Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:WA3FIY@radioadv.com: 319 ]

Total 319 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [TenTec] 80 m. American Novice Band allocation (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 08:48:45 -0800
Interesting.... What part of the country are you in Rob? Around here (Western Pennsylvania) there is lot's of activity there in the evenings. A lot of traffic nets, a slow speed net or two and plenty
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00585.html (7,614 bytes)

142. Re: [TenTec] Orion and PSK - overdriving computer (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:08:23 -0500
Sounds like you might have the Orion line out connected to the Soundcard MIC input. If that is the case, you would indeed overdive the soundcard. Connect to soundcard line input if it is not already
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00621.html (8,360 bytes)

143. Re: [TenTec] boost mobile voltage? (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:15:21 -0400
Bob, Here is what I THINK might happen with a 65 AH battery. I collected a bunch of data last year prepairing for field day and the Corsair was among the ten rigs I measured. All data was collected a
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00623.html (11,047 bytes)

144. Re: [TenTec] boost mobile voltage? (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:13:26 -0400
Bob, I settled on the AGM for various reasons. It's been a while so I don't remember all but basically it seems to have the best features of the other technologies with few disadvantages. I have two
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00636.html (12,502 bytes)

145. Re: [TenTec] Annual review of the Orion (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:35:28 -0400
It tells me that maybe Ten Tec should reverse the path they followed with the Pegasus and Jupiter and make an "Orion NFP" (no front panel) model. Enhance the remote control interface a little bit and
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00021.html (10,917 bytes)

146. Re: [TenTec] Omni C (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:34:15 -0400
The "pop" can be reduced by judicious use of the RF Gain control. I usually set my RFG so the S Meter is just a little bit off the peg. I can hear any signal that is above the atmospheric noise level
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00431.html (8,540 bytes)

147. Re: [TenTec] Omni C (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:39:46 -0400
Forgot to add if the receive signal is very strong, I set the RFG for something less than S9. What else did I forget? :-) -Lee _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenT
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00432.html (9,814 bytes)

148. Re: [TenTec] Omni C Sidetone (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 14:59:25 -0400
I don't think the Omni C uses any IC's in the sidetone. At least mine did not. It used a unijunction transistor oscillator very similar to that used in the Triton, Corsair, Argosy and possibly others
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00126.html (8,338 bytes)

149. Re: [TenTec] Simple Radio - No Computer Inside (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:25:20 -0400
The Corsair's also have this feature. I don't know about the Omni but on the Corsairs not only can you listen to two frequencies (on the same band) at once, you can also adjust the relative level of
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01102.html (10,799 bytes)

150. Re: [TenTec] Paragon backpanel AUX +13.8 fuse (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 12:48:44 -0400
The Paragon Aux 13.5V jack is protected inside the Paragon by a 2 amp fuse labeled "F1" on the control board. Not too convenient to change but it does protect the rest of the rig, power supply, etc.
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00252.html (7,663 bytes)

151. Re: [TenTec] 705 VS. 706 Microphone (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 19:52:23 -0400
I don't think that is correct. The 705 has been sold for many years as a assembled and tested mic. It may have been available as a kit as well. The 706 is similar but there are some changes in the PT
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00107.html (7,866 bytes)

152. Re: [TenTec] What makes the 238 good or any other tuner good? (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:43:34 -0500
Assuming similar quality of components, the tuner running at lower LOADED Q will have lower losses. Low loaded Q results in broad tuning whereas high loaded Q results in sharp tuning. The TT 238 is a
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00607.html (8,434 bytes)

153. Re: [TenTec] re if you ground it - it will come! (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 09:24:33 -0400
How about this for the ultimate lightning protected hamshack? http://www.peprollc.com/ I believe the enclosures have a perfect record of protecting the contents against near and direct lightning hits
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00285.html (8,218 bytes)

154. Re: [TenTec] Heil Mic's and the Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 16:54:09 -0400
I would start out feeding the line level output of the Behringer to the Jupiter aux input and select that from the menu. Set the Jupiter mic/level at 50% and then fine tune with the Behringer level c
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00548.html (9,226 bytes)

155. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V question (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 21:09:27 -0400
The lack of RF gain conrol contributes to the problem. Try switching the ATTENUATOR into the circuit. It will reduce the noise quite a bit but not eliminate it. I use the RFG extensively on my Corsai
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00011.html (8,630 bytes)

156. Re: [TenTec] Argonaut V question (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 13:55:01 -0400
Yet another possibility is that if you are using low impedance headphones, you need to add some attenuation. I have a rather severe hearing loss and still need to add in the range of 200 to 400 ohms
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00034.html (9,029 bytes)

157. Re: [TenTec] control voltages, OmniVI, clarification (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 13:59:24 -0400
I believe the connectors you are referring to are AMP MTA .100 series IDC connectors. Mouser has a complete listing. 73, -Lee _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTe
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00035.html (8,853 bytes)

158. Re: [TenTec] Sennheiser HD 202 w/ handi cable clip (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 09:14:09 -0400
The Sennheisers may be more sensitive than the Radio Shack Titaniums or the impedance of the Sennheisers may be lower causing more power to be delivered at the same VOLTAGE output at the headphone ja
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00287.html (9,271 bytes)

159. Re: [TenTec] Temporarily disabling Argonaut V transmitter (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 10:30:46 -0400
There may be another way to do it but I simply turn the power to zero and use a dummy load. Although the dummy load is probably not necessary, I feel better about having it in place. Since no power i
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00062.html (9,104 bytes)

160. Re: [TenTec] PSK/RTTY Which rig? (score: 1)
Author: wa3fiy@radioadv.com
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 10:07:45 -0400
Pegasus. Hands down...........Pegasus. Although I have a number of rigs at my disposal, the Pegasus is the one I keep going back to for the digital modes. Beside working very well and being exception
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00093.html (9,484 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu