Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:WD4K2@Charter.net: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Return policy (score: 1)
Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@Charter.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:56:30 -0500
Since owing one of the first (#52) Orions, I have read virtually every posting to this list for the past two years. I can tell you without a doubt, there are 10 or 15 venom infested hams with obvious
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00951.html (8,862 bytes)

2. [TenTec] RFI Prone (score: 1)
Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@Charter.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 00:11:35 -0500
Actual hands on experience with this issue: I have an Orion which sits within 8 inches of an Alpha 87A, and was at one time in between the 87A and an Alpha 91B, running full legal on both amps during
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00701.html (8,336 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Footswitches (score: 1)
Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@Charter.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 11:04:22 -0500
The best footswitches I have seen come from the music industry. I don't recall having seen one break even with massive abusive use. (a 200 pound guy stomping on it night after night. They are very ea
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00057.html (7,035 bytes)

4. [TenTec] Unveiling of DR1 (score: 1)
Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@Charter.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 17:51:09 -0500
Checkout the unveiling of the new K3BU DR1 prototype dream radio on the K3BU website. This was announced on July 4th I think, but definitely on Contesting.com. This is supposed to replace the Orion a
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00233.html (7,926 bytes)

5. [TenTec] 7800 reviews (score: 1)
Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@Charter.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:44:34 -0500
A couple of weeks ago I subscribed to the Icom reflector (as an Orion owner I admit to heresy)!! However I am so suprised that I have not seen a mention of the 7800, the review or anything pertaining
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00558.html (7,642 bytes)

6. [TenTec] 7800 Reviews (score: 1)
Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@Charter.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:58:02 -0500
OK, I stand informed..there is a separate reflector for the 7800. Too bad I have to subscribe to a Yahoo group to get there. Thanks guys...I retract the funny smell theory. Still odd that absolutely
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00567.html (7,173 bytes)

7. [TenTec] Unfinished (score: 1)
Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:16:08 -0500
I have been following the "unfinished" thread with a different view. I have never ever visited any hamshack where I wasn't told that it was "unfinished", a work in progress, usually followed by when
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00419.html (8,037 bytes)

8. [TenTec] Ebay (score: 1)
Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 20:49:32 -0500
I haved always been confused at such zealous refusal about anything EBAY. Does anyone, including the admin have a logical reason to be so dead set against even references to it. Personally I use it e
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00613.html (7,909 bytes)

9. [TenTec] Orion fixes (score: 1)
Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@Charter.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 20:31:28 -0500
The answer to the question why some of these habitual never ending complainers never send their rigs back to or consult with Ten Tec is because ....They Don't Own an Orion...! I believe I am not the
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00858.html (31,390 bytes)

10. [TenTec] RFI (score: 1)
Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 14:15:48 -0500
I cannot imagine why some are having RFI issues specific to the Orion. I doubt that is has anything to do with the Orion and highly suspect external shielding, wiring hookups and grounding. I have th
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00384.html (7,529 bytes)

11. [TenTec] BPL suit (score: 1)
Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 09:56:13 -0500
After reading BPL comments both here and on Towertalk for weeks, no one has come up with a solution. As much as I disagree with most Attorneys (even my brother in law), I watched a small claim agains
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00638.html (34,649 bytes)

12. [TenTec] Orion (score: 1)
Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:01:44 -0600
I have Orion #52 for sale. Scott, W4PA operated at my QTH near Nashville for IARU to a #5 finish last year using it..it was flawless and it has not been turned on since. I estimate no more than 30 ho
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00881.html (7,460 bytes)

13. [TenTec] Spam filter (score: 1)
Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:40:54 -0600
I have been made aware that several have responded to my email with no response from me in return, although I have received some just fine. This morning I found several unusual mails in my Norton spa
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00923.html (34,389 bytes)

14. [TenTec] Alpha 91b (score: 1)
Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@Charter.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 23:47:49 -0600
I have had a couple questions about the "Americanizing" of my 91B. That was a little tongue in cheek...actually for clarity: When I bought the amp at Dayton a few years back, the Bulgarian transforme
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00950.html (6,990 bytes)

15. [TenTec] Orion group (score: 1)
Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@Charter.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 09:18:10 -0500
Those of you who lump "Orion owners" into a generic group ALL wanting their own reflector is simply not accurate and a slap to the face of some of us. I DO NOT and have NEVER asked for anything separ
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00207.html (43,329 bytes)

16. [TenTec] Orion display (score: 1)
Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@Charter.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 21:53:30 -0500
I have had the Orion since last year, #52 and I really like the B/W screen especially reversed to white over black, it seems easiest on my eyes. BUT, I do have a question. What type of displays are u
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00246.html (7,193 bytes)

17. [TenTec] RE: Topband Digest, Vol 6, Issue 20 (score: 1)
Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@Charter.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 11:52:33 -0500
This Orion testing has gone from questionable to absolutely ridiculous. Isn't anyone here going to question statements of personal opinion cloaked as fact?? What credibility can one give to any claim
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00730.html (36,401 bytes)

18. [TenTec] receiver testing (score: 1)
Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@Charter.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:31:22 -0500
After posting my opinion of "seat of the pants/good ears" receiver testing, I was really surprised to get a bunch of mails supporting my position...and no flames..that's a shocker! But what I read he
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00755.html (44,764 bytes)

19. [TenTec] Buyer beware (score: 1)
Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@Charter.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:46:53 -0500
With all due respect Yuri and others have sadly missed the whole point. K6SE's endeavours were NOT tests...only the opinion of one guy sitting in a shack somewhere, using his memory to evaluate multi
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00823.html (39,182 bytes)

20. [TenTec] Field Day Orion (score: 1)
Author: "WD4K" <WD4K2@Charter.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 17:51:30 -0500
I would like to second Marty's comments. I had my 1000MP (fully filtered, Inrad etc) set up 5 feet from the CW station and the CW was destroying it. Both on 20M for instance, worst case. I decided to
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00909.html (32,401 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu