45. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 00:21:39 -0700
Hi Jim, Some would argue that it takes a masochistic streak to do it with low power and mediocre antennas. I mean, if I turn down my power and antenna gain so the guy on the other end can't hear me,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00748.html (11,971 bytes)

46. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:57:24 -0700
I guess I am just a LID. Boo Hoo. Mike, W4EF........................................ who
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00785.html (12,296 bytes)

47. Re: [TenTec] re Ten Tec amps and ALC (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 18:31:32 -0700
Check out: http://www.w8ji.com/transmitter_splatter.htm Scroll down to the paragraph entitled "ALC" Mike, W4EF................................................ to enough
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00850.html (10,244 bytes)

48. Re: [TenTec] Re: [WCARC] BPL Rollout A PLAN of ACTION (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:48:48 -0800
Wait a minute!! Don't forget that we are the authorized radio service, not BPL. FCC rules don't protect BPL from interference that it might suffer in the presence of LEGALLY AUTHORIZED RADIO TRANSMIS
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00110.html (10,962 bytes)

49. Re: [TenTec] Capture area (was 80 meter loops) (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:21:18 -0800
If you know the power density (in watts/meter^2) of an incoming plane wave, effective aperture is a very useful concept for determining the amount of energy captured by a receive antenna. In other wo
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00600.html (11,436 bytes)

50. Re: [TenTec] Capture area (was 80 meter loops) (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:10:39 -0800
Yes, there is antenna gain measured in dBi (dB isotropic) and then there is dBmb (dB in mind of beholder). As you suggest, the latter usually involves large DXCC totals and wet pasta :) 73 de Mike,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00607.html (10,141 bytes)

51. Re: [TenTec] Capture area (was 80 meter loops) (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 20:49:19 -0800
Actually Sinisa, you just made my point. If you know the effective aperture of the receive antenna, then you can do the calculation of received power straight away. If on the other hand you know the
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00621.html (10,513 bytes)

52. [TenTec] Re: Toasting those cores.... (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 04:34:26 -0800
Allan, I think what your saying is true for permanent magnets. In that case the orientation of the magnetic domains in the material are randomized by the elevated temperature, causing the net magneti
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00870.html (10,300 bytes)

53. Re: More Re: [TenTec] Orion redefines the meaning of ... AGC OFF (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 13:58:48 -0800
Actually what Sinisa is suggesting is not just mental monkey spanking, it is a very good test. If you don't hear an increase in background noise when you connect your antenna, your receiver quite lik
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00228.html (11,437 bytes)

54. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Spurs (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 19:22:22 -0800
Bill, I have a Paragon I here which oddly enough I hooked to my spectrum analyzer the other day (I wanted to set the power level to circa S9 so I could check out the key clicks with my Drake R4C). An
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00555.html (10,000 bytes)

55. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Spurs (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 01:50:22 -0800
Hi Bill, I checked my Paragon tonight with the VFO set to 1813.00 KHz. The high-level close-in spurs that I saw on the 7MHz spectrum are gone with this setting, but I am still seeing low-level discre
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00606.html (8,951 bytes)

56. Re: [TenTec] Here We Go Again (was Spectrum Hogs) (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:02:12 -0800
Yes, I agree. As long as you tailor your bandwidth to band utilization (wide when the band is empty, narrow when band is crowded), then I don't have any problem with wideband SSB. After all, nobody i
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00712.html (10,026 bytes)

57. Re: [TenTec] two-tone transmitter signals (was "New Idea") (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 14:14:09 -0800
A loop thru for an external linear amplifier would be nice too (this can be a major source of TX distortion). Seems like you could unmute the receiver by an appropriate amount and then downconvert th
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00943.html (9,100 bytes)

58. Re: [TenTec] PTT for CW (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 21:30:18 -0800
Its a handy feature if your keying an amplifier with a slow T/R relay. Contest logging programs like TRlog close the PTT line a few milliseconds before the CW starts. This can give a slow amplifier T
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01006.html (9,159 bytes)

59. Re: [TenTec] Boosting contesting scores by cheating via aid ofcomputer (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 23:50:25 -0800
Many of today's top contesters grew up with paper logs and dupe sheets. Today they use the mental bandwidth once consumed managing that paper and pencil and devote it to operating a second radio whic
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01072.html (12,343 bytes)

60. Re: [TenTec] Orions & contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 12:32:55 -0800
I would have to agree with Yuri on the importance of #5. I operate from a club station that is setup for Kenwood radios. If I plunked down $3.5K for an Orion, I would probably want to drag it over an
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01357.html (10,095 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu