Mail Archive Search: <+from:aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:aa4nu@ix.netcom.com: 146 ]

Total 146 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Nice Write-up - July/August The DX Magazine ! (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Thu Jul 17 19:46:55 2003; There's a nice write-up on Ten-Tec/ON4UN/Orion in the July/August issue of The DX Magazine by Lynn, W4NL. <... and gee wiz, Scott ... a TIE? Did they force that?> 73 Billy AA4NU; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00520.html (6,466 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Orion TCXO Warm Up Drift (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Thu Jun 19 00:43:50 2003; Nothing 'wrong' with the Yaesu receiver either ... Let's see how the opinions hold after the "newness" of the Orion wears off. There was a post on other reflectors tonight about a new Orion being re; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00597.html (8,938 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Orion TCXO Warm Up Drift (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Thu Jun 19 01:40:10 2003; Hi Jim, and yes ... he was speaking of 160m ... which should be an excellent 'worst case' situation, as to 339 type signals? Actually, there's been several posts of USA<>EU QSOs over the past few mo; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00602.html (9,718 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Orion TCXO Warm Up Drift (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Thu Jun 19 01:48:00 2003; Hi ... I love this ... First some say ... oh no ... you can't go by the numbers ... what you want is real world experiences ... put the gear side by side and see what/if you can tell any differences; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00603.html (8,266 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Ten Tec Antenna (KLM Parts) (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Mon Jun 23 12:49:26 2003; Glenn, Check out this link ... suspect it's exactly what you are looking for ... http://www.dxengineering.com/bracketcomparison.asp Other pages on their web site have more details/pricing/etc. Anoth; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00705.html (8,210 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Buyer beware (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Fri Jun 27 19:09:12 2003; Yawn ... this is what, your 3rd rant this week? TT, F12, and now TT again, complete with the entire message digest included each time. Maybe it's time to lighten up a bit there OM? Sure ... now how; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00830.html (7,231 bytes)
7. [TenTec] KA4S's Orion Picture - Front Cover of "The DX Magazine" (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Thu May 1 14:29:58 2003; Snail mail just delivered today the May/June 2003 issue of "The DX Magazine" ... on the front cover is a picture of the KA4S/W4NL station with their Orion as the center rig ... 73 Billy AA4NU; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00007.html (6,606 bytes)
8. [TenTec] ORION AND SO2R (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Mon May 5 23:23:45 2003; Hi Chris, In a word ... NO ... Then again, neither does any other present 1 piece of gear. Can you CQ on 20m while listening on 40m at the same time? Nope ... Check the archives for past discussion o; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00118.html (6,533 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Orion interface update (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Tue May 6 00:14:31 2003; Excellent news Tommy! How will the new interface deal with the MAIN/SUB switching issues? Or will it be like the "norm" that most use ... follow the MAIN only? from the Orion manual PDF file ... the; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00122.html (7,384 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Orion interface (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Fri May 9 12:41:50 2003; Tommy, Thanks for the update ... but just to make sure ... this ONLY controls the MAIN rcvr/xmtr, correct ... NOT the SUB ... nor does this include the 2nd set of amp keying/etc. options yet? The int; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00245.html (8,152 bytes)
11. [TenTec] TT MoJo Alert - HIGH (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Sat May 17 13:18:53 2003; Hopefully, in a few more days, as in post-Dayton ... we'll know the real story <size of roofing filters, price, etc.> and the facts can then be confirmed and accurate comparisons be made. In the mean; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00541.html (6,943 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Orion questions (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Mon May 19 01:09:06 2003; Over the years, the Heil headphones have used several different elements ... that may explain why some Heil users are having good success, and others are not. The same situation occurs with other br; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00665.html (8,381 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Advantage Orion - Receive Antenna Switching (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Thu May 22 15:05:57 2003; I'll toss this one into the fray of the Orion verses IC785 ... Look at the IC785 brochure ... look closely at the both the front and back of the rig ... next look even closer for ANY indications of h; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00846.html (9,771 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Power Supply Damage Control (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Thu May 22 15:15:43 2003; Before I improved the station/house grounding here, that 723 chip would be the 'sacrifice' during surges and such ... to the point of I put a socket in the Astrons supplies so I could R&R the chip q; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00847.html (7,868 bytes)
15. [TenTec] PS962 (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Sat May 24 19:47:35 2003; BEWARE Mike ... one of my friend's xYL was doing the same thing here. But ... oh my ... did he mess up BIG TIME ... he thought she was just counting the pieces of equipment ... OH NO ... she was cou; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00971.html (7,330 bytes)
16. [TenTec] Orion - CW Rise & Fall Times? (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Tue Apr 1 21:08:35 2003; Any comments on the CW keying yet? Anyone try changing the CW Rise - Fall times? Comparison of the 'CW note' with say the VI+? <as in no more micro-chirping?> TU! 73 Billy AA4NU; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00021.html (6,498 bytes)
17. [TenTec] Fw: Orion (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Thu Apr 3 23:29:22 2003; Sorry ... B-( Not going to happen until the contest logging software is out, and proven to work as well as the present setup... Ditto for the hardware interfaces such as Top Ten and others. Much of; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00095.html (9,741 bytes)
18. [TenTec] Fw : Orion first impressions (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Wed Apr 9 11:46:37 2003; Ho hum ... I was wondering how long before the "TenTec is the very best" mojo would start to be posted. <sigh> Yet isn't K2WS a customer too? K2WS presented some very interesting points for consider; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00231.html (9,813 bytes)
19. [TenTec] Some Orion vs. RX-340 stuff (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Thu Apr 10 22:56:20 2003; Hi Jim, On RTTY < and possibly other digital modes?>, it is VERY handy to have a FAST tuning rate, and a SLOW tuning rate. I only operate RTTY as to digital stuff, but would imagine the newer modes; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00269.html (9,011 bytes)
20. [TenTec] Re: Questions about some Orion behaviours (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Wed Apr 16 22:30:16 2003; Old news here Pete ... "the other guys" have been doing this for YEARS. That's why everyone wanted the Omni VI to have the 2nd rcvr ... B-) Different from an Omni VI perhaps, but not from the other; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00405.html (8,272 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]