Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:WO8L@aol.com: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

21. [TenTec] Software Upgrade (score: 1)
Author: wo8l@aol.com
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 18:08:36 -0400
Interesting comments about the software upgrade. My radio requires no upgrades, although the two tin cans rust and the string needs replaced once in a while, but it gets point-to-point. Also, the bee
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00252.html (6,751 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] CW Tuning with Omni 6 Plus (score: 1)
Author: wo8l@aol.com
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 22:55:05 -0400
Hi, Weird. I tune my OMNI VI Plus so that I'm on the same frequency as the station I want to work. Just tune the main tuning knob and listen. When there, then I transmit. Works every time and has for
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00012.html (9,147 bytes)

23. [TenTec] Jupiter and PSK (score: 1)
Author: wo8l@aol.com
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 11:24:33 -0400
Hi, Anybody running PSK with a Jupiter and no interface? How do you connect? Thanks, Rick WO8L ________________________________________________________________________ AOL now offers free email to ev
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00029.html (6,901 bytes)

24. [TenTec] Jupiter on 10 Meter FM (score: 1)
Author: wo8l@aol.com
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 20:14:05 -0400
Hi, I know there is no PL tone routine provided in the Jupiter.? However, I think it does work split FM.? Anybody ever worked any repeaters this way. Thanks, WO8L North Carolina _____________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00272.html (7,088 bytes)

25. [TenTec] Technical Correspondence (score: 1)
Author: wo8l@aol.com
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:01:53 -0400
Hi, The idea of opening up software to any and all comers is a little scary.? First, in today's digital communications world, if?a company doesn't own and control the software, then what do you own??
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00329.html (7,941 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] Technical Correspondence (score: 1)
Author: wo8l@aol.com
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:48:23 -0400
Hi, Who in the world buys a consumer good, takes it apart and modifies or fixes it?? What?? Maybe .0001 per cent of the buyers worldwide?? If the thing breaks, you throw it away or give it to a chari
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00352.html (15,011 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] Technical Correspondence (score: 1)
Author: wo8l@aol.com
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 20:34:02 -0400
Hi Again, In the end, the issue is this. Should people have the freedom to modify all code in a good fasion or bad fashion at random?? Who decides what's good or what's bad.??Can the?modified program
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00353.html (15,150 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] Ford vehicle RF noise. (score: 1)
Author: wo8l@aol.com
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 12:12:17 -0400
Interesting. I have two ancient Ford Escorts with way over 100,000 miles on them, a Ford Focus with 50,000 and a Ford Ranger with 5,000 on it. Prior to that, I have owned a Ford Fairmont and various
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00056.html (12,775 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] Ford vehicle RF noise. (score: 1)
Author: wo8l@aol.com
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 08:17:04 -0400
I don't understand this entire thread. Now people are parnoid that they have a Ford where they need to drop the gas tank or do something else drastic to fix RFI problems. Again, I've had eight or nin
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00162.html (9,488 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] Omni-VI plus question (score: 1)
Author: wo8l@aol.com
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 14:54:47 -0500
Henry, As far as I know, the firmware version doesn't make any difference. It's an OMNI VI Plus.? I've never heard anybody ask about firmware versions before and I've had OMNI VI Plus rigs for 15 or
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00147.html (8,483 bytes)

31. [TenTec] Ten Tec Jupiter on PSK31 (score: 1)
Author: wo8l@aol.com
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:47:58 -0500
Anybody using the Jupiter on PSK with just the Ten Tec supplied chord directly to the computer sound card with no TNC? Does this really work?? What settings on the rig are appropriate? Thanks, Rick W
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00270.html (7,161 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] OmniV and PSK31 (score: 1)
Author: wo8l@aol.com
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:00:15 -0400
Do you run an interface or any form of impedance matching? --Rick ??WO8L Absolute correct. Run the RF output always at 100% and reduce the audio level from the sound card and or the mike gain to prod
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-03/msg00238.html (10,225 bytes)

33. [TenTec] Ten Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: wo8l@aol.com
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:34:41 -0400
I've already communicated extensively with Ten Tec via Scott about my deep concern for a feature on a new rig.? (O.K.? So it was only two e-mails.) In a nutshell, I am sick and tired of needing to ru
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00352.html (8,270 bytes)

34. [TenTec] Looking for a rig upgrade (score: 1)
Author: wo8l@aol.com
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:27:50 -0400
Yes, Kenwood and Yaesu rigs can be tough to get serviced.? I got rid of my backup Kenwood TS570 because it needed repair.? The parts had to be obtained from off shore.? The service people couldn't be
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00028.html (7,158 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter firmware any news???? (score: 1)
Author: wo8l@aol.com
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:49:34 -0400
Oh Boy.? Aren't we quick to jump ship. I think it'll be fine. Rick WO8L Well if the code was not ready to be released within the month it was announced, TenTec should NOT have made the software or up
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00179.html (11,662 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: wo8l@aol.com
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:56:25 -0400
After reading all of these posts and if somebody has a really?disappointed view of Ten Tec and wants to get rid of their equipment, I'd be interested in a 565 or an OMNI VII or an Orion II. Since som
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00311.html (10,613 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] Band Scopes, Engineers, Firmware, Etc. (score: 1)
Author: wo8l@aol.com
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:10:53 -0400
On the same topic, I've heard the complaints about?the Jupiter band scope, including statements that it's virtually useless. I find the feature really useful and fun.? And to me, while people complai
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00328.html (12,426 bytes)

38. [TenTec] Anniversary Keyer (score: 1)
Author: wo8l@aol.com
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:16:28 -0400
Oh brother.? Now people are nit picking the "feel" and " spacing" of Bencher keyers. I think I've heard it all now. --Rick ? WO8L _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list T
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-09/msg00290.html (6,927 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] Help needed with Jupiter firmware update (score: 1)
Author: wo8l@aol.com
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:34:42 -0400
Yes, you lose AM and FM with the CW readers.? However, that's using only the old, smaller chip. With the new, larger chip, you just switch back and forth between the CW personality and the full CW, A
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-09/msg00291.html (11,016 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter update with CW (score: 1)
Author: wo8l@aol.com
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:40:32 -0400
The chip upgrade is very simple. First, do the PLD upgrade as described on the Ten Tec web page. When that's done, remove the bottom of the Jupiter case, remove the old chip and install the upgraded
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-09/msg00293.html (8,996 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu