Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aa4nu@ix.netcom.com: 146 ]

Total 146 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 13:30:18 -0600
Agree ... Good summary ... Disagree ... Example? Try and use a 20m yagi ... on 10m ... while the 20m yagi is 2x larger ... it's performance will be much less. Summary ... To quote N4KG ... "bigger a
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00371.html (8,445 bytes)

82. Re: [TenTec] 80 meter loops (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 21:49:57 -0600
Not so fast ... as in try using a 20m dipole on 10m? Twice the 'area' ... yet ... NOT twice the performance. Slow down guys ... some of you may be exceeding the "speed of physics" here. B-) <Note th
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00458.html (8,938 bytes)

83. Re: [TenTec] 80 meter loops (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:33:26 -0600
Your statement was capture area ... so why doesn't the 20m dipole work twice as well on 10m? <even if matched?> There's reasons why I don't use my 80m 4x array on 40m, despite it having more 'captur
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00576.html (10,625 bytes)

84. Re: [TenTec] 80 meter loops (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:17:03 -0600
Getting into the technical is not a problem ... it's one of the parts of the hobby I still enjoy even after all these years. B-) OK ... now you are using effective area, before some were saying that
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00581.html (14,052 bytes)

85. Re: [TenTec] new TenTec software 3.170 (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 11:13:44 -0500
Tommy, How close does a "below 5ms" setting approach the threshold as to the Orion having 'clicks'? Seems like you, or others have posted that the Orion can/does/will also 'click' with the lower set
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00683.html (7,667 bytes)

86. Re: [TenTec] RF Grounding (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:05:50 -0500
Well now ... put me in Tom's camp ... as some of your "ideas" seem to go against what the professionals like Polyphaser state. Tom's done MANY things correctly from reading his details ... Funny als
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00454.html (7,744 bytes)

87. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Icom 7800 Review Published (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 11:10:19 -0500
How many times did they have to do a master reset? So I guess if you are going to be operating in a fairly busy contest, the 7800 is the way to go? B-) B-) B-) 73 Billy AA4NU _______________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00793.html (7,920 bytes)

88. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Orion Reliability (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:01:14 -0500
Certainly each person is entitled to their own "my belief", but such is not an indication of any accuracy nor truth in the matter ... ONE weekend without problems is what I recall Tom stated. ONE we
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00848.html (10,193 bytes)

89. [TenTec] Encrypted document (score: 1)
Author: "Aa" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:37:02 +0900
-- Virus Warning Message (on the network) text_document.com is removed from here because it contains a virus. -- -- Virus Warning Message (on the network) Found virus WORM_BAGLE.AF in file text_docum
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00455.html (7,475 bytes)

90. Re: [TenTec] Basic question (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 13:47:09 -0500
Perhaps I am showing my age but a forgotten 'trick' that can be used with just about any rcvr ... is to simply back off the RF GAIN to create a similar situation ... as in if the noise level is S-7,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00008.html (9,341 bytes)

91. Re: [TenTec] Re: Orion qsk and 425 (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:30:34 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Just for balance, I've been using a pair of the internal boards here in the AL1200s for approaching 10 years, many guest ops, across many different brands of gear ... with no damage. May everyone ha
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00548.html (7,549 bytes)

92. Re: [TenTec] Orion - Work in Progress - Part 1 (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 18:51:30 -0600
N0KHQ gives some very interesting tips ... to make the new Ten Tec gear be less "RFI sensitive" ... most of which is worthy of consideration until: Some hams get a little confused when talking about
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00536.html (8,394 bytes)

93. Re: [TenTec] Orion - Work in Progress - Part 1 - WHOA! (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:02:01 -0600
N0KHQ provides many interesting tips ... to make the new Ten Tec gear be less "RFI sensitive" ... most of which is worthy of consideration until: Some hams get a little confused when talking about Gr
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00537.html (9,934 bytes)

94. Re: [TenTec] IMD Measurements - Yaesu/Inrad vs Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 14:36:34 -0600
Even a stock Orion is still well ahead of modified MP's and the $80 Inrad #762 puts it even farther ahead. That's just the facts, ma'am. Subjective or objective? OK, Bill ... using your 'facts' ... f
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00853.html (7,993 bytes)

95. Re: [TenTec] IMD Measurements - Yaesu/Inrad vs Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 16:03:05 -0600
Spacing ARRL MkV ARRL MP RSGB MP 2 kHz 79 (+10) 71 (+2) 71 (+3) Comparable RSGB data for Orion's 2400 Hz filter at 2 kHz spacings is 89 dB. RSGB did not test the optional 1800 Hz filter but Sherwood
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00864.html (10,335 bytes)

96. Re: [TenTec] SDR (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 16:13:43 -0600
My sentiments exactly! It's now time for you to go post on the Yaesu reflector. SMILE ... Really, who died and left you to decide what everyone can/can't do on here? Can't take the heat? I've owned T
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00865.html (9,288 bytes)

97. Re: [TenTec] IMD Measurements - Yaesu/Inrad vs Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 16:42:50 -0600
Billy, the fundamental difference is that the FT-1000s have had this key click for nearly 15 years. The cure has been known for many years, and they haven't addressed this issue to this day! It's an
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00868.html (10,152 bytes)

98. Re: [TenTec] IMD Measurements - Yaesu/Inrad vs Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 19:51:56 -0600
AA4NU wrote: On the other hand ... folks like W8JI have provided us with solutions that make the click issue go away ... Tom's site mentions that with the change, the MP series now becomes one of the
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00879.html (14,624 bytes)

99. Re: [TenTec] Contest Data and Conclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 22:22:18 -0600
My conclusions? I love my Orion, it really doesn't bother me that some don't like it, and I only hope my competition doesn't discover it. And as an accurate, but subjective statement ... I'd agree wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00891.html (8,916 bytes)

100. Re: [TenTec] Contest Data and Conclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 11:34:40 -0600
Bill, Again, congrats on your contesting scores/effort. You continue to create straw men ... with lots of what-if's such as the time the M/x staffed the bands/etc. Ditto as to the prop/etc. As my pro
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00931.html (10,289 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
This search system is powered by Namazu