Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aa4nu@ix.netcom.com: 141 ]

Total 141 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] THANK YOU AND APOLOGY (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 19:26:39 +0000 (GMT+00:00)
Yo Jim, I think we all need to give each other a bit more grace? Especially on complex topics such as currently under review. We all makes mistakes, you made one this weekend with your post on the E
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00760.html (16,681 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Phase Noise Data Plotted to 1 MHz (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 23:01:57 +0000 (GMT+00:00)
Great summary Kim, and yes that data on the Orion II is disappointing too. I wonder if there is anything that can be done to resolve it only via firmware changes? I simply don't know. Jim, Thank You
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00780.html (12,659 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] THANK YOU AND APOLOGY - for Billy (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 11:14:29 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Hi Rick, Nope ... Re-read what the others have posted, band pass filters are wide bandwidth filters. Wide band width filters CAN NOT reduce in-band narrow "crud" ... they simply cannot by design. Now
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00829.html (19,881 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 14:44:58 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Bob, 200 watt rigs have been out for a long time, the FT1000D was likely one of the first or at least most popular rigs with 200 watts. IC781, 150 w ... with a higher voltage PA too. Then the IC775 .
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00073.html (16,779 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] (ham station computer choice) (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 20:40:43 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Jim, (the moderator of this forum?), Is this really to be allowed, a post by an unsigned person BLASTING about another member? Certainly we all pick and poke with differences at times as to being sub
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00096.html (9,321 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] QSK or not? (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 11:40:46 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Really Rick, that a rather subjective statement? So let's allow for other's experiences too as I have run a pair of AL-1200 amps here with the internal QSK board for over 20 years of DXing and contes
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00183.html (14,065 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] QSK or not? (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:02:06 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Hi Rick, and I enjoy following your posts! I was a SWL in DL land as a kid and was amazed at some of the signals there, so do understand the challenges a wee bit, glad to know things are improving th
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00186.html (18,052 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] QSK or not? (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 16:12:09 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Hi Rick, 1963-64 in Munich, I am the son of an Army aviator and I was barely in pre/elementary school there. I used to constantly run down the D cell batteries to the radio that my Dad had given me t
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00188.html (22,513 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII Speech Processor Question (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:00:29 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Check the various forum archives on this topic please as I believe Carl, Bob, myself, and others had a rather spirited debate on this very topic only a few years ago when the 715 product was first re
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00200.html (17,796 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu comparison (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 23:12:15 -0600 (GMT-06:00)
Sorry, I disagree, as the ability of the Orion platform to switch in the 1.8 verses ~3.0 of the FT5K, would ADD value to the overall chain. The narrower 1.8 would reduce even more of the other non-de
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00001.html (15,962 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu comparison (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:15:14 -0500 (EST)
Exactly Barry, the 1.8 is NOT going to produce a crystal clear SSB bandpass, however what it may allow is to copy that S2 or S3 signal surrounded by other S9 signals and not be as impacted as if we w
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00012.html (10,840 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu comparison (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:49:37 -0600 (GMT-06:00)
Bob, I believe you are discounting how well the "roofing filter" really protects the actual "IF" chain? Given today's platforms, the line is rather blurred as many would consider the "roofing filter"
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00233.html (12,434 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Model 566 Version 3.033xa posted (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 20:20:20 +0000 (GMT+00:00)
John, 1st - Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you and yours! 2nd - Thanks for this update, will give it a test very soon. 73 de Billy AA4NU --Original Message--
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-12/msg00110.html (9,569 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Need a ten tec mini coax cable with the tiny plugs (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 01:09:40 +0000 (GMT+00:00)
Jeff, See if these links help please: http://www.inrad.net/product.php?productid=336&cat=163&page=1 http://www.inrad.net/product.php?productid=337&cat=163&page=1 http://www.inrad.net/product.php?prod
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00296.html (9,803 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Radial Research (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 23:54:04 +0000 (GMT+00:00)
Whoa, not so fast, as this is how the poor "ham lore" gets started and passed around. Source: http://www.antennasbyn6lf.com/2011/02/comments-on-elevated-radials.html "... During the experimental meas
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00232.html (10,064 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Radial Research (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 11:35:02 +0000 (GMT+00:00)
Once again, I would suggest that we are tossing out "ham lore" without an accurate basis of support, see below please and let's walk through your statements together here. Rick, I tend to agree with
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00236.html (27,025 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Radial Research (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 11:52:07 +0000 (GMT+00:00)
Good Morning Kris, Actually I like simple, and so let's take a look at your situation please. It's it very easy to qualify what is going on there with sound proved facts. One ... most will gently tel
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00237.html (11,363 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] gas on the fire (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 02:50:06 +0000 (GMT+00:00)
John, The modeling software packages do take into consideration various ground parameters. Look carefully and you will see there are typically several "types" of grounds to select depending on the so
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00287.html (15,620 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Radial Research (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 00:19:20 -0400 (EDT)
Stuart, I have read all of N6LF's material, some text even before it was made public to others. OK? My goal in all of this is along what Jim Brown posted ... to encourage others to LEARN how all this
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00288.html (20,667 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] RFI Issues (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 18:30:11 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
And add another 2 cents to the collection to underscore what is being suggested ... This "Oh, I always unplug and disconnect" so don't have to do anything is going to bite you someday, when you least
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00302.html (20,679 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu