Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aa4nu@ix.netcom.com: 141 ]

Total 141 documents matching your query.

101. [TenTec] Orion - CW Rise & Fall Times? (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 20:11:02 -0600
Any comments on the CW keying yet? Anyone try changing the CW Rise - Fall times? Comparison of the 'CW note' with say the VI+? <as in no more micro-chirping?> TU! 73 Billy AA4NU
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00022.html (6,895 bytes)

102. Re: [TenTec] Fw: Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:31:57 -0600
Sorry ... B-( Not going to happen until the contest logging software is out, and proven to work as well as the present setup... Ditto for the hardware interfaces such as Top Ten and others. Much of
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00096.html (10,232 bytes)

103. Re: [TenTec] Fw : Orion first impressions (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:49:45 -0500
Ho hum ... I was wondering how long before the "TenTec is the very best" mojo would start to be posted. <sigh> Yet isn't K2WS a customer too? K2WS presented some very interesting points for consider
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00232.html (10,252 bytes)

104. Re: [TenTec] Some Orion vs. RX-340 stuff (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 21:58:17 -0500
Hi Jim, On RTTY < and possibly other digital modes?>, it is VERY handy to have a FAST tuning rate, and a SLOW tuning rate. I only operate RTTY as to digital stuff, but would imagine the newer modes
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00270.html (9,484 bytes)

105. Re: [TenTec] Re: Questions about some Orion behaviours (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 21:33:35 -0500
Old news here Pete ... "the other guys" have been doing this for YEARS. That's why everyone wanted the Omni VI to have the 2nd rcvr ... B-) Different from an Omni VI perhaps, but not from the other
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00406.html (8,683 bytes)

106. Re: [TenTec] Re: Questions about some Orion behaviours (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:38:08 -0500
Nope, not yet ... I have been discussing this project LONG before you even knew it existed ... so mellow out ... Scott and I have been going back and forth on this way before it was even named. Real
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00460.html (8,843 bytes)

107. Re: [TenTec] limited Orion reviews? (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 20:55:04 -0500
100% Correct ... recall that N9VV confirmed this for us some time ago ... the Orion is not SO2R. <and let me QUICKLY add, neither is any other rig before the TT mojo artists fire up on this post ...
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00491.html (8,876 bytes)

108. Re: [TenTec] Orion Reviews (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 22:17:14 -0500
Gee ... and why is that? ... Think it might be due to the fact that others still have a dealer network, and the problems for the dealers to handle the gear? All together now ... "never mind" ... B-)
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00503.html (10,256 bytes)

109. Re: [TenTec] ORION SO2R CAPABILITY (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 18:32:01 -0500
AC5E, I'll like you to meet one of the BEST ... he is W4PA ... especially on CW, Scott can do the above like he was born to run the stations! He can sit there, hold a conversation speaking with you,
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00544.html (11,622 bytes)

110. Re: [TenTec] Orion External T/R Switching (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:37:45 -0500
Jim, I know that Phil, K5PC has used the very same unit with many different rigs, and different amps for many years. Might be worth your time to email or contact him as to what he is doing different
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00812.html (7,862 bytes)

111. Re: [TenTec] Orion T/R Question, News (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:57:25 -0500
Heck of response to encourage current non-TT users to give TT a try ... especially for those whose units have worked well for years with non-TT gear and enjoy high power QSK CW ... <sigh> 73 Billy A
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00852.html (8,161 bytes)

112. Re: [TenTec] Orion/AL-1200 QSK -- Hard lesson #1 (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 14:50:25 -0600
Grant, Would you expand the above please ... as your saying that if you want to use the Orion, but with the AL1200 OFF ... you have to go into the Orion's MENU and turn the keying loop OFF also? Tha
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00963.html (8,920 bytes)

113. Re: [TenTec] Orion/AL-1200 QSK -- Hard lesson #1 (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 15:56:18 -0600
Grant, Thanks for the information! Mnnn ... Are/did you using a diode in the keying line at present? Or is the "Y" solid wiring? Wonder if the diode might be in the wrong portion of the "Y" ? <as in
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00966.html (10,197 bytes)

114. Re: [TenTec] Orion/AL-1200 QSK -- Hard lesson #1 (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 20:54:41 -0600
I use 2 AL1200s here with the "other brand" xcvrs... Both amps have the internal QSK boards (of slightly different design) The present setup <in use for 10+ years now> does NOT have the separate sen
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00973.html (9,071 bytes)

115. [TenTec] Ameritron QSK Unit ... (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:36:48 -0600
Interesting as I have been using the internal version (with AL1200s) here for probably 10 years or so ... 2 different versions of the board. To date ... TS930S, IC-765, and FT1000MP ... with NO prob
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00114.html (7,310 bytes)

116. [TenTec] Dear Scott & Ten-Tec ... "Thanks!" (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 17:05:05 -0600
Dear Scott & Ten-Tec ... Just wanted to stop for a moment and say "THANKS" ... Thanks for being willing enough to create something different and better ... Thanks for the guts to put quality before c
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00231.html (9,615 bytes)

117. Re: [TenTec] Even MORE on vertical antennas! (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 09:23:42 -0500
Huh? Once a signal leaves, and is reflected it is not longer vertically or horizontally polarized .... speaking at HF. Line of sight, may be different ... but what you are saying makes little or no s
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00051.html (9,216 bytes)

118. Re: [TenTec] Even MORE on vertical antennas! (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 12:45:09 -0500
Fable? Practical experience? Whose ... yours? Really ... tell me why the contest stations don't have a vertical as part of their setups ... let's talk about why folks run verticals on the low bands
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00061.html (9,413 bytes)

119. Re: [TenTec] Dayton-one more view (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 21:46:32 -0500
How's that ? I mean guys, really ... receivers DO work without color displays ... Does having a color display mean I hear and can copy signals that I can't with a <gasp> mono display ? :-) Yes, I ag
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00375.html (8,824 bytes)

120. Re: [TenTec] New bands (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 21:49:26 -0500
Many of the "rice boxes" can cover the new 5 MHz band just fine now. As for the older Ten-Tecs ... yes, that will be an interesting question ... 73 Billy AA4NU
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00376.html (7,250 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu