Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ac5aa1@gmail.com: 419 ]

Total 419 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:03:27 -0500
I don't think the concept was to pay for fixes, but to pay for new firmware functions. However, after some period of time, it might be reasonable to charge for ongoing "support" much like many softwa
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00274.html (10,429 bytes)

162. Re: [TenTec] Pan adaptor vs O2 scope (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 16:49:05 -0500
If I remember correctly from the last time I spoke with Scott, the sweep upgrade is for the Orion II only, is a hardware plug-in, and the display occupies the same space as the current sweep, but wit
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00021.html (8,687 bytes)

163. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII with ATU owners..... (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 16:27:33 -0500
Interesting - my Orion with ATU works FB on the SWR & tuner. No, it doesn't always show 1:1 match with the tuner engaged, but that's the tuner algorithm. It doesn't need to match to 1:1 anyway, so no
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00044.html (8,400 bytes)

164. Re: [TenTec] WHat's It Worth? (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 16:24:05 -0400
I "won" one recently on Ebay for $125. FWIW. 73, Duane AC5AA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ten
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00273.html (7,532 bytes)

165. Re: [TenTec] K3 information (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 13:49:19 -0500
Sounds like this is intended as a novelty approach, or one where your normal RTTY lashup has failed and you need to inform your net buddies that you're running in limited fashion. As was explained ea
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00548.html (11,157 bytes)

166. Re: [TenTec] Information (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 17:23:48 -0500
Who are you responding to? 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas www.ac5aa.com Ron: I'm not sure your reply was very fair to Elecraft. I have and enjoy an Orion II but I also have a K2/100 and
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00589.html (10,015 bytes)

167. Re: [TenTec] Information (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 20:38:14 -0500
Six meters is open - better to go work something there! 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas www.ac5aa.com that was well stated Larry. I would just like to see an improved update for my Orion
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00617.html (17,810 bytes)

168. Re: [TenTec] 4CX1600B (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 14:11:27 -0500
A better search might be Svetlana and GU91B. We all miss Tom Hix, who supplied many of these, but the GU91B's were in very short supply when the Titan II and the Alpha amp were designed. 73, Duane Du
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00651.html (9,854 bytes)

169. Re: [TenTec] TT Centurion (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:45:06 -0500
When I got my 3-500ZG matched pair replacements for my Centurion, they came with instructions to run the tubes for an hour (or two?) just with the filaments running before using them. I did, and they
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00252.html (8,534 bytes)

170. Re: [TenTec] TT Centurion (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:02:59 -0500
Hmm, now that you ask, Gary, I'm not sure . . . I guess it wasn't with the B+ turned off, but just idling. You know, the memory is a tricky thing . . . :-) At least, I don't remember running filament
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00259.html (11,070 bytes)

171. Re: [TenTec] OmniVI Plus Over Drive Amp (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:32:45 -0500
Is that 300W out RMS or peak? If it's RMS, you're really pushing it HARD! If it's peak reading meter, you're probably still pushing it. If it's LED's then maybe you have a concern. (I can't recall if
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00300.html (8,895 bytes)

172. Re: [TenTec] OmniVI Plus Over Drive Amp (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:53:36 -0500
1.) Power transistors don't take poundings (at least, not without getting even!) 2.) Have you described how you're reading the power? Peak/RMS, external wattmeter, internal LED power meter, etc? Mete
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00330.html (9,455 bytes)

173. Re: [TenTec] OmniVI Plus Over Drive Amp (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:10:21 -0500
Jim, If you use a Bird 43 on SSB, you'll need to either run tones or use a 43 with the peak reading kit in it. They have a very slow meter response. 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas www.ac
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00356.html (11,028 bytes)

174. Re: [TenTec] Tuner 238B (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:15:27 -0500
Try pulling the rubber tire a bit to move it forward on the knob - it could be that it has slid back and is rubbing against the skirt and forcing it to move forward faster than the vernier is trying
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00362.html (8,089 bytes)

175. Re: [TenTec] Looking for a rig upgrade... (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 23:27:23 -0500
Charles - can I assume you mean Orion I when you say OMNI I? 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas www.ac5aa.com Ok, u r on the Ten Tec reflector so expect good words abt them. Here is my list
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00035.html (11,454 bytes)

176. Re: [TenTec] SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 10:22:37 -0500
Most non-TT radios will crowbar the output finals well before 10:1 SWR is reached. I'm not sure what this chart is supposed to be addressing because there are so many variables which will affect the
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00055.html (7,767 bytes)

177. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 13:08:36 -0500
The earlier comment about reading the Handbook is a good one, and if you're interested in a more in-depth but very readable treatment of the topic, I recommend "Reflections II" by Walt Maxwell, W2DU.
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00061.html (8,839 bytes)

178. Re: [TenTec] 6N2 (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 17:48:51 -0500
I thought mine had a birdie on 50.125, but when I replaced it with an IC-706, it heard the same birdie, as did another 706 in my truck. It did have its own real birdies, but some of them aren't recei
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00193.html (8,349 bytes)

179. Re: [TenTec] re 6N2 6m birdies (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 17:56:05 -0500
Randy, I just replied about that 'birdie' that clobbers 50.125, and I noticed when I got in my truck, tuned to that freq, and then backed out of the driveway and away from the house, it went away. So
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00194.html (8,043 bytes)

180. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI and RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:32:17 -0500
Yes. The RTTY filter is built for the first IF (9 MHz) and is already shifted. The 2nd IF, 6.3 MHz, needs to be offset to match, so, yes, that turns out to be just where you have it set. Remember, ce
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00272.html (8,211 bytes)

Current List: 161 - 180
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu