Mail Archive Search: <+from:ac5e@comcast.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:ac5e@comcast.net: 252 ]

Total 252 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TenTec] 234 (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 20:46:49 +0000; I have three 234's that went with my three Omni VI+'s. All of them worked well before the Orion arrived. Anyone interested? 73 Pete Allen AC5E _______________________________________________ TenTec m; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00026.html (6,854 bytes)
122. [TenTec] Re: [Orion] RX problems (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 19:45:38 +0000; You may well not have done anything wrong. In coming up on a year with the Orion, there have been a couple of occasions when it appeared a flash memory or memory register was full of garbage. The sym; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00213.html (7,861 bytes)
123. RE: [TenTec] Information Week Article "FCCChairmanVisitsBroadbandProject" (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:00:58 +0000; _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00224.html (14,195 bytes)
124. Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:30:23 +0000; Hi Chris: I'm sure you will get all sorts of suggestions for this or that "wonderwire" or "wonder beam" but the fact is that on 75/80 only a gain (directional) antenna will outperform a simple dipole; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00273.html (8,085 bytes)
125. [TenTec] RE: [Orion] RX problems (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:20:54 +0000; Hmm, interesting hypothesis. I have not had my Orion lockup for at least several months - using Log-EQF, 3-4 hours a day, usually with the sweep on and set to 15 kHz. EQF did have some timeout proble; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00296.html (10,565 bytes)
126. Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:28:53 +0000; Chuckle - even back in prehistoric times we knew the only way to broadband a dipole is to make it lossy. However the reduction in field strength, while greater than a typical trap or loading inductor; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00298.html (9,538 bytes)
127. Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:05:34 +0000; Well, I should have said the only way to broadband a single thin wire dipole is to make it lossy. A "fat" dipole, whether it's a cage, "double pennant," folded, the original "fan," or some other vari; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00317.html (9,334 bytes)
128. RE: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:18:43 +0000; Well, TANSTAFFL. There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch! Never has been, never will be. And yes, there were several saloonkeepers in the ancestry. But even in those days the drinkers who feasted o; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00319.html (10,446 bytes)
129. Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 18:59:49 +0000; NOOOO, Bob, not quite. A low dipole is essentially an omnidirectional antenna, typically with extremely good efficency. A large loop is directional, "beaming" more of its applied energy in two direct; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00368.html (11,039 bytes)
130. Re: [TenTec] Problem with 705 mic (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 19:05:59 +0000; Mark, the 705 will work with voltage supplied through the mike plug on the front of your Ten-Tec radio. It's only needed if you use a 705 on a non - Ten Tec radio. So first take the battery out. Make; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00369.html (7,572 bytes)
131. RE: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 23:06:53 +0000; Rick, your observations generally agree with mine on NVIS antennas of any sort; whether dipole, inverted V, or loop, over very reflective ground. The experiment I observed used roughly 100,000 square; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00379.html (9,918 bytes)
132. Re: [TenTec] 80 meter loops (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:40:20 +0000; Well, Paul, I'm not knocking the horizontal loop. For what it's good for, vertical radiation on the fundamental and high angle radiation with both pronounced lobes and equally pronounced nulls on the; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00448.html (12,323 bytes)
133. Re: [TenTec] 80 meter loops (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 01:32:39 +0000; Stuart, we have also used low horizontal loops for FD - and I think we could have gotten an award for WAA. Worked All Alabama - or Arkansas - or Louisana, Georgia, west Tennesse, and the Missouri boo; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00450.html (10,027 bytes)
134. Re: [TenTec] 80 meter loops (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:05:28 +0000; While Bob's comments are well taken, we get to FD operations because they were mentioned early in this thread. And with all due respect to those who have operated the W5NA/K5PN station, we have never; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00461.html (13,950 bytes)
135. RE: [TenTec] 80 meter loops (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:25:11 +0000; Chuckle - Rick, the snake lost, but for the rest of the night every time the mike or headphone cord cast a shadow the phone operator was sure it was the snake's mate, come back to get him. He was sti; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00473.html (8,918 bytes)
136. Re: [TenTec] 80 meter loops (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:44:29 +0000; Hi Paul: Personally, I feel anything that helps a Ten Tec owner belongs on the list. My loop, ex-loop rather, at first was fed with 450 ohm ladder line through a Johnson "Kilowatt Matchbox." Later I; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00489.html (9,072 bytes)
137. Re: [TenTec] 80 meter loops (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 23:35:25 +0000; Well, Stuart, I originally bought the site of our last ten years FD's because it is very close to town and it's radio quiet. I drove around seemingly forever with a mobile rig looking for land and li; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00497.html (9,580 bytes)
138. Re: [TenTec] IC 7800/FT2000D/TenTec-? (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 03:07:28 +0000; Doug is good, but I suspect Doug is not the only talent out there. From some things I have seen there are some very good designers looking for work. So all is not lost, by any means. The questionaire; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00510.html (8,382 bytes)
139. Re: [TenTec] Capture area (was 80 meter loops) (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 21:03:34 +0000; So true. Any TX power gain in one direction is offset by an equal loss in some other direction. 100 watts in gets you 100 watts less resistance losses out. As Billy Whitehead found when he built an a; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00593.html (9,819 bytes)
140. Re: [TenTec] Capture area (was 80 meter loops) (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 21:49:57 +0000; Jim, my first exposure to "capture area" was in a text from 1935. Then as now, we were taught out of texts ten to twelve years behind the state of the art. Aperture came along in the mid to late 1940; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00598.html (7,772 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]